Literature DB >> 33747079

A Risk Signature with Nine Stemness Index-Associated Genes for Predicting Survival of Patients with Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma.

Haoya Xu1,2, Ruoyao Zou1,2, Jiyu Liu1,2, Liancheng Zhu1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify mRNA expression-based stemness index- (mRNAsi-) related genes and build an mRNAsi-related risk signature for endometrial cancer.
METHODS: We collected mRNAsi data of endometrial cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and analyzed their relationship with the main clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. We screened the top 50% of the genes in TCGA for weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to explore mRNAsi-related gene sets. Among these mRNAsi-related genes, we further screened for those related to the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients via univariate Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Using stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis, a stemness index-related risk signature was constructed. Finally, we identified potential prognostic biomarkers for endometrial cancer by combining the GEO database and immunohistochemical staining.
RESULTS: The mRNAsi of endometrial cancer samples was significantly higher than that of normal samples and was related to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathological grade, postoperative tumor status, and overall survival of endometrial cancer patients. We identified 21 mRNAsi-related gene modules, and 1,324 genes were obtained from the most relevant module. TCGA samples were divided into training and validation cohorts, and the training cohort was used to construct a nine-mRNAsi-related gene signature (B3GAT2, CD3EAP, DMC1, FRMPD3, LINC01224, LINC02068, LY6H, NR6A1, and TLE2). High-risk and low-risk patients had significant prognostic differences, and the risk signature could accurately predict their 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. The nomogram composed of risk score and multiple clinicopathological features could accurately predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. Finally, CD3EAP was found to be a novel prognostic biomarker for endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSION: Endometrial cancer cell stemness is related to patient prognosis. The nine-gene risk signature is an independent prognostic factor and can accurately predict endometrial cancer patient prognosis.
Copyright © 2021 Haoya Xu et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33747079      PMCID: PMC7960070          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6653247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol        ISSN: 1687-8450            Impact factor:   4.375


  31 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Genome-scale analysis of aberrant DNA methylation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshinori Hinoue; Daniel J Weisenberger; Christopher P E Lange; Hui Shen; Hyang-Min Byun; David Van Den Berg; Simeen Malik; Fei Pan; Houtan Noushmehr; Cornelis M van Dijk; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Peter W Laird
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

4.  Expression screening of cancer/testis genes in prostate cancer identifies NR6A1 as a novel marker of disease progression and aggressiveness.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Bertrand Evrard; Gaëlle Fromont; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Julie Godet; Xavier Cathelineau; François Guillé; Michael Primig; Frédéric Chalmel
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Prognostic Value of a Stemness Index-Associated Signature in Primary Lower-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Mingwei Zhang; Xuezhen Wang; Xiaoping Chen; Feibao Guo; Jinsheng Hong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Genome-Wide Plasma Cell-Free DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Potential Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jun Lu; Qiang Zhao; Jun Wu; Jielin Sun; Baohui Han; Xiaodong Zhao; Yani Kang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a unique subgroup with distinct clinicopathological and molecular features.

Authors:  Yakun Wang; Li Sun; Zhongwu Li; Jing Gao; Sai Ge; Cheng Zhang; Jiajia Yuan; Xicheng Wang; Jian Li; Zhihao Lu; Jifang Gong; Ming Lu; Jun Zhou; Zhi Peng; Lin Shen; Xiaotian Zhang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Targeting cancer stem cell signature gene SMOC-2 Overcomes chemoresistance and inhibits cell proliferation of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Huan Lu; Dan-Dan Ju; Guang-Dong Yang; Lin-Yan Zhu; Xiao-Mei Yang; Jun Li; Wei-Wei Song; Jin-Hao Wang; Can-Can Zhang; Zhi-Gang Zhang; Rong Zhang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Silencing Long Non-coding RNA LINC01224 Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via MicroRNA-330-5p-Induced Inhibition of CHEK1.

Authors:  Dan Gong; Peng-Cheng Feng; Xing-Fei Ke; Hui-Lan Kuang; Li-Li Pan; Qiang Ye; Jian-Bing Wu
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.886

View more
  6 in total

1.  The interplay between lncRNAs, RNA-binding proteins and viral genome during SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals strong connections with regulatory events involved in RNA metabolism and immune response.

Authors:  Francisco J Enguita; Ana Lúcia Leitão; J Tyson McDonald; Viktorija Zaksas; Saswati Das; Diego Galeano; Deanne Taylor; Eve Syrkin Wurtele; Amanda Saravia-Butler; Stephen B Baylin; Robert Meller; D Marshall Porterfield; Douglas C Wallace; Jonathan C Schisler; Christopher E Mason; Afshin Beheshti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.600

2.  Diagnostic and prognostic factors, and two nomograms for endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis: A large cohort retrospective study.

Authors:  Fengkai Yang; Ruhan Zhao; Xiaohui Huang; Yucheng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Development of an Oxidative Phosphorylation-Related and Immune Microenvironment Prognostic Signature in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinhui Liu; Tian Chen; Min Yang; Zihang Zhong; Senmiao Ni; Sheng Yang; Fang Shao; Lixin Cai; Jianling Bai; Hao Yu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis of Serine Racemase as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Zhiwei Cui; Jiantao Mo; Lijun Wang; Rongli Wang; Feiyan Cheng; Lihui Wang; Xinyuan Yang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Integration of Transcriptome and Epigenome to Identify and Develop Prognostic Markers for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Can Xu; Wei Cao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.501

6.  Comprehensive landscape of the functions and prognostic value of RNA binding proteins in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Yao; Kangping Liu; Yuxuan Wu; Jieyu Zhou; Heyue Jin; Yimin Zhang; Yumin Zhu
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.