Literature DB >> 33753994

Corpora Cavernos invasion vs. Corpus Spongiosum invasion in Penile Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zaishang Li1,2,3, Xueying Li4, Wayne Lam5, Yabing Cao6, Jiunhung Geng7,8,9, Antonio Augusto Ornellas10, Fangjian Zhou11,12,13, Hui Han11,12,13.   

Abstract

Objective: Changes were made in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system according to cavernosum invasion for penile squamous cell carcinoma. This study aimed to determine the difference of prognostic validity between corpora cavernosa (CC) invasion and corpus spongiosum (CS) invasion.
Methods: In this study, we searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase to select English-language articles until July 15, 2020. Pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were performed.
Results: Eleven studies including 3692 cases were included in the final ananlysis (1431 cases with CC and 1360 cases with CS). According to the anatomical structure, the pooled results demonstrated that patients with CC invasion had a similar rate of LNM to those with CS invasion (OR 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.86; P=0.076). However, patients with CC invasion had a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) than those with CS invasion according to the 8th edition tumor stage (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.21; P<0.001). Regarding survival, patients with CS invasion obtained a significantly better cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96; P=0.030), but not in overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.30; 95% CI, 0.52-3.20; P=0.585) than those with CC invasion. No a significant publication bias was observed by Begg's and Egger's tests. Conclusions: The systematic comparison suggests that patients with CS invasion had better CSS than those with CC invasion. CC invasion was associated with a high risk of LNM. The conclusions should be validated by large-scale studies. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node metastasis; meta-analysis; penile cancer; prognosis; stage

Year:  2021        PMID: 33753994      PMCID: PMC7974529          DOI: 10.7150/jca.56504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


  17 in total

1.  Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes.

Authors:  E Solsona; I Iborra; J Rubio; J L Casanova; J V Ricós; C Calabuig
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  External validation of the proposed T and N categories of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Amr Al-Najar; Ibrahim Alkatout; Sakhr Al-Sanabani; Joanna Beate Korda; Axel Hegele; Christian Bolenz; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Carsten Maik Naumann
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  [TNM classification of malignant tumors: the new 1987 edition].

Authors:  P Hermanek; O Scheibe; B Spiessl; G Wagner
Journal:  Radiobiol Radiother (Berl)       Date:  1987

4.  Prognosis of the 8th TNM Staging System for Penile Cancer and Refinement of Prognostication by Incorporating High Risk Human Papillomavirus Status.

Authors:  Beihe Wang; Weijie Gu; Fangning Wan; Yu Wei; Wenjun Xiao; Xiaolin Lu; Guiming Zhang; Jiaquan Zhou; Qifeng Wang; Xuefei Ding; Mounsif Azizi; Philippe E Spiess; DingWei Ye; Yao Zhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Filiberto Zattoni; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Tommaso Prayer Galetti; Lucio Luciani; Andrea Fandella; Stefano Guazzieri; Daniele Maruzzi; Teodoro Sava; Salvatore Siracusano; Stefania Pilloni; Andrea Tasca; Guido Martignoni; Marina Gardiman; Regina Tardanico; Tiziano Zambolin; Antonio Cisternino; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic factors for occult inguinal lymph node involvement in penile carcinoma and assessment of the high-risk EAU subgroup: a two-institution analysis of 342 clinically node-negative patients.

Authors:  Niels M Graafland; Wayne Lam; Joost A P Leijte; Tet Yap; Maarten P W Gallee; Cathy Corbishley; Erik van Werkhoven; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Evolving insights into penile cancer pathology and the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system.

Authors:  Diego F Sanchez; Maria Jose Fernandez-Nestosa; Sofia Cañete-Portillo; Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Maarten Gallee; Ninja Antonini; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  SOD2 immunoexpression predicts lymph node metastasis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Lara Termini; José H Fregnani; Enrique Boccardo; Walter H da Costa; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Maria A Andreoli; Maria C Costa; Ademar Lopes; Isabela W da Cunha; Fernando A Soares; Luisa L Villa; Gustavo C Guimarães
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-03-03

10.  Predictors of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Jiao Hu; Yu Cui; Peihua Liu; Xu Zhou; Wenbiao Ren; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.