Literature DB >> 33748742

Uncertainty in collocated mobile measurements of air quality.

Andrew R Whitehill1, Melissa Lunden2, Surender Kaushik1, Paul Solomon3.   

Abstract

Mobile mapping of air pollution has the potential to provide pollutant concentration data at unprecedented spatial scales. Characterizing instrument performance in the mobile context is challenging, but necessary to analyze and interpret the resulting data. We used robust statistical methods to assess mobile platform performance using data collected with the Aclima Inc. mobile air pollution measurement and data acquisition platform installed on three Google Street View cars. They were driven throughout the greater Denver metropolitan area between July 25, 2014 and August 14, 2014, measuring ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO), black carbon (BC), and size-resolve particle number counts (PN) between 0.3 μm and 5.0 μm diameter. August 6, 2014 was dedicated to parked and moving collocations among the three cars, allowing an assessment of measurement precision and bias. We used the median absolute deviation (MAD) to estimate instrument precision from outdoor, parked collocations. Bias was assessed by measurements obtained from parked cars using the standard deviation of median values over a collocated measurement period, as well as by Passing-Bablok regression statistics while the cars were moving and collocated. For the moving collocation periods, we compared the distribution of 1-σ standard deviations among the 3 cars to the estimated distribution assuming only measurement uncertainty (precision and bias). The distribution of mobile measurements agreed well with the theoretical uncertainty distribution at the lower end of the distribution for O3, NO2, and PN. We assert that the difference between the actual and theoretical distributions is due to real spatial variability between pollutants. The agreement between the parked car estimates of uncertainty and that measured during the mobile collocations (at the lower quantiles) provides evidence that on-road collocation while parked could be sufficient for estimating measurement uncertainties of a mobile platform, even when extended to the moving environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black carbon Ozone; Coefficient of variation; Median absolute deviation; Mobile monitoring; Nitric oxide; Nitrogen dioxide; Particulate matter

Year:  2020        PMID: 33748742      PMCID: PMC7970519          DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ X        ISSN: 2590-1621


  8 in total

1.  Emission factors for high-emitting vehicles based on on-road measurements of individual vehicle exhaust with a mobile measurement platform.

Authors:  Seong Suk Park; Kathleen Kozawa; Scott Fruin; Steve Mara; Ying-Kuang Hsu; Chris Jakober; Arthur Winer; Jorn Herner
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Field investigation of roadside vegetative and structural barrier impact on near-road ultrafine particle concentrations under a variety of wind conditions.

Authors:  Gayle S W Hagler; Ming-Yeng Lin; Andrey Khlystov; Richard W Baldauf; Vlad Isakov; James Faircloth; Laura E Jackson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Observation of Elevated Air Pollutant Concentrations in a Residential Neighborhood of Los Angeles California Using a Mobile Platform.

Authors:  Shishan Hu; Suzanne E Paulson; Scott Fruin; Kathleen Kozawa; Steve Mara; Arthur M Winer
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Mapping Air Pollution with Google Street View Cars: Efficient Approaches with Mobile Monitoring and Land Use Regression.

Authors:  Kyle P Messier; Sarah E Chambliss; Shahzad Gani; Ramon Alvarez; Michael Brauer; Jonathan J Choi; Steven P Hamburg; Jules Kerckhoffs; Brian LaFranchi; Melissa M Lunden; Julian D Marshall; Christopher J Portier; Ananya Roy; Adam A Szpiro; Roel C H Vermeulen; Joshua S Apte
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Methodology for setup and data processing of mobile air quality measurements to assess the spatial variability of concentrations in urban environments.

Authors:  Martine Van Poppel; Jan Peters; Nico Bleux
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I.

Authors:  H Passing
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1983-11

7.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data.

Authors:  Joshua S Apte; Kyle P Messier; Shahzad Gani; Michael Brauer; Thomas W Kirchstetter; Melissa M Lunden; Julian D Marshall; Christopher J Portier; Roel C H Vermeulen; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Mobile monitoring of air pollution in cities: the case of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Julie Wallace; Denis Corr; Patrick Deluca; Pavlos Kanaroglou; Brian McCarry
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-03-17
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Optimizing Urban Air Pollution Detection Systems.

Authors:  Vladimir Shakhov; Andrei Materukhin; Olga Sokolova; Insoo Koo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Effects of COVID-19 on the environment: An overview on air, water, wastewater, and solid waste.

Authors:  Khaled Elsaid; Valentina Olabi; Enas Taha Sayed; Tabbi Wilberforce; Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 8.910

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.