Literature DB >> 33754193

Surgical challenges in posterior cervicothoracic junction instrumentation.

Alberto Balestrino1,2, Renato Gondar3, Gianpaolo Jannelli3, Gianluigi Zona4,5, Enrico Tessitore3,6.   

Abstract

The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is a region of the spine submitted to significant mechanical stress. The peculiar anatomical and biomechanical characteristics make posterior surgical stabilization of this area particularly challenging. We present and discuss our surgical series highlighting the specific surgical challenges provided by this region of the spine. We have analyzed and reported retrospective data from patients who underwent a posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation between 2011 and 2019 at the Neurosurgical Department of the Geneva University Hospitals. We have discussed C7 and Th1 instrumentation techniques, rods design, extension of constructs, and spinal navigation. Thirty-six patients were enrolled. We have preferentially used lateral mass (LM) screws in the subaxial spine and pedicle screws (PS) in C7, Th1, and upper thoracic spine. We have found no superiority of 3D navigation techniques over 2D fluoroscopy guidance in PS placement accuracy, probably due to the relatively small case series. Surgical site infection was the most frequent complication, significantly associated with tumor as diagnosis. When technically feasible, PS represent the technique of choice for C7 and Th1 instrumentation although other safe techniques are available. Different rod constructs are described although significant differences in biomechanical stability still need to be clarified. Spinal navigation should be used whenever available even though 2D fluoroscopy is still a safe option. Posterior instrumentation of the CTJ is a challenging procedure, but with correct surgical planning and technique, it is safe and effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervicothoracic junction; Lateral mass screw; Pedicle screw; Posterior instrumentation; Rods design; Spinal navigation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33754193     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01520-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  24 in total

1.  Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs.

Authors:  Bradley J Dunlap; Eldin E Karaikovic; Hyung-Soon Park; Mark J Sokolowski; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy.

Authors:  Mohammed Eleraky; Matthias Setzer; Ali A Baaj; Ioannis Papanastassiou; Bryan P Conrad; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-11

3.  Free-hand placement of high thoracic pedicle screws with the aid of fluoroscopy: evaluation of positioning by CT scans in a four-year consecutive series.

Authors:  Bruno Perocco Braga; Josaphat Vilela de Morais; Marcelo Duarte Vilela
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.420

4.  Pedicle screw fixation of the C7 vertebra using an anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging technique.

Authors:  Shaunak Desai; Anil Sethi; Christopher C Ninh; Stephen Bartol; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Takigawa Tomoyuki; Ashish Jain; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Posterior Rigid Instrumentation of C7: Surgical Considerations and Biomechanics at the Cervicothoracic Junction. A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ahmed B Bayoumi; Ibrahim E Efe; Selim Berk; Ekkehard M Kasper; Zafer Orkun Toktas; Deniz Konya
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bledsoe; Doug Fenton; Jeremy L Fogelson; Eric W Nottmeier
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction in Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin T Huang; Maya Harary; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; John H Chi
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Riccardo Cecchinato; Pedro Berjano; Alberto Zerbi; Marco Damilano; Andrea Redaelli; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Byoung Hun Lee; Jong-Hwa Park; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-12-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Strategy and Efficacy of Surgery for Congenital Cervicothoracic Scoliosis with or without Hemivertebra Osteotomy.

Authors:  Hong-Qi Zhang; Yu-Xuan Du; Jin-Yang Liu; Ang Deng; Jian-Huang Wu; Yu-Xiang Wang; Chao-Feng Guo
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.