Literature DB >> 33751237

Can genetic engineering-based methods for gene function identification be eclipsed by genome editing in plants? A comparison of methodologies.

P P Amritha1, Jasmine M Shah2.   

Abstract

Finding and explaining the functions of genes in plants have promising applications in crop improvement and bioprospecting and hence, it is important to compare various techniques available for gene function identification in plants. Today, the most popular technology among researchers to identify the functions of genes is the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9)-based genome editing method. But by no means can we say that CRISPR/Cas9 is the go-to method for all purposes. It comes with its own baggage. Researchers will agree and have lived through at least seven more technologies deployed to find the functions of genes, which come under three umbrellas: 1. genetic engineering, 2. transient expression, and 3. chemical/physical mutagenesis. Each of the methods evolved when the previous one ran into an insurmountable problem. In this review, we compare the eight technologies against one another on 14 parameters. This review lays bare the pros and cons, and similarities and dissimilarities of various methods. Every method comes with its advantages and disadvantages. For example, the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing is an excellent method for modifying gene sequences, creating allelic versions of genes, thereby aiding the understanding of gene function. But it comes with the baggage of unwanted or off-target mutations. Then, we have methods based on random or targeted knockout of the gene, knockdown, and overexpression of the gene. Targeted disruption of genes is required for complete knockout of gene function, which may not be accomplished by editing. We have also discussed the strategies to overcome the shortcomings of the targeted gene-knockout and the CRISPR/Cas9-based methods. This review serves as a comprehensive guide towards the understanding and comparison of various technologies available for gene function identification in plants and hence, it will find application for crop improvement and bioprospecting related research.

Keywords:  Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9); Gene targeting; Genome editing; Homologous recombination; Off-target mutations; Plant genetic engineering; Tal effector nuclease; Zinc finger nuclease

Year:  2021        PMID: 33751237     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-021-01769-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  87 in total

Review 1.  The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond.

Authors:  Luisa Bortesi; Rainer Fischer
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  Francisella novicida Cas9 interrogates genomic DNA with very high specificity and can be used for mammalian genome editing.

Authors:  Sundaram Acharya; Arpit Mishra; Deepanjan Paul; Asgar Hussain Ansari; Mohd Azhar; Manoj Kumar; Riya Rauthan; Namrata Sharma; Meghali Aich; Dipanjali Sinha; Saumya Sharma; Shivani Jain; Arjun Ray; Suman Jain; Sivaprakash Ramalingam; Souvik Maiti; Debojyoti Chakraborty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficient Gene Targeting in Maize Using Inducible CRISPR-Cas9 and Marker-free Donor Template.

Authors:  Pierluigi Barone; Emily Wu; Brian Lenderts; Ajith Anand; William Gordon-Kamm; Sergei Svitashev; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila with zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Kelly Beumer; Gargi Bhattacharyya; Marina Bibikova; Jonathan K Trautman; Dana Carroll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Transient transformation of Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts: a versatile experimental system to study gene expression.

Authors:  S Abel; A Theologis
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors.

Authors:  Jens Boch; Heidi Scholze; Sebastian Schornack; Angelika Landgraf; Simone Hahn; Sabine Kay; Thomas Lahaye; Anja Nickstadt; Ulla Bonas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  José M Alonso; Anna N Stepanova; Thomas J Leisse; Christopher J Kim; Huaming Chen; Paul Shinn; Denise K Stevenson; Justin Zimmerman; Pascual Barajas; Rosa Cheuk; Carmelita Gadrinab; Collen Heller; Albert Jeske; Eric Koesema; Cristina C Meyers; Holly Parker; Lance Prednis; Yasser Ansari; Nathan Choy; Hashim Deen; Michael Geralt; Nisha Hazari; Emily Hom; Meagan Karnes; Celene Mulholland; Ral Ndubaku; Ian Schmidt; Plinio Guzman; Laura Aguilar-Henonin; Markus Schmid; Detlef Weigel; David E Carter; Trudy Marchand; Eddy Risseeuw; Debra Brogden; Albana Zeko; William L Crosby; Charles C Berry; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genome-wide analysis of mutations in mutant lineages selected following fast-neutron irradiation mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Eric J Belfield; Xiangchao Gan; Aziz Mithani; Carly Brown; Caifu Jiang; Keara Franklin; Elizabeth Alvey; Anjar Wibowo; Marko Jung; Kit Bailey; Sharan Kalwani; Jiannis Ragoussis; Richard Mott; Nicholas P Harberd
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System.

Authors:  Leena Arora; Alka Narula
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Peyton B Randolph; Jessie R Davis; Alexander A Sousa; Luke W Koblan; Jonathan M Levy; Peter J Chen; Christopher Wilson; Gregory A Newby; Aditya Raguram; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Planta Hairy Root Transformation: A Powerful Platform for Functional Analysis of Root Traits in Soybean.

Authors:  Mohsen Niazian; François Belzile; Davoud Torkamaneh
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.