Literature DB >> 19858077

What influences the uptake of information to prevent skin cancer? A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Ruth Garside1, Mark Pearson, Tiffany Moxham.   

Abstract

Skin cancer is an increasing problem in Europe, America and Australasia, although largely preventable by avoiding excessive ultraviolet (UV) exposure. This paper presents the findings of a systematic review of qualitative research about the prevention of skin cancer attributable to UV exposure. The aim is to understand elements that may contribute to the successful or unsuccessful conveyance of skin cancer prevention messages and their uptake by the public. A systematic review was undertaken using evidence identified through searching electronic bibliographic databases and Web sites and reference list checks. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Sixteen study reports (relating to 15 separate studies) were included from the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Each included study was quality appraised, and the findings were extracted into an evidence table. A coding scheme, framed by the Health Belief Model, was developed by the reviewers and informed analysis and synthesis. This showed that most people perceived their susceptibility to skin cancer, and its severity, as low. While benefits of adopting changed behaviour were acknowledged, there were substantial barriers to this, including positive perceptions of a tan as healthy and attractive and the hassle of covering up or using sunscreen. Peers, parents and media may offer 'cues to action' that encourage adoption of preventative behaviour and finally self-efficacy or the perceived ability to make such changes. Effective health education messages will need to address the barriers to adopting protective behaviours identified through this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19858077     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyp060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  15 in total

1.  Quitting the "Cancer Tube": a qualitative examination of the process of indoor tanning cessation.

Authors:  Smita C Banerjee; Jennifer L Hay; Alan C Geller; Joshua J Gagne; A Lindsay Frazier
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  [Primary prevention in the context of skin cancer screening].

Authors:  M Krensel; I Schäfer; N Zander; M Augustin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Protection Against Solar Ultraviolet Radiation in Outdoor Construction Workers: Study Protocol for a Non-randomized Controlled Intervention Study.

Authors:  Anne J Keurentjes; Sanja Kezic; Thomas Rustemeyer; Carel T J Hulshof; Henk F van der Molen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 4.  Factors influencing the implementation of fall-prevention programmes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Sue Child; Victoria Goodwin; Ruth Garside; Tracey Jones-Hughes; Kate Boddy; Ken Stein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Sunproofed study protocol: A mixed-methods scoping study of sun safety policies in primary schools in Wales.

Authors:  Julie Peconi; Claire O'Neill; Greg Fegan; Kirsty Lanyon; Timothy Driscoll; Ashley Akbari; Alan Watkins; Rachel Abbott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sun Protection Behaviors Associated with Self-Efficacy, Susceptibility, and Awareness among Uninsured Primary Care Patients Utilizing a Free Clinic.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Maziar M Nourian; Jeanie Ashby; Ha Ngoc Trinh; Jennifer Tabler; Nushean Assasnik; Bethany K H Lewis
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-06

7.  Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of sun protection interventions for operating engineers.

Authors:  Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Andrea H Waltje; Seung Hee Choi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Primary care review of actinic keratosis and its therapeutic options: a global perspective.

Authors:  Praven Chetty; Felix Choi; Timothy Mitchell
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 9.  What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Baxter; Natalie Taylor; Ian Kellar; Rebecca Lawton
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.

Authors:  Andrew Booth; Christopher Carroll
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.