Literature DB >> 33752664

Healthcare professionals' perceptions about interprofessional teamwork: a national survey within Swedish child healthcare services.

Ulrika Svea Nygren1,2, Ylva Tindberg3,4, Leif Eriksson5, Ulf Larsson3, Håkan Sandberg6, Lena Nordgren5,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, interprofessional teamwork is described as a key method to promote health and prevent illness in children, namely, to achieve the goals of Child Healthcare Services (CHS). However, how teamwork should be designed within CHS to achieve the goals is unclear. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' perceptions about 1) taking part in interprofessional teamwork, 2) team characteristics, and 3) whether the perceptions were related to professional affiliation or workplace.
METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based study-specific questionnaire sent to all accessible nurses, physicians, and psychologists in Swedish CHS (n = 3552). The response rate was 31.5%. To identify possible associations, logistic regressions were conducted.
RESULTS: Almost all respondents, 1096/1119 (97.9%), reported taking part in some type of interprofessional teamwork within the Swedish CHS. Among those, the most common was team-based visits (82.2%). It was perceived that performing team-based visits resulted in fulfilled goals, expertise exceeding individual team members' competences, provision of high-quality care, and meeting children's and families' needs, to a greater extent, than if not performing team-based visits. Correspondingly, working as a team in parental groups was perceived as resulting in fulfilled goals, meeting the needs of children and their families, and continuity within the team to a greater extent than if not working together in a team. Professional affiliation was associated with different perceptions and types of teamwork. Family Centers were positively associated with all types of teamwork as well as continuity within the team.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals' perceptions about team characteristics were associated with professional affiliation, workplace, and type of teamwork (defined as team activities) within the CHS. Professionals within Swedish CHS, taking part in team-based visits and in interprofessional teamwork in parental groups, perceived that the team fulfilled its goals and met the needs of children and families to a greater extent than professionals not taking part in these types of teamwork. Professionals at Family Centers were more likely to work in teams in different ways. Knowledge about interprofessional teamwork for individuals and groups in Swedish CHS might also be valuable in other healthcare settings, dealing with complex needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child healthcare services; Cross-sectional survey; Family center; Interprofessional teamwork; Parental groups; Team-based visit

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752664      PMCID: PMC7983257          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06139-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  39 in total

1.  All professionals are equal but some professionals are more equal than others? Dominance, status and efficiency in Swedish interprofessional teams.

Authors:  Ingela Thylefors
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  The concept of collaborative health.

Authors:  Håkan Sandberg
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.338

Review 3.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Measuring teamwork in health care settings: a review of survey instruments.

Authors:  Melissa A Valentine; Ingrid M Nembhard; Amy C Edmondson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Lloyd P Provost; Craig M Froehle; Peter A Margolis
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Child health care uptake among low-income and immigrant families in a Swedish county.

Authors:  T Wallby; A Hjern
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Nurse-physician collaboration in an academic medical centre: The influence of organisational and individual factors.

Authors:  Darci Bowles; Georgia McIntosh; Reena Hemrajani; Miao-Shan Yen; Allison Phillips; Nathan Schwartz; Shin-Ping Tu; Alan W Dow
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.338

9.  Feasibility and Impact of Doctor-Nurse Task Delegation in Preventive Child Health Care in the Netherlands, a Controlled Before-After Study.

Authors:  S Janine Benjamins; Maurice L W Damen; Henk F van Stel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improving team-based care for children: shared well child care involving family practice nurses.

Authors:  Grace Warmels; Sharon Johnston; Jolanda Turley
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.