Literature DB >> 33752730

Radiographic analysis of specific morphometrics and patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS) for surgical repair of zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures.

Rusheel Nayak1, Joshua Barrett2, Milap S Patel2, Mauricio P Barbosa3, Anish R Kadakia2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures are often treated with intramedullary fixation due to an increased risk of nonunion. A previous 3-dimensional (3D) computerized tomography (CT) imaging study by our group determined that the screw should stop short of the bow of the metatarsal and be larger than the commonly used 4.5 millimeter (mm) screw. This study determines how these guidelines translate to operative outcomes, measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) surveys. Radiographic variables measuring the height of the medial longitudinal arch and degree of metatarsus adductus were also obtained to determine if these measurements had any effect on outcomes. And lastly, this study aimed to determine if morphologic differences between males and females affected surgical outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 23 patients (14 male, 9 female) who met inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients completed PROMIS surveys. Preoperative PROMIS surveys were completed prior to surgery, rather than retroactively. Weightbearing radiographs were also obtained preoperatively to assist with surgical planning and postoperatively to assess interval healing. Correlation coefficients were calculated between PROMIS scores and repair characteristics (hardware characteristics [screw length and diameter] and radiographic measurements of specific morphometric features). T tests determined the relationship between repair characteristics, PROMIS scores, and incidence of operative complications. PROMIS scores and correlation coefficients were also stratified by gender.
RESULTS: The average screw length and diameter adhered to guidelines from our previous study. Preoperatively, mean PROMIS PI = 57.26±11.03 and PROMIS PF = 42.27±15.45 after injury. Postoperatively, PROMIS PI = 44.15±7.36 and PROMIS PF = 57.22±10.93. Patients with complications had significantly worse postoperative PROMIS PF scores (p=0.0151) and PROMIS PI scores (p=0.003) compared to patients without complications. Females had non-significantly worse preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores compared to males and had a higher complication rate (33 percent versus 21 percent, respectively). Metatarsus adductus angle was shown to exhibit a significant moderate inverse relationship with postoperative PROMIS PF scores in the overall cohort (r=-0.478; p=0.045). Metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.606; p=0.008), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.592; p=0.01), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.529; p=0.024) demonstrated significant inverse relationships with change in PROMIS PF scores for the overall cohort. Within the male subcohort, significant relationships were found between the change in PROMIS PF and metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.7526; p=0.005), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.7539; p=0.005), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.627; p=0.029).
CONCLUSION: Patients treated according to guidelines from our prior study achieved satisfactory patient reported and radiographic outcomes. Screws larger than 4.5mm did not lead to hardware complications, including screw failure, iatrogenic fractures, or cortical blowouts. Females had non-significantly lower preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores and were more likely to suffer complications compared to males. Patients with complications, higher arched feet, or greater metatarsus adductus angles had worse functional outcomes. Future studies should better characterize whether patients with excessive lateral column loading benefit from an off-loading cavus orthotic or plantar-lateral plating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Intramedullary screw fixation; Jones fracture; PROMIS; Pain interference; Patient-reported outcomes; Physical function; Proximal fifth metatarsal fracture

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752730      PMCID: PMC7986515          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02331-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  19 in total

1.  Anatomical and radiological considerations of the fifth metatarsal bone.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; S P Haman; J Lu; T G Padanilam; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  The Epidemiology of Fifth Metatarsal Fracture.

Authors:  Justin M Kane; Kristin Sandrowski; Heather Saffel; Anthony Albanese; Steven M Raikin; David I Pedowitz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2015-02-09

3.  Radiographic study of the fifth metatarsal for optimal intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fracture.

Authors:  George Ochenjele; Bryant Ho; Paul J Switaj; Daniel Fuchs; Nitin Goyal; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  M P Pietropaoli; D C Wnorowski; F W Werner; M D Fortino
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures.

Authors:  I P Kelly; R R Glisson; C Fink; M E Easley; J A Nunley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Intramedullary screw fixation of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  S N Shah; G O Knoblich; D P Lindsey; J Kreshak; S A Yerby; L B Chou
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Demographics and outcome of metatarsal fractures.

Authors:  H Cakir; S T Van Vliet-Koppert; E M M Van Lieshout; M R De Vries; M Van Der Elst; T Schepers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The epidemiology of metatarsal fractures.

Authors:  Brad A Petrisor; Ingri Ekrol; Charles Court-Brown
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 9.  Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Anatomy, Classification, Treatment and Complications.

Authors:  Chi Nok Cheung; Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2016-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.