| Literature DB >> 33754495 |
Kirill Chaprov1, Alexander Rezvykh2,3, Sergei Funikov2, Tamara A Ivanova1, Ekaterina A Lysikova1, Alexei V Deykin4,5, Michail S Kukharsky1,6,7, Alexey Yu Aksinenko1, Sergey O Bachurin1, Natalia Ninkina1,7, Vladimir L Buchman1,7.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess effects of DF402, a bioisostere of Dimebon/Latrepirdine, on the disease progression in the transgenic model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) caused by expression of pathogenic truncated form of human FUS protein.Entities:
Keywords: ALS mouse model; FUS; TLS; drug effects; gamma-carbolines; motor neuron disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33754495 PMCID: PMC8193697 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
FIGURE 1Effect of DF402 on the disease parameters in S‐FUS[1–359] transgenic mice. Experimental group of hemizygous FUS transgenic mice received DF402 in drinking water (70 μg/ml) from the age of 42 days. Kaplan‐Meier plot of animal survival in cohorts of hemizygous control (red circles, n = 40) and DF402‐treated (green squares, n = 32) littermate FUS transgenic mice. Log‐rank test revealed significant difference between survival curves, p = 0.0214 (A). Bar charts show means ± SEM and unpaired t‐test for the disease onset (B, *p = 0.0371), disease duration (C, *p = 0.0175), and animal lifespan (D, *p = 0.0146) in cohorts of control (n = 40) and DF402‐treated (n = 32) mice
FIGURE 2Clusterization of experimental mice at the age of 70 days using CatWalk data analysis and sorting of statistical differences in changes of gate parameters. (A) Results of classical (Torgerson) MDS analysis are shown. Each dot represents an experimental animal: blue for WT mice, red for untreated S‐FUS[1–359] mice, and green for DF402‐treated S‐FUS[1–359] mice. Total fraction of variance explained by principal components 1 (x‐axis) and 2 (y‐axis) was 47.3%. (B) Volcano plot illustrates the number of parameters that display significant changes between WT and S‐FUS[1–359] mice. Black line on y‐axis represents threshold of significant changes of parameters (−log10(0.05)). Red and black dots represent parameters with and without statistically significant changes, respectively. (C) Volcano plot illustrates the number of parameters that display significant changes between untreated and DF402‐treated S‐FUS[1–359] mice. Black line on y‐axis represents threshold of significant changes of parameters (−log10(0.05)). Green and black dots represent parameters with and without statistically significant changes, respectively
FIGURE 3Comparative analysis of the gait changes at the pre‐symptomatic stage between untreated and DF402‐treated S‐FUS[1–359] mice. CatWalk XT system was used to measure gait parameters during the pre‐symptomatic stage subdivided into three intervals (from 25 to 15, 14 to 8, and 7 to 1 days) as explained in the Material and Methods and Results sections and illustrated in Figure S1. (A) The Venn diagram shows the number of gait parameters that display statistically significant changes at three substages of the pre‐symptomatic stage as the result of DF402 treatment. (B) The graph illustrates frequency of occurrence of variables exhibiting significant changes for the studied transgenic animals at any of three intervals of the pre‐symptomatic stage. The size of each bubble indicates a number of variables for a particular qualitative and quantitative indicator, for example, limb or intensity. Enrichment score was calculated following equation log2(freq_significant / freq_overall), where freq_significant—frequency of the parameter among the list of significantly changed parameters, and freq_overall—frequency of the parameter among the general list of the parameters. Parameters with enrichment score lower than 0 were discarded. (C) Log2 fold change of gait parameters between untreated and DF402‐treated S‐FUS[1–359] mice separately for early, middle, and late intervals of the pre‐symptomatic stage. Gray zone represents insignificant changes
FIGURE 4Compensation of FUS‐mediated transcriptomic changes by DF402 treatment. (A) Comparison of log2 fold change for genes that show difference in expression levels between S‐FUS[1–359] and WT transcriptomes (x‐axis), and between S‐FUS[1–359] and S‐FUS[1–359]+DF402 transcriptomes (y‐axis). Positive values correspond to activation in transgenic mice or under treatment. One point represents one gene, and only genes exhibiting significant changes (FDR <0.05) are shown. Genes that display difference between S‐FUS[1–359] and WT transcriptomes are shown in red, and those that display difference only between S‐FUS[1–359]+DF‐402 and S‐FUS[1–359] transcriptomes—in black. (B) Dependence of compensation coefficient (y‐axis) on log2 fold change in the S‐FUS[1–359] vs WT comparison (x‐axis). Compensation coefficient was calculated as a percentage of [mean(logCPM)S‐FUS[1–359] — mean(logCPM)S‐FUS[1–359]+DF402)] / [mean(logCPM)S‐FUS[1–359] — mean(logCPM)WT]. (C) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes between groups S‐FUS[1–359] vs WT and S‐FUS[1–359] vs S‐FUS[1–359]+DF‐402. The expression values of the genes are Z‐transformed. Products of the transgene cassette expression, Fus and Thy1, that were not used in analysis of compensation shown in panels a and b, are still included in the heatmap with gene names shown in red