Literature DB >> 28967786

Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Stefanie I Becker1, Anthony M Harris1, Ashley York1, Jessica Choi1.   

Abstract

Attention selects behaviorally relevant stimuli for further capacity-limited processing and gates their access to awareness. Given the importance of attention for conscious perception, it is important to determine the factors and mechanisms that drive attention. A widespread view is that attention is biased to the specific feature values of a conjunction target (e.g., vertical, red, medium). By contrast, the results of the present study show that attention is tuned to the 2 relative features that distinguish a conjunction target from the irrelevant nontargets (e.g., larger and bluer). Moreover, an irrelevant conjunction cue that is briefly presented prior to the target can automatically attract attention, even in the absence of any feature contrasts. Importantly, automatic orienting to the conjunction cue was completely independent of the physical similarity between cue and target, and depended only on whether the conjunction cue matched the relative features of the target. These results demonstrate that attentional orienting is determined by a mechanism that can rapidly extract information about feature relationships and guide attention to the stimulus that best matches the relative attributes of the target. These results are difficult to reconcile with extant feature-specific accounts or object-based accounts of attention and argue for a relational account of conjunction search. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28967786     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Sharper attentional tuning with target templates in long-term compared to working memory.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min; Koeun Jung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Forty years after feature integration theory: An introduction to the special issue in honor of the contributions of Anne Treisman.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

6.  Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Zoe Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predicting how color and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features?

Authors:  Ashley York; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.