Anne J Keurentjes1, Sanja Kezic1, Thomas Rustemeyer2, Carel T J Hulshof1, Henk F van der Molen1. 1. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2. Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence is increasing, and occupational solar exposure contributes greatly to the overall lifetime ultraviolet radiation (UVR) dose. This is reflected in an excess risk of NMSC showing up to three-fold increase in outdoor workers. Risk of NMSC can be reduced if appropriate measures to reduce UVR-exposure are taken. Regular use of sunscreens showed reduced risk of NMSC. However, sun-safety behavior in outdoor workers is poor. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of an intervention aiming at increasing sunscreen use by construction workers. Methods: This non-randomized controlled intervention study is comprised of two intervention and two control groups recruited at four different construction sites in the Netherlands. The study population comprises ~200 construction workers, aged 18 years or older, followed during 12 weeks. The intervention consists of providing dispensers with sunscreens (SPF 50+) at construction sites and regular feedback on the application achieved by continuous electronic monitoring. All groups will receive basic information on UV-exposure and skin protection. Stratum corneum (SC) samples will be collected for measurement of biomarkers to assess internal UV-dose. External UV-dose will be assessed by personal UV-sensors worn by the workers during work-shifts in both groups. To detect presence of actinic keratosis (AK) or NMSC, a skin check of body parts exposed to the sun will be performed at the end of the study. The effect of the intervention will be assessed from data on self-reported sunscreen use by means of questionnaires collected on baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention (primary outcome). Levels of SC biomarkers of internal UV-dose, external UV-dose, number of sunburn episodes, and prevalence of NMSC including AK will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The electronically monitored sunscreen consumption will be assessed as process outcome. Discussion: This study is intended to provide evidence of the effectiveness of a technology-driven intervention to increase sunscreen use in outdoor construction workers. Furthermore, it will increase insight in the UV-protective behavior, external and internal UV-exposure, and the prevalence of NMSC, including AK, in construction workers. Trial Registration: The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NL8462 Registered on March 19, 2020.
RCT Entities:
Introduction: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence is increasing, and occupational solar exposure contributes greatly to the overall lifetime ultraviolet radiation (UVR) dose. This is reflected in an excess risk of NMSC showing up to three-fold increase in outdoor workers. Risk of NMSC can be reduced if appropriate measures to reduce UVR-exposure are taken. Regular use of sunscreens showed reduced risk of NMSC. However, sun-safety behavior in outdoor workers is poor. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of an intervention aiming at increasing sunscreen use by construction workers. Methods: This non-randomized controlled intervention study is comprised of two intervention and two control groups recruited at four different construction sites in the Netherlands. The study population comprises ~200 construction workers, aged 18 years or older, followed during 12 weeks. The intervention consists of providing dispensers with sunscreens (SPF 50+) at construction sites and regular feedback on the application achieved by continuous electronic monitoring. All groups will receive basic information on UV-exposure and skin protection. Stratum corneum (SC) samples will be collected for measurement of biomarkers to assess internal UV-dose. External UV-dose will be assessed by personal UV-sensors worn by the workers during work-shifts in both groups. To detect presence of actinic keratosis (AK) or NMSC, a skin check of body parts exposed to the sun will be performed at the end of the study. The effect of the intervention will be assessed from data on self-reported sunscreen use by means of questionnaires collected on baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention (primary outcome). Levels of SC biomarkers of internal UV-dose, external UV-dose, number of sunburn episodes, and prevalence of NMSC including AK will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The electronically monitored sunscreen consumption will be assessed as process outcome. Discussion: This study is intended to provide evidence of the effectiveness of a technology-driven intervention to increase sunscreen use in outdoor construction workers. Furthermore, it will increase insight in the UV-protective behavior, external and internal UV-exposure, and the prevalence of NMSC, including AK, in construction workers. Trial Registration: The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NL8462 Registered on March 19, 2020.
Authors: Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-06-13
Authors: Joni A Mayer; Donald J Slymen; Elizabeth J Clapp; Latrice C Pichon; Laura Eckhardt; Lawrence F Eichenfield; John P Elder; James F Sallis; Martin A Weinstock; April Achter; Cynthia Balderrama; Gabriel R Galindo; Sam S Oh Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M Lodén; H Beitner; H Gonzalez; D W Edström; U Akerström; J Austad; I Buraczewska-Norin; M Matsson; H C Wulf Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: V Mahler; K Aalto-Korte; J H Alfonso; J G Bakker; A Bauer; L Bensefa-Colas; A Boman; J Bourke; M Bubaš; P Bulat; J Chaloupka; L Constandt; T E Danielsen; R Darlenski; A Dugonik; K Ettler; A Gimenez-Arnau; M Gonçalo; J D Johansen; S M John; M Kiec-Swierczynska; P Koch; V Kohánka; B Krecisz; F Larese Filon; S Ljubojević; J Macan; B Marinović; M Matura; P W Mihatsch; D Mijakoski; J Minov; J Pace; M Pesonen; J M Ramada Rodilla; H Rast; V Reljic; C Salavastru; C Schuster; M L Schuttelaar; D Simon; R Spiewak; R Jurakic Tončić; S Urbanček; S Valiukevičienė; P Weinert; M Wilkinson; W Uter Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: S M John; M Trakatelli; R Gehring; K Finlay; C Fionda; M Wittlich; M Augustin; G Hilpert; J M Barroso Dias; C Ulrich; G Pellacani Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Henk F van der Molen; Prativa Basnet; Peter Lt Hoonakker; Marika M Lehtola; Jorma Lappalainen; Monique Hw Frings-Dresen; Roger Haslam; Jos H Verbeek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-02-05