Literature DB >> 33747682

Synthetic CT Generation of the Pelvis in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Single Input Approach Using Generative Adversarial Network.

Atallah Baydoun1, K E Xu2,3, Jin Uk Heo4,5, Huan Yang2,3, Feifei Zhou5, Latoya A Bethell5, Elisha T Fredman6, Rodney J Ellis7, Tarun K Podder1,6, Melanie S Traughber8, Raj M Paspulati5,9, Pengjiang Qian2,3, Bryan J Traughber7, Raymond F Muzic5,9.   

Abstract

Multi-modality imaging constitutes a foundation of precision medicine, especially in oncology where reliable and rapid imaging techniques are needed in order to insure adequate diagnosis and treatment. In cervical cancer, precision oncology requires the acquisition of 18F-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance (MR), and computed tomography (CT) images. Thereafter, images are co-registered to derive electron density attributes required for FDG-PET attenuation correction and radiation therapy planning. Nevertheless, this traditional approach is subject to MR-CT registration defects, expands treatment expenses, and increases the patient's radiation exposure. To overcome these disadvantages, we propose a new framework for cross-modality image synthesis which we apply on MR-CT image translation for cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment. The framework is based on a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) and illustrates a novel tactic that addresses, simplistically but efficiently, the paradigm of vanishing gradient vs. feature extraction in deep learning. Its contributions are summarized as follows: 1) The approach -termed sU-cGAN-uses, for the first time, a shallow U-Net (sU-Net) with an encoder/decoder depth of 2 as generator; 2) sU-cGAN's input is the same MR sequence that is used for radiological diagnosis, i.e. T2-weighted, Turbo Spin Echo Single Shot (TSE-SSH) MR images; 3) Despite limited training data and a single input channel approach, sU-cGAN outperforms other state of the art deep learning methods and enables accurate synthetic CT (sCT) generation. In conclusion, the suggested framework should be studied further in the clinical settings. Moreover, the sU-Net model is worth exploring in other computer vision tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; U-Net; computed tomography; deep learning; generative adversarial network; magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33747682      PMCID: PMC7978399          DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3049781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Access        ISSN: 2169-3536            Impact factor:   3.367


  31 in total

1.  A voxel-based investigation for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain using ultra short echo times.

Authors:  Jens M Edmund; Hans M Kjer; Koen Van Leemput; Rasmus H Hansen; Jon A L Andersen; Daniel Andreasen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging in the Age of Precision Medicine: Summary of the Proceedings of the 10th Biannual Symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology.

Authors:  Christian J Herold; Jonathan S Lewin; Andreas G Wibmer; James H Thrall; Gabriel P Krestin; Adrian K Dixon; Stefan O Schoenberg; Rena J Geckle; Ada Muellner; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Generating patient specific pseudo-CT of the head from MR using atlas-based regression.

Authors:  J Sjölund; D Forsberg; M Andersson; H Knutsson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  MRI distortion: considerations for MRI based radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Amy Walker; Gary Liney; Peter Metcalfe; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.430

5.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  W T Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Investigating conditional GAN performance with different generator architectures, an ensemble model, and different MR scanners for MR-sCT conversion.

Authors:  Lukas Fetty; Tommy Löfstedt; Gerd Heilemann; Hugo Furtado; Nicole Nesvacil; Tufve Nyholm; Dietmar Georg; Peter Kuess
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  MR-based PET attenuation correction using a combined ultrashort echo time/multi-echo Dixon acquisition.

Authors:  Paul Kyu Han; Debra E Horng; Kuang Gong; Yoann Petibon; Kyungsang Kim; Quanzheng Li; Keith A Johnson; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang; Chao Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  MRI-based treatment planning with pseudo CT generated through atlas registration.

Authors:  Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Chiaho Hua
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Evaluation of the tool "Reg Refine" for user-guided deformable image registration.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Kyle R Padgett; Kuan L Chen; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  A practical review of magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation and management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Emma C Fields; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  1 in total

1.  Abdominopelvic MR to CT registration using a synthetic CT intermediate.

Authors:  Jin Uk Heo; Feifei Zhou; Robert Jones; Jiamin Zheng; Xin Song; Pengjiang Qian; Atallah Baydoun; Melanie S Traughber; Jung-Wen Kuo; Rose Al Helo; Cheryl Thompson; Norbert Avril; Daniel DeVincent; Harold Hunt; Amit Gupta; Navid Faraji; Michael Z Kharouta; Arash Kardan; David Bitonte; Christian B Langmack; Aaron Nelson; Alexandria Kruzer; Min Yao; Jennifer Dorth; John Nakayama; Steven E Waggoner; Tithi Biswas; Eleanor Harris; Susan Sandstrom; Bryan J Traughber; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.243

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.