Cassandra A Kersten1,2,3, Allison T Chamberlain2, Sherry Everett Jones4, Amra Uzicanin1, Faruque Ahmed1. 1. Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA. 3. Booz Allen Hamilton, Falls Church, VA, USA. 4. Division of Adolescent and School Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe school district preparedness for school closures and other relevant strategies before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 957 public school districts from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia were surveyed between October 2015 and August 2016. The response rates for the questionnaires were as follows: Healthy and Safe School Environment, Crisis Preparedness Module (60%; N = 572), Nutrition Services (63%; N = 599), and Health Services (64%; N = 613). Data were analyzed using descriptive and regression techniques. RESULTS: Most school districts had procedures that would facilitate the implementation of school closures (88.7%). Fewer districts had plans for ensuring continuity of education (43.0%) or feeding students during closure (33.8%). The prevalence of continuity of education plans was lower in the Midwest than the Northeast (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.90). Presence of plans for feeding students was higher in high-poverty than low-poverty districts (aPR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99) and in large districts than small districts (aPR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.37-3.09). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding factors associated with having comprehensive emergency plans could help decision makers to target assistance during the current COVID-19 pandemic and for future planning purposes.
OBJECTIVES: To describe school district preparedness for school closures and other relevant strategies before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 957 public school districts from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia were surveyed between October 2015 and August 2016. The response rates for the questionnaires were as follows: Healthy and Safe School Environment, Crisis Preparedness Module (60%; N = 572), Nutrition Services (63%; N = 599), and Health Services (64%; N = 613). Data were analyzed using descriptive and regression techniques. RESULTS: Most school districts had procedures that would facilitate the implementation of school closures (88.7%). Fewer districts had plans for ensuring continuity of education (43.0%) or feeding students during closure (33.8%). The prevalence of continuity of education plans was lower in the Midwest than the Northeast (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.90). Presence of plans for feeding students was higher in high-poverty than low-poverty districts (aPR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99) and in large districts than small districts (aPR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.37-3.09). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding factors associated with having comprehensive emergency plans could help decision makers to target assistance during the current COVID-19 pandemic and for future planning purposes.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; influenza; influenza pandemic; pandemic preparedness; school closure
Authors: Sonja S Hutchins; Kevin Fiscella; Robert S Levine; Danielle C Ompad; Marian McDonald Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Erin E Epson; Yenlik A Zheteyeva; Jeanette J Rainey; Hongjiang Gao; Jianrong Shi; Amra Uzicanin; Lisa Miller Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Sharafaldeen Bin Nafisah; Aliyah H Alamery; Aminah Al Nafesa; Bakhitah Aleid; Nora A Brazanji Journal: J Infect Public Health Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Min W Fong; Huizhi Gao; Jessica Y Wong; Jingyi Xiao; Eunice Y C Shiu; Sukhyun Ryu; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-17 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Philip Blumenshine; Arthur Reingold; Susan Egerter; Robin Mockenhaupt; Paula Braveman; James Marks Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 6.883