Literature DB >> 33754068

Intratumor heterogeneity of breast cancer detected by epialleles shows association with hypoxic microenvironment.

Yihan Wang1, Yan Zhang2,3, Yan Huang3, Chuangeng Chen3, Xingda Zhang4, Ying Xing5, Yue Gu3, Mengyan Zhang3, Li Cai5, Shouping Xu4, Baoqing Sun2.   

Abstract

Rationale: In breast cancer, high intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity can lead to drug-resistant, metastasis and poor prognosis of tumors, which increases the complexity of cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, most studies are limited to average DNA methylation level of individual CpGs and ignore heterogeneous DNA methylation patterns of cell subpopulations within the tumor. Thus, quantifying the variability in DNA methylation pattern in sequencing reads is valuable for understanding intratumor heterogeneity.
Methods: We performed Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing and RNA sequencing for tumor core and tumor periphery regions within one breast tumor. By developing a method named "epialleJS" based on Jensen-Shannon divergence, we detected the differential epialleles between tumor core and tumor periphery (CPDEs). We then explored the correlation between intratumor methylation heterogeneity and hypoxic microenvironment in TCGA breast cancer cohort.
Results: More than 70% of CPDEs had higher epipolymorphism in tumor core than tumor periphery, and these CPDEs had lower methylation in tumor core. The CPDEs with lower methylation in tumor core may associate with hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Moreover, we identified a signature of five hypoxia-related DNA methylation markers which can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients, including a CpG site cg15190451 in gene SLC16A5. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that the expression of SLC16A5 was associated with clinicopathological characteristics and survival of breast cancer patients. Conclusions: The analysis of intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity based on epialleles reveals that disordered methylation patterns in tumor core are associated with hypoxic microenvironment, which provides a framework for understanding biological heterogeneous behavior and guidance for developing effective treatment schemes for breast cancer patients. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; epiallele; hypoxic microenvironment.; intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity; methylation patterns

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33754068      PMCID: PMC7977462          DOI: 10.7150/thno.53737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.556


  55 in total

Review 1.  Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel; Arnulf Mayer
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 2.  The regulatory mechanisms of intragenic DNA methylation.

Authors:  Sun-Min Lee; Won-Young Choi; Jungwoo Lee; Young-Joon Kim
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.778

3.  GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions.

Authors:  Cory Y McLean; Dave Bristor; Michael Hiller; Shoa L Clarke; Bruce T Schaar; Craig B Lowe; Aaron M Wenger; Gill Bejerano
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Immunological mechanisms of the antitumor effects of supplemental oxygenation.

Authors:  Stephen M Hatfield; Jorgen Kjaergaard; Dmitriy Lukashev; Taylor H Schreiber; Bryan Belikoff; Robert Abbott; Shalini Sethumadhavan; Phaethon Philbrook; Kami Ko; Ryan Cannici; Molly Thayer; Scott Rodig; Jeffrey L Kutok; Edwin K Jackson; Barry Karger; Eckhard R Podack; Akio Ohta; Michail V Sitkovsky
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response.

Authors:  Melissa R Junttila; Frederic J de Sauvage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Hypoxia and metabolism. Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability.

Authors:  Robert G Bristow; Richard P Hill
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ash A Alizadeh; Victoria Aranda; Alberto Bardelli; Cedric Blanpain; Christoph Bock; Christine Borowski; Carlos Caldas; Andrea Califano; Michael Doherty; Markus Elsner; Manel Esteller; Rebecca Fitzgerald; Jan O Korbel; Peter Lichter; Christopher E Mason; Nicholas Navin; Dana Pe'er; Kornelia Polyak; Charles W M Roberts; Lillian Siu; Alexandra Snyder; Hannah Stower; Charles Swanton; Roel G W Verhaak; Jean C Zenklusen; Johannes Zuber; Jessica Zucman-Rossi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Roadmap of DNA methylation in breast cancer identifies novel prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Bernardo P de Almeida; Joana Dias Apolónio; Alexandra Binnie; Pedro Castelo-Branco
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  New Insights into the Implication of Epigenetic Alterations in the EMT of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Noura Khaled; Yannick Bidet
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  MMP-9 overexpression is associated with intragenic hypermethylation of MMP9 gene in melanoma.

Authors:  Luca Falzone; Rossella Salemi; Salvatore Travali; Aurora Scalisi; James A McCubrey; Saverio Candido; Massimo Libra
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.682

View more
  1 in total

1.  Orthotopic Versus Allotopic Implantation: Comparison of Radiological and Pathological Characteristics.

Authors:  YeYu Cai; TaiLi Chen; JiaYi Liu; ShuHui Peng; Huan Liu; Min Lv; ZhuYuan Ding; ZiYi Zhou; Lan Li; Shan Zeng; EnHua Xiao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.119

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.