| Literature DB >> 33747327 |
Mahmut Ozdemir1, Ramazan Asoglu2, Zeki Dogan3, Nesim Aladag4, Tayyar Akbulut5, Mustafa Yurtdas3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of mortality and morbidity in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Aortic propagation velocity (APV), epicardial fat thickness (EFT) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements could provide additional information on assessing renal decline in CKD patients. The study aimed to evaluate EFT, AVP and CIMT in CKD patients and then investigate the association among those parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic propagation velocity; Carotid intima-media thickness; Chronic kidney disease; Epicardial fat thickness
Year: 2021 PMID: 33747327 PMCID: PMC7935629 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med Res ISSN: 1918-3003
Figure 1APV in a patient with stage V CKD (APV = 38.2 cm/s) (a) and in a patient with stage III (APV = 57.3 cm/s) (b). APV: aortic propagation velocity; CKD: chronic kidney disease.
Figure 2Measurement of EFT in a patient with stage V (a) and a patient with stage I (b). EFT is perpendicular to the right ventricular free wall (arrow). Ao: aort; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle; EFT: epicardial fat thickness.
The Demographic and Clinical Data of the Study Population
| Stage I (n = 76) | Stage II (n = 39) | Stage III (n = 25) | Stage IV (n = 15) | Stage V (n = 15) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.2 ± 12.6 | 63.4 ± 10.3a | 63.9 ± 8.6a | 59.8 ± 12.2 | 63.6 ± 4.6a | < 0.001 |
| Male, n (%) | 53 (70) | 27 (69) | 14 (56) | 8 (53) | 7 (47) | 0.293 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.3 ± 5.0 | 28.9 ± 3.3 | 29.0 ± 4.9 | 29.4 ± 4.5 | 30.1 ± 5.5 | 0.940 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 22 (29) | 10 (25) | 8 (32) | 6 (40) | 3 (20) | 0.145 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 32 (42) | 20 (51) | 19 (76)a, b | 4 (27)c | 13 (87)a, b, d | 0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 35 (46) | 34 (87)a | 18 (72) | 15 (100)a | 5 (33)b, d | < 0.001 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 37 (49) | 22 (57) | 12 (48) | 6 (40) | 13 (87) | 0.065 |
| Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 24 (32) | 15 (40) | 13 (52) | 12 (80)a | 3 (20)d | 0.003 |
| White blood cell count (103/mm3) | 8.1 ± 2.0 | 8.5 ± 2.5 | 8.8 ± 1.9 | 6.0 ± 1.4a, b, c | 7.5 ± 0.8 | < 0.001 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.9 ± 1.8 | 12.7 ± 1.8a | 12.7 ± 1.0a | 11.5 ± 1.8a | 10.2 ± 2.6a, b, c | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1a | 1.9 ± 0.6a, b | 3.8 ± 0.5a, b, c | 5.9 ± 0.4a, b, c, d | < 0.001 |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 137.4 ± 3.7 | 135.8 ± 3.1 | 136.8 ± 0.9 | 141.5 ± 5.0a, b, c | 134.2 ± 3.6a, d | < 0.001 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.3a, b | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 0.036 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 10.6 ± 8.0 | 15.7 ± 12.2a | 10.9 ± 7.1 | 7.1 ± 9.8b | 15.1 ± 6.0 | 0.007 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 205.0 ± 43.2 | 217.2 ± 40.3 | 216.4 ± 46.7 | 213.2 ± 55.8 | 202.9 ± 24.2 | 0.534 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 58.2 ± 6.6 | 57.2 ± 12.1 | 57.5 ± 17.9 | 60.6 ± 11.0 | 56.5 ± 3.6 | 0.645 |
| Aortic propagation velocity (cm/s) | 59.4 ± 19.5 | 51.5 ± 13.8 | 37.4 ± 5.8a, b | 26.8 ± 4.0a, b | 29.9 ± 6.8a, b | < 0.001 |
| Epicardial fat thickness (mm) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1a | 1.2 ± 0.2a, b, c | 0.9 ± 0.2a, d | < 0.001 |
| Carotid intima-media thickness (mm) | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3a | 0.9 ± 0.2a | 1.1 ± 0.2a, b | 1.1 ± 0.1a, b | < 0.001 |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min) | 95.7 ± 7.8 | 72.0 ± 11.4a | 48.4 ± 6.6a, b | 28.2 ± 3.0a, b, c | 12.9 ± 4.0a, b, c, d | < 0.001 |
Stage I vs. other groups. bStage II vs. other groups. cStage III vs. other groups. dStage IV vs. other groups. BMI: body mass index.
Figure 3Aortic propagation velocity (a), epicardial fat thickness (b) and carotid intima-media thickness (c) values in chronic kidney disease stages.
Correlation Analysis Among eGFR, APV, EFT and CIMT
| eGFR | APV | EFT | CIMT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
| eGFR | - | - | 0.587 | < 0.001 | -0.453 | < 0.001 | -0.640 | < 0.001 |
| APV | 0.587 | < 0.001 | - | - | -0.401 | < 0.001 | -0.628 | < 0.001 |
| EFT | -0.453 | < 0.001 | -0.401 | < 0.001 | - | - | 0.522 | < 0.001 |
| CIMT | -0.640 | < 0.001 | -0.628 | < 0.001 | 0.522 | < 0.001 | - | - |
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; APV: aortic propagation velocity; EFT: epicardial fat thickness; CIMT: carotid intima-media thickness.
Figure 4Correlation analysis between estimated glomerular filtration rate and aortic propagation velocity (r = 0.587, P < 0.001).
Figure 5Correlation analysis between estimated glomerular filtration rate and epicardial fat thickness (r = -0.453, P < 0.001).
Figure 6Correlation analysis between estimated glomerular filtration rate and carotid intima-media thickness (r = -0.640, P < 0.001).
Independent Predictors for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate by Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis
| Standardized coefficients beta | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | -0.032 | -0.561 | 0.576 |
| APV | 0.291 | 3.969 | < 0.001 |
| EFT | -0.131 | -1.967 | 0.048 |
| CIMT | -0.380 | -4.694 | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | -0.043 | -0.757 | 0.450 |
| Hypertension | -0.019 | -0.322 | 0.748 |
BMI: body mass index; APV: aortic propagation velocity; EFT: epicardial fat thickness; CIMT: carotid intima-media thickness.