Literature DB >> 33749085

Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Zixiang Cheng1, Yao Sun1,2, Suhua Yang3, Hui Zhi1, Tao Yin1, Xiaojiao Ma1, Haoshan Zhang1, Xianmin Diao1, Yan Guo2, Xinhai Li1, Chuanyin Wu1, Yi Sui1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990SiMTLzzm321990; CRISPR-Cas9; Foxtail millet; haploid embryo

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33749085      PMCID: PMC8196629          DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


× No keyword cloud information.
Foxtail millet (Setaria italica), a member of the Poaceae grass family, is a C4 plant that is grown in arid and semi‐arid regions as a food and fodder crop in dozens of countries including India and China. It was domesticated from the wild species green foxtail (S. viridis) over 8000 years ago and is closely related to several major food, feed and bioenergy grasses including maize, sorghum, sugarcane and switchgrass. Foxtail millet is small in size and its small diploid genome has been sequenced and annotated recently (Bennetzen et al., 2012; Jia et al., 2013), thus increasingly becoming a model for C4 plants. The doubled haploid (DH) technology accelerates stacking and screening of recombinant haplotypes in fixed genetic backgrounds (Jacquier et al., 2020). Establishment of a DH production platform in foxtail millet not only makes breeding programmes more efficient but also extends the toolkit to study complex traits related to C4 crops. To the best of our knowledge, however, there has been no haploid induction system demonstrated in this crop. Here, we report induction of haploid embryo through seed, by CRISPR‐Cas9 mediated mutation of the SiMTL gene, which is orthologous to the maize MATRILINEAL/NOT‐LIKE‐DAD/PHOSPHOLIPASE A (MTL/NLD/ZmPLA) gene (Gilles et al., 2017; Jacquier et al., 2020; Kelliher et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). Maize seed industry has been utilizing inducer lines, derived from Stock 6, to induce haploid embryo formation for decades. The mutated gene behind the major locus responsible for haploid induction (ggi1 – gynogenesis inducer 1 – /qhir1‐qtl for haploid induction rate 1) is MTL/NLD/ZmPLA that encodes a pollen‐specific phospholipase (Gilles et al., 2017; Kelliher et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). MTL/NLD/ZmPLA is conserved in cereal plants and mutation in the unique rice orthologous gene, and in the three wheat orthologous genes enabled haploid embryo induction (Liu et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2018). Those findings prompted us to test the foxtail millet homolog SiMTL (Seita.9G376800) that is even closer to MTL/NLD/ZmPLA (82.0% sequence similarity; see Figure S1 in Yao et al., 2018). We employed the CRISPR‐Cas9 editing system and designed two guide RNA sequences targeting the second and fifth exon, respectively (Figure 1a). The guide RNA expression was driven by the OsU3 promoter and Cas9 was under control of the maize Ubiquitin‐1 promoter. We transformed the variety Ci846 using the Agrobacterium‐mediated method and produced 65 T0 plants. Sequence analysis identified 26 events with the target sites edited at least on one allele (9 for Target 1 and 17 for Target 2), of which 19 were homozygous (same edit type on two alleles) or biallelic (different edit types on two alleles) mutants. We grew T1 plants from five T0 events carrying either homozygous or biallelic mutation of SiMTL that results in either frameshift or early stop (Figure 1b) and observed their seed set rate. Those simtl plants had an average seed set rate of 33.38%, ranking from 25.30% to 40.57% (Figure 1c). The simtl pollens were normal in starch accumulation (Figure 1d), similar to what was seen in rice and wheat (Liu et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2018). We then grew T2 progeny from selfing of three events (#8, #14 and #15), along with wild type plants. Of 321 T2 plants analysed by flow cytometry, we identified nine haploids, at an averaged haploid induction rate (HIR) of 2.8%, whereas no haploid was found among 205 wild type plants (Figure 1e and f). To test ability of the inducer lines to induce haploid embryo in different female parents, a male sterile line 682A was pollinated with pollens from the line #14. Flow cytometry analysis identified six haploid plants among 230 plants from crossing, but there was no haploid plant found among 240 F1 plants from the cross using Ci846 wild type plants as the pollen donor (Figure 1f). Typically, the haploid plants had short stature with smaller size in all organs including leaf, panicle and anther relative to the wild type, and did not set any seed (Figure 1g). The haploid plant from crossing was morphologically similar to the female parent (Figure 1g).
Figure 1

Haploid embryo induction in foxtail millet. (a) Genomic structure of SiMTL and targeted sites for the CRISPR‐Cas9 system. PAM is underlined and the guide RNA sequence is highlighted in blue. (b) Five representative T0 plants edited at guide 1 or guide 2 in SiMTL. The predicted consequence at the protein level resulting from each type of editing is given. (c) Seeds setting rate of the same 5 events. Ten T1 plants were grown for each event. For #3 and #5, only homozygous segregants of +1(A)/+1(A) were used for data collection. **Significant difference between simtl and WT at P < 0.01 by two‐tailed t‐test. (d) Representative pollens from a simtl plant, showing normal starch accumulation relative to WT. (e) Verification of haploid plant by flow cytometry analysis. The x‐axis indicates the signal peak for nuclei and y‐axis indicates the number of nuclei. (f) Haploid induction efficiency (HIR%) determined by self‐pollination or crossing. For crossing, a male sterile line 682A was used as the female and was pollinated with the #14 line. (g) Haploid plant with reduced height and smaller organs relative to WT. A representative haploid plant from crossing, morphologically similar to the female parent, is shown in the lower right panel.

Haploid embryo induction in foxtail millet. (a) Genomic structure of SiMTL and targeted sites for the CRISPR‐Cas9 system. PAM is underlined and the guide RNA sequence is highlighted in blue. (b) Five representative T0 plants edited at guide 1 or guide 2 in SiMTL. The predicted consequence at the protein level resulting from each type of editing is given. (c) Seeds setting rate of the same 5 events. Ten T1 plants were grown for each event. For #3 and #5, only homozygous segregants of +1(A)/+1(A) were used for data collection. **Significant difference between simtl and WT at P < 0.01 by two‐tailed t‐test. (d) Representative pollens from a simtl plant, showing normal starch accumulation relative to WT. (e) Verification of haploid plant by flow cytometry analysis. The x‐axis indicates the signal peak for nuclei and y‐axis indicates the number of nuclei. (f) Haploid induction efficiency (HIR%) determined by self‐pollination or crossing. For crossing, a male sterile line 682A was used as the female and was pollinated with the #14 line. (g) Haploid plant with reduced height and smaller organs relative to WT. A representative haploid plant from crossing, morphologically similar to the female parent, is shown in the lower right panel. Our result demonstrates that haploid induction can be achieved in foxtail millet simply by knocking out SiMTL. Since different inducer lines have variable HIR learnt from maize, we expect that HIR can be improved by creating simtl lines with different genetic backgrounds or in combination with mutating other genes using the CRISPR‐Cas9 approach in foxtail millet (Jacquier et al., 2020). Since thousands of hybrid seeds can be easily produced with the improved crossing method (Jiang et al., 2013), it is anticipated that dozens to hundreds of haploid embryos could be obtained at the current HIR for research use. Sorting of tiny seeds with haploid embryos can be facilitated by introducing a fluorescent marker to the inducer, as demonstrated in other plants. In addition, haploid induction‐mediated gene editing has been reported in maize (Kelliher et al., 2019). It is promising that the foxtail millet inducers carrying CRISPR‐Cas9 can be used for such a gene editing strategy. Nevertheless, our successful haploid embryo induction should boost foxtail millet as a C4 model and sheds light on the way to utilize DH in breeding programmes upon further improvement of HIR.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Y.S., C.W., X.D., Y.G. and X.L. designed the experiments; Y.S., Z.C. and Y.S. performed the experiments; S.Y. conducted flow cytometry analysis; H.Z. made crosses; HS.Z., T.Y. and X.M. provided technical support; Y.S. and C.W. wrote the manuscript.
  11 in total

1.  Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize.

Authors:  Laurine M Gilles; Abdelsabour Khaled; Jean-Baptiste Laffaire; Sandrine Chaignon; Ghislaine Gendrot; Jérôme Laplaige; Hélène Bergès; Genséric Beydon; Vincent Bayle; Pierre Barret; Jordi Comadran; Jean-Pierre Martinant; Peter M Rogowsky; Thomas Widiez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A 4-bp Insertion at ZmPLA1 Encoding a Putative Phospholipase A Generates Haploid Induction in Maize.

Authors:  Chenxu Liu; Xiang Li; Dexuan Meng; Yu Zhong; Chen Chen; Xin Dong; Xiaowei Xu; Baojian Chen; Wei Li; Liang Li; Xiaolong Tian; Haiming Zhao; Weibin Song; Haishan Luo; Qinghua Zhang; Jinsheng Lai; Weiwei Jin; Jianbing Yan; Shaojiang Chen
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 13.164

3.  One-step genome editing of elite crop germplasm during haploid induction.

Authors:  Timothy Kelliher; Dakota Starr; Xiujuan Su; Guozhu Tang; Zhongying Chen; Jared Carter; Peter E Wittich; Shujie Dong; Julie Green; Erin Burch; Jamie McCuiston; Weining Gu; Yuejin Sun; Tim Strebe; James Roberts; Nic J Bate; Qiudeng Que
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Puzzling out plant reproduction by haploid induction for innovations in plant breeding.

Authors:  Nathanaël M A Jacquier; Laurine M Gilles; Douglas E Pyott; Jean-Pierre Martinant; Peter M Rogowsky; Thomas Widiez
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  A haplotype map of genomic variations and genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Authors:  Guanqing Jia; Xuehui Huang; Hui Zhi; Yan Zhao; Qiang Zhao; Wenjun Li; Yang Chai; Lifang Yang; Kunyan Liu; Hengyun Lu; Chuanrang Zhu; Yiqi Lu; Congcong Zhou; Danlin Fan; Qijun Weng; Yunli Guo; Tao Huang; Lei Zhang; Tingting Lu; Qi Feng; Hangfei Hao; Hongkuan Liu; Ping Lu; Ning Zhang; Yuhui Li; Erhu Guo; Shujun Wang; Suying Wang; Jinrong Liu; Wenfei Zhang; Guoqiu Chen; Baojin Zhang; Wei Li; Yongfang Wang; Haiquan Li; Baohua Zhao; Jiayang Li; Xianmin Diao; Bin Han
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction.

Authors:  Timothy Kelliher; Dakota Starr; Lee Richbourg; Satya Chintamanani; Brent Delzer; Michael L Nuccio; Julie Green; Zhongying Chen; Jamie McCuiston; Wenling Wang; Tara Liebler; Paul Bullock; Barry Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Jeremy Schmutz; Hao Wang; Ryan Percifield; Jennifer Hawkins; Ana C Pontaroli; Matt Estep; Liang Feng; Justin N Vaughn; Jane Grimwood; Jerry Jenkins; Kerrie Barry; Erika Lindquist; Uffe Hellsten; Shweta Deshpande; Xuewen Wang; Xiaomei Wu; Therese Mitros; Jimmy Triplett; Xiaohan Yang; Chu-Yu Ye; Margarita Mauro-Herrera; Lin Wang; Pinghua Li; Manoj Sharma; Rita Sharma; Pamela C Ronald; Olivier Panaud; Elizabeth A Kellogg; Thomas P Brutnell; Andrew N Doust; Gerald A Tuskan; Daniel Rokhsar; Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Authors:  Zixiang Cheng; Yao Sun; Suhua Yang; Hui Zhi; Tao Yin; Xiaojiao Ma; Haoshan Zhang; Xianmin Diao; Yan Guo; Xinhai Li; Chuanyin Wu; Yi Sui
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.803

9.  Methods for performing crosses in Setaria viridis, a new model system for the grasses.

Authors:  Hui Jiang; Hugues Barbier; Thomas Brutnell
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Extension of the in vivo haploid induction system from diploid maize to hexaploid wheat.

Authors:  Chenxu Liu; Yu Zhong; Xiaolong Qi; Ming Chen; Zongkai Liu; Chen Chen; Xiaolong Tian; Jinlong Li; Yanyan Jiao; Dong Wang; Yuwen Wang; Mengran Li; Mingming Xin; Wenxin Liu; Weiwei Jin; Shaojiang Chen
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  6 in total

1.  Advances in gene editing without residual transgenes in plants.

Authors:  Yubing He; Michael Mudgett; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Haploid induction in allotetraploid tobacco using DMPs mutation.

Authors:  Xiaolian Zhang; Lili Zhang; Jishun Zhang; Mengao Jia; Linggai Cao; Jing Yu; Degang Zhao
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Authors:  Zixiang Cheng; Yao Sun; Suhua Yang; Hui Zhi; Tao Yin; Xiaojiao Ma; Haoshan Zhang; Xianmin Diao; Yan Guo; Xinhai Li; Chuanyin Wu; Yi Sui
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.803

4.  Efficient Genome Editing in Setaria italica Using CRISPR/Cas9 and Base Editors.

Authors:  Zhen Liang; Yuqing Wu; Lingling Ma; Yingjie Guo; Yidong Ran
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanotechnology Pertinence in Agricultural Crop Refinement.

Authors:  Banavath Jayanna Naik; Ganesh Shimoga; Seong-Cheol Kim; Mekapogu Manjulatha; Chinreddy Subramanyam Reddy; Ramasubba Reddy Palem; Manu Kumar; Sang-Youn Kim; Soo-Hong Lee
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  Multi-omics intervention in Setaria to dissect climate-resilient traits: Progress and prospects.

Authors:  Pooja Rani Aggarwal; Lydia Pramitha; Pooja Choudhary; Roshan Kumar Singh; Pooja Shukla; Manoj Prasad; Mehanathan Muthamilarasan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.