Darrell H S Tan1,2,3,4,5, Adrienne K Chan6,7,8, Peter Jüni6,7,9, George Tomlinson10, Nick Daneman6,8, Sharon Walmsley6,11,7, Matthew Muller12,6, Rob Fowler6,7,13, Srinivas Murthy14, Natasha Press15, Curtis Cooper16, Todd Lee17, Tony Mazzulli18,19, Allison McGeer6,18. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. darrell.tan@gmail.com. 2. MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. darrell.tan@gmail.com. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. darrell.tan@gmail.com. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. darrell.tan@gmail.com. 5. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. darrell.tan@gmail.com. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 7. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 8. Division of Infectious Diseases, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 9. Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 10. Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 11. Division of Infectious Diseases, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 12. Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 13. Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 14. Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 15. Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. 16. Division of Infectious Diseases, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 17. Division of Infectious Diseases, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. 18. Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital/University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 19. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a well-established strategy for the prevention of infectious diseases, in which recently exposed people take a short course of medication to prevent infection. The primary objective of the COVID-19 Ring-based Prevention Trial with lopinavir/ritonavir (CORIPREV-LR) is to evaluate the efficacy of a 14-day course of oral lopinavir/ritonavir as PEP against COVID-19 among individuals with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed case. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicenter, 1:1 cluster-randomized trial of LPV/r 800/200 mg twice daily for 14 days (intervention arm) versus no intervention (control arm), using an adaptive approach to sample size calculation. Participants will be individuals aged > 6 months with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case within the past 7 days. A combination of remote and in-person study visits at days 1, 7, 14, 35, and 90 includes comprehensive epidemiological, clinical, microbiologic, and serologic sampling. The primary outcome is microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 infection within 14 days after exposure, defined as a positive respiratory tract specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction. Secondary outcomes include safety, symptomatic COVID-19, seropositivity, hospitalization, respiratory failure requiring ventilator support, mortality, psychological impact, and health-related quality of life. Additional analyses will examine the impact of LPV/r on these outcomes in the subset of participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. To detect a relative risk reduction of 40% with 80% power at α = 0.05, assuming the secondary attack rate in ring members (p0) = 15%, 5 contacts per case and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.05, we require 110 clusters per arm, or 220 clusters overall and approximately 1220 enrollees after accounting for 10% loss-to-follow-up. We will modify the sample size target after 60 clusters, based on preliminary estimates of p0, ICC, and cluster size and consider switching to an alternative drug after interim analyses and as new data emerges. The primary analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model with logit link to estimate the effect of LPV/r on the probability of infection. Participants who test positive at baseline will be excluded from the primary analysis but will be maintained for additional analyses to examine the impact of LPV/r on early treatment. DISCUSSION: Harnessing safe, existing drugs such as LPV/r as PEP could provide an important tool for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel aspects of our design include the ring-based prevention approach, and the incorporation of remote strategies for conducting study visits and biospecimen collection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04321174 ) on March 25, 2020.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a well-established strategy for the prevention of infectious diseases, in which recently exposed people take a short course of medication to prevent infection. The primary objective of the COVID-19 Ring-based Prevention Trial with lopinavir/ritonavir (CORIPREV-LR) is to evaluate the efficacy of a 14-day course of oral lopinavir/ritonavir as PEP against COVID-19 among individuals with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed case. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicenter, 1:1 cluster-randomized trial of LPV/r 800/200 mg twice daily for 14 days (intervention arm) versus no intervention (control arm), using an adaptive approach to sample size calculation. Participants will be individuals aged > 6 months with a high-risk exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case within the past 7 days. A combination of remote and in-person study visits at days 1, 7, 14, 35, and 90 includes comprehensive epidemiological, clinical, microbiologic, and serologic sampling. The primary outcome is microbiologically confirmed COVID-19infection within 14 days after exposure, defined as a positive respiratory tract specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction. Secondary outcomes include safety, symptomatic COVID-19, seropositivity, hospitalization, respiratory failure requiring ventilator support, mortality, psychological impact, and health-related quality of life. Additional analyses will examine the impact of LPV/r on these outcomes in the subset of participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. To detect a relative risk reduction of 40% with 80% power at α = 0.05, assuming the secondary attack rate in ring members (p0) = 15%, 5 contacts per case and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.05, we require 110 clusters per arm, or 220 clusters overall and approximately 1220 enrollees after accounting for 10% loss-to-follow-up. We will modify the sample size target after 60 clusters, based on preliminary estimates of p0, ICC, and cluster size and consider switching to an alternative drug after interim analyses and as new data emerges. The primary analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model with logit link to estimate the effect of LPV/r on the probability of infection. Participants who test positive at baseline will be excluded from the primary analysis but will be maintained for additional analyses to examine the impact of LPV/r on early treatment. DISCUSSION: Harnessing safe, existing drugs such as LPV/r as PEP could provide an important tool for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel aspects of our design include the ring-based prevention approach, and the incorporation of remote strategies for conducting study visits and biospecimen collection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04321174 ) on March 25, 2020.
Authors: Adriaan H de Wilde; Dirk Jochmans; Clara C Posthuma; Jessika C Zevenhoven-Dobbe; Stefan van Nieuwkoop; Theo M Bestebroer; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Johan Neyts; Eric J Snijder Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: R L Murphy; S Brun; C Hicks; J J Eron; R Gulick; M King; A C White; C Benson; M Thompson; H A Kessler; S Hammer; R Bertz; A Hsu; A Japour; E Sun Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-01-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Margaret A Johnson; Joseph C Gathe; Daniel Podzamczer; Jean-Michel Molina; Christian T Naylor; Yi-Lin Chiu; Martin S King; Thomas J Podsadecki; George J Hanna; Scott C Brun Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Joseph Gathe; Barbara A da Silva; Daniel E Cohen; Mona R Loutfy; Daniel Podzamczer; Rafael Rubio; Sara Gibbs; Theresa Marsh; Christian Naylor; Linda Fredrick; Barry Bernstein Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sharon Walmsley; Barry Bernstein; Martin King; José Arribas; Gildon Beall; Peter Ruane; Margaret Johnson; David Johnson; Richard Lalonde; Anthony Japour; Scott Brun; Eugene Sun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Y Park; J S Lee; J S Son; J H Ko; K R Peck; Y Jung; H J Woo; Y S Joo; J S Eom; H Shi Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Niklaus D Labhardt; Mikaela Smit; Ianis Petignat; Thomas Perneger; Annalisa Marinosci; Pilar Ustero; Maria Pia Diniz Ribeiro; Silvio Ragozzino; Giovanni Jacopo Nicoletti; Pietro Benedetto Faré; Diego O Andrey; Frederique Jacquerioz; Dan Lebowitz; Thomas Agoritsas; Benjamin Meyer; Hervé Spechbach; Julien Salamun; Idris Guessous; François Chappuis; Laurent Kaiser; Laurent Arthur Decosterd; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Enos Bernasconi; Sandra Wagner Cardoso; Alexandra Calmy; For The Copep Study Team Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-11-06