| Literature DB >> 33754999 |
Leslie Barclay, Tim Davis, Jan Vinjé.
Abstract
We report a norovirus GIV outbreak in the United States, 15 years after the last reported outbreak. During May 2016 in Wisconsin, 53 persons, including 4 food handlers, reported being ill. The outbreak was linked to individually prepared fruit consumed as a fruit salad. The virus was phylogenetically classified as a novel GIV genotype.Entities:
Keywords: GIV; United States; Wisconsin; food safety; foodborne diseases; foodborne outbreak; fruit; genotype; norovirus; viruses
Year: 2021 PMID: 33754999 PMCID: PMC8007321 DOI: 10.3201/eid2704.204521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Epidemiologic curve of attendees and food handlers by date of illness onset for event during rare norovirus GIV foodborne outbreak, Wisconsin, USA. Arrow indicates event date and time period event occurred. am indicates 12:00 am–11:59 am and pm indicates 12:00 pm–11:59 pm. Dark red indicates laboratory-confirmed food workers, light red indicates probable food workers, dark blue indicates laboratory-confirmed attendees, and light blue indicates probable attendees.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of attendees associated with a norovirus GIV foodborne outbreak, Wisconsin, USA*
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Onset of illness | 2016 May 4 |
| Total no. ill | 49 |
| Hospitalized | 0 |
| Died | 0 |
| Duration of illness, d | 2 |
| Primary case-patients | 49 |
| Laboratory confirmed | 3 |
| Probable | 46 |
| Secondary case-patients | 0 |
| Laboratory confirmed | 0 |
| Probable | 0 |
| Sex | |
| M | 13 (26.5) |
| F | 34 (69.4) |
| Unknown | 2 (4.1) |
| Age range, y (median) | 17–77 (47) |
| Age group, y | |
| <1 | 0 (0) |
| 1–4 | 0 (0) |
| 5–9 | 0 (0) |
| 10–19 | 2 (4.1) |
| 20–49 | 24 (49.0) |
| 50–74 | 14 (28.6) |
|
| 1 (2.0) |
| Unknown | 8 (16.3) |
| Case-patients with known illness duration | 35 |
| Duration range, d | 1–5 |
| Duration median, d | 2 |
| Case-patients with known incubation period | 49 |
| Incubation range, h | 15–57 |
| Incubation median, h | 38 |
| Symptom | |
| Diarrhea | 44 (89.8) |
| Nausea | 41 (83.7) |
| Fatigue | 41 (83.7) |
| Headache | 35 (71.4) |
| Abdominal pain | 34 (69.4) |
| Chills | 31 (63.3) |
| Vomiting | 30 (61.2) |
| Body ache | 30 (61.2) |
*Values are no. or no. (%) except as indicated. Clinical and demographic characteristics for the 4 food handlers associated with this outbreak are not available.
Analysis of implicated food and drink in a norovirus GIV outbreak, Wisconsin, USA*
| Food and drink items implicated | Persons who ate food or drink | Persons who did not eat food or drink | RR (95% CI) | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | % Ill | Total | % Ill | ||||
| Any quiche | 74 | 58 | 5 | 60 | 0.95 (0.32–2.89) | 0.934 | |
| Ham and cheese quiche | 51 | 63 | 23 | 48 | 1.40 (0.83–2.38) | 0.229 | |
| Vegetable quiche | 21 | 48 | 54 | 63 | 0.71 (0.41–1.21) | 0.226 | |
| Any fruit | 71 | 65 | 7 | 0 | 2.84 (2.07–3.89) | <0.05 | |
| Cantaloupe | 55 | 67 | 12 | 25 | 2.29 (1.39–3.78) | <0.05 | |
| Honeydew melon | 52 | 65 | 12 | 25 | 2.17 (1.32–3.56) | <0.05 | |
| Grapes | 58 | 69 | 9 | 0 | 3.22 (2.20–4.73) | <0.05 | |
| Strawberries | 56 | 70 | 10 | 0 | 3.29 (2.22–4.90) | <0.05 | |
| Potato pancakes | 63 | 63 | 16 | 38 | 1.71 (1.04–2.82) | 0.060 | |
| Applesauce | 41 | 68 | 35 | 46 | 1.71 (1.00–2.95) | <0.05 | |
| Muffins | 50 | 62 | 25 | 52 | 1.26 (0.74–2.17) | 0.407 | |
| Butter | 9 | 78 | 64 | 56 | 1.97 (0.56–6.90) | 0.219 | |
| Orange juice | 60 | 63 | 17 | 47 | 1.44 (0.83–2.52) | 0.227 | |
| Coffee | 58 | 60 | 20 | 55 | 1.13 (0.64–2.03) | 0.675 | |
| Creamer | 21 | 67 | 53 | 55 | 1.36 (0.69–2.66) | 0.348 | |
| Water | 67 | 61 | 7 | 43 | 1.47 (0.73–3.00) | 0.347 | |
*RR, relative risk.
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis of rare norovirus GIV isolated during foodborne outbreak, Wisconsin, USA (red text), and reference strains. A) Partial polymerase gene (762 nt); B) complete capsid (VP1) gene (554 aa). Bootstrap support for 500 replicates is indicated on branches. For polymerase analysis, evolutionary distances were inferred by the Tamura-Nei model. For VP1 analysis, evolutionary distances were inferred by using the Jones-Taylor-Thornton matrix-based model. Reference strains are represented by type and GenBank accession number. Scale bar in panel A indicates nucleotide substitutions per site, and scale bar in panel B indicates amino acid substitutions per site.