An S De Vriese1,2, Rogier Caluwé3, Hans Van Der Meersch4, Koen De Boeck5, Dirk De Bacquer6. 1. Division of Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Bruges, Belgium an.devriese@azsintjan.be. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Division of Nephrology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium. 4. Division of Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Bruges, Belgium. 5. Division of Nephrology, ZNA Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. 6. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with normal renal function or early stage CKD, the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients on hemodialysis, the comparative efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs are unknown. METHODS: In the Valkyrie study, 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation were randomized to a VKA with a target INR of 2-3, 10 mg rivaroxaban daily, or rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 for 18 months. Patients continued the originally assigned treatment and follow-up was extended for at least an additional 18 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Secondary efficacy end points were individual components of the composite outcome and all-cause death. Safety end points were life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding. RESULTS: Median (IQR) follow-up was 1.88 (1.01-3.38) years. Premature, permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation occurred in 25% of patients. The primary end point occurred at a rate of 63.8 per 100 person-years in the VKA group, 26.2 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group, and 21.4 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group. The estimated competing risk-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary end point was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68; P=0.0006) in the rivaroxaban group and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.61; P=0.0003) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group, compared with the VKA group. Death from any cause, cardiac death, and risk of stroke were not different between the treatment arms, but symptomatic limb ischemia occurred significantly less frequently with rivaroxaban than with VKA. After adjustment for competing risk of death, the hazard ratio for life-threatening and major bleeding compared with the VKA group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.90; P=0.03) in the rivaroxaban group, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.08; P=0.08) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85; P=0.02) in the pooled rivaroxaban groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation, a reduced dose of rivaroxaban significantly decreased the composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications compared with VKA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Oral Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis, NCT03799822.
BACKGROUND: In patients with normal renal function or early stage CKD, the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients on hemodialysis, the comparative efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs are unknown. METHODS: In the Valkyrie study, 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation were randomized to a VKA with a target INR of 2-3, 10 mg rivaroxaban daily, or rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 for 18 months. Patients continued the originally assigned treatment and follow-up was extended for at least an additional 18 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Secondary efficacy end points were individual components of the composite outcome and all-cause death. Safety end points were life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding. RESULTS: Median (IQR) follow-up was 1.88 (1.01-3.38) years. Premature, permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation occurred in 25% of patients. The primary end point occurred at a rate of 63.8 per 100 person-years in the VKA group, 26.2 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group, and 21.4 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group. The estimated competing risk-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary end point was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68; P=0.0006) in the rivaroxaban group and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.61; P=0.0003) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group, compared with the VKA group. Death from any cause, cardiac death, and risk of stroke were not different between the treatment arms, but symptomatic limb ischemia occurred significantly less frequently with rivaroxaban than with VKA. After adjustment for competing risk of death, the hazard ratio for life-threatening and major bleeding compared with the VKA group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.90; P=0.03) in the rivaroxaban group, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.08; P=0.08) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85; P=0.02) in the pooled rivaroxaban groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation, a reduced dose of rivaroxaban significantly decreased the composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications compared with VKA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Oral Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis, NCT03799822.
Authors: Konstantinos C Siontis; Xiaosong Zhang; Ashley Eckard; Nicole Bhave; Douglas E Schaubel; Kevin He; Anca Tilea; Austin G Stack; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Xiaoxi Yao; Peter A Noseworthy; Nilay D Shah; Rajiv Saran; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Keith A A Fox; John W Eikelboom; Olga Shestakovska; Stuart J Connolly; Kaj P Metsarinne; Salim Yusuf Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeffrey T Ha; Brendon L Neuen; Lap P Cheng; Min Jun; Tadashi Toyama; Martin P Gallagher; Meg J Jardine; Manish M Sood; Amit X Garg; Suetonia C Palmer; Patrick B Mark; David C Wheeler; Vivekanand Jha; Ben Freedman; David W Johnson; Vlado Perkovic; Sunil V Badve Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Thomas A Mavrakanas; Caroline F Samer; Sharon J Nessim; Gershon Frisch; Mark L Lipman Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sean D Pokorney; Eric Black-Maier; Anne S Hellkamp; Daniel J Friedman; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Granger; Laine Thomas; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mandeep S Randhawa; Rohanlal Vishwanath; Manoj P Rai; Ling Wang; Amritpal K Randhawa; George Abela; Gaurav Dhar Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-04-01
Authors: Carlo Lavalle; Marco Valerio Mariani; Agostino Piro; Michele Magnocavallo; Giampaolo Vetta; Sara Trivigno; Giovanni Battista Forleo; Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca; Massimo Uguccioni; Vincenzo Russo; Francesco Summaria; Luca Di Lullo Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-04 Impact factor: 4.964