Literature DB >> 15856474

Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data.

Vincenzo Ficarra1, Filiberto Zattoni, Sergio Cosciani Cunico, Tommaso Prayer Galetti, Lucio Luciani, Andrea Fandella, Stefano Guazzieri, Daniele Maruzzi, Teodoro Sava, Salvatore Siracusano, Stefania Pilloni, Andrea Tasca, Guido Martignoni, Marina Gardiman, Regina Tardanico, Tiziano Zambolin, Antonio Cisternino, Walter Artibani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to identify independent clinical and pathologic variables that were predictive of lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in a multicenter series with the intent to select patients who were suitable to undergo immediate inguinal lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 175 patients who underwent surgery for penile carcinoma in 11 urologic centers participating in the Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer Data Base. Pathologically positive lymph nodes were defined as the presence of histologically confirmed lymph node metastasis in patients who underwent either immediate or delayed inguinal and/or pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who had clinically positive lymph nodes with cytologically positive fine-needle aspiration results and who had not undergone lymphadenectomy were censored.
RESULTS: Overall, lymph-node involvement was observed in 71 of 175 patients (40.6%) included in the analyses. After analyzing the whole group of patients, the following variables were identified as independent predictors of pathologic lymph node metastasis: clinical lymph node status, pathologic stage of the primary tumor, venous and lymphatic embolizations, and histologic grade. In the subgroup of patients with clinically negative lymph nodes, tumor thickness, histologic grade, lymphatic and venous embolizations, infiltration of both corpus spongiosum and urethra, and pathologic stage of the primary tumor (according to the 1997 TNM classification system) were predictive of lymph node involvement on univariate analysis. The generated logistic regression model showed that venous and/or lymphatic embolizations and infiltration of the corpus spongiosum and/or urethra were independent predictors of pathologic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically negative lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Venous and/or lymphatic embolizations played relevant roles as predictors of pathologic lymph node involvement in patients with penile neoplasia and should be considered important parameters in determining which patients with clinically negative lymph nodes should undergo immediate lymphadenectomy. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856474     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

Authors:  X Melody Qu; D Robert Siemens; Alexander V Louie; Darwin Yip; Aamer Mahmud
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [The significance of lymphadenectomy in the management of penile cancer].

Authors:  M Angerer-Shpilenya; G Jakse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL): Minimally Invasive Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Technique.

Authors:  Rawal Sudhir; Raghunath S Krishnappa; Samir Khanna; R Sekon; Rakesh Koul
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-04

4.  Distal urethrectomy for localized penile squamous carcinoma in situ extending into the urethra: an updated series.

Authors:  J A Pedrosa; S P Amstutz; R Bihrle; M J Mellon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  The expression of metaloproteinases-2 and -9 is different according to the patterns of growth and invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Fernando A Soares; Isabela Werneck da Cunha; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Sueli Nonogaki; Rodrigo Sousa Madeira Campos; Ademar Lopes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  What next? Managing lymph nodes in men with penile cancer.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  How accurate are present risk group assignment tools in penile cancer?

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; G Novara; R Boscolo-Berto; W Artibani; M W Kattan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Extra-anatomical transobturator bypass graft for femoral artery involvement by metastatic carcinoma of the penis: report of five patients.

Authors:  Ubirajara Ferreira; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Lia Yumi Ikari; Walter da Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Rafael Mamprim Stopiglia; Fábio Husseman Menezes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  The role of pathologic prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.