| Literature DB >> 33755100 |
Claudio Cropano1,2, Iain Place3, Chloé Manzanares1, Javier Do Canto4, Thomas Lübberstedt5, Bruno Studer1, Daniel Thorogood3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-incompatibility (SI) systems prevent self-fertilization in several species of Poaceae, many of which are economically important forage, bioenergy and turf grasses. Self-incompatibility ensures cross-pollination and genetic diversity but restricts the ability to fix useful genetic variation. In most inbred crops it is possible to develop high-performing homozygous parental lines by self-pollination, which then enables the creation of F1 hybrid varieties with higher performance, a phenomenon known as heterosis. The inability to fully exploit heterosis in outcrossing grasses is partially responsible for lower levels of improvement in breeding programmes compared with inbred crops. However, SI can be overcome in forage grasses to create self-compatible populations. This is generating interest in understanding the genetical basis of self-compatibility (SC), its significance for reproductive strategies and its exploitation for crop improvement, especially in the context of F1 hybrid breeding. SCOPE: We review the literature on SI and SC in outcrossing grass species. We review the currently available genomic tools and approaches used to discover and characterize novel SC sources. We discuss opportunities barely explored for outcrossing grasses that SC facilitates. Specifically, we discuss strategies for wide SC introgression in the context of the Lolium-Festuca complex and the use of SC to develop immortalized mapping populations for the dissection of a wide range of agronomically important traits. The germplasm available is a valuable practical resource and will aid understanding the basis of inbreeding depression and hybrid vigour in key temperate forage grass species.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Fzzm321990 1 hybrid breeding; Poaceae; Self-compatibility; heterosis; inbreeding; inbreeding depression; introgression; self-incompatibility
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33755100 PMCID: PMC8225281 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Bot ISSN: 0305-7364 Impact factor: 4.357
Fig. 1.Phenotyping sc in grasses using an in vitro pollination assay. (A, b) virgin pistils are dissected from flowering heads and (c) placed on a petri dish with a medium containing agarose, sucrose and boric acid. (D) the heads are isolated in paper bags and, at the time of anthesis, they are shaken to release and collect fresh pollen. (E) the pollen is sprinkled homogeneously from the paper bags directly onto the virgin pistils. (F) at least 2 h after pollination, the stigmas (E, black arrow) are separated from the ovary (E, white arrow) and mounted on a microscope slide after staining with aniline blue solution, which stains selectively for callose visualized within pollen tube cell walls under UV light (Martin, 1959). (G) The level of pollen compatibility is assessed by observing the pollinated stigmas using UV fluorescence microscopy. In self-incompatible plants (above), self-pollen is usually bright, and a short and thickened pollen tube can be observed. In self-compatible plants (below) self-pollen grains are translucent and they can produce a bright pollen tube that grows through the stigma branches towards the style.