Federica Somma1, Paolo Bartolomeo2, Federica Vallone3,4, Antonietta Argiuolo1, Antonio Cerrato1, Orazio Miglino1,5, Laura Mandolesi4, Maria Clelia Zurlo3, Onofrio Gigliotta1. 1. Natural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory, Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 2. Sorbonne Université, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. 3. Dynamic Psychology Laboratory, Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 4. Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 5. Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The measures taken to contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, such as the lockdown in Italy, do impact psychological health; yet, less is known about their effect on cognitive functioning. The transactional theory of stress predicts reciprocal influences between perceived stress and cognitive performance. However, the effects of a period of stress due to social isolation on spatial cognition and exploration have been little examined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible effects and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spatial cognition tasks, particularly those concerning spatial exploration, and the physiological leftward bias known as pseudoneglect. A right-hemisphere asymmetry for spatial attention processes crucially contributes to pseudoneglect. Other evidence indicates a predominantly right-hemisphere activity in stressful situations. We also analyzed the effects of lockdown on coping strategies, which typically show an opposite pattern of hemispheric asymmetry, favoring the left hemisphere. If so, then pseudoneglect should increase during the lockdown and be negatively correlated with the efficacy of coping strategies. METHODS: One week before the start of the lockdown due to COVID-19 in Italy (T1), we had collected data from a battery of behavioral tests including tasks of peri-personal spatial cognition. During the quarantine period, from late April to early May 2020 (T2), we repeated the testing sessions with a subgroup of the same participants (47 right-handed students, mean age = 20, SD = 1.33). At both testing sessions, participants performed digitized neuropsychological tests, including a Cancellation task, Radial Arm Maze task, and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Participants also completed a newly developed COVID-19 Student Stress Scale, based on transactional models of stress, and the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-New Italian Version (COPE-NIV) to assess coping orientation. RESULTS: The tendency to start cancelation from a left-sided item, to explore first a left-sided arm of the maze, and to choose erroneous response items on the left side of the page on Raven's matrices increased from T1 to T2. The degree of pseudoneglect increment positively correlated with perceived stress and negatively correlated with Positive Attitude and Problem-Solving COPE-NIV subscales. CONCLUSION: Lockdown-related stress may have contributed to increase leftward bias during quarantine through a greater activation of the right hemisphere. On the other hand, pseudoneglect was decreased for better coping participants, perhaps as a consequence of a more balanced hemispheric activity in these individuals.
BACKGROUND: The measures taken to contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, such as the lockdown in Italy, do impact psychological health; yet, less is known about their effect on cognitive functioning. The transactional theory of stress predicts reciprocal influences between perceived stress and cognitive performance. However, the effects of a period of stress due to social isolation on spatial cognition and exploration have been little examined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible effects and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spatial cognition tasks, particularly those concerning spatial exploration, and the physiological leftward bias known as pseudoneglect. A right-hemisphere asymmetry for spatial attention processes crucially contributes to pseudoneglect. Other evidence indicates a predominantly right-hemisphere activity in stressful situations. We also analyzed the effects of lockdown on coping strategies, which typically show an opposite pattern of hemispheric asymmetry, favoring the left hemisphere. If so, then pseudoneglect should increase during the lockdown and be negatively correlated with the efficacy of coping strategies. METHODS: One week before the start of the lockdown due to COVID-19 in Italy (T1), we had collected data from a battery of behavioral tests including tasks of peri-personal spatial cognition. During the quarantine period, from late April to early May 2020 (T2), we repeated the testing sessions with a subgroup of the same participants (47 right-handed students, mean age = 20, SD = 1.33). At both testing sessions, participants performed digitized neuropsychological tests, including a Cancellation task, Radial Arm Maze task, and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Participants also completed a newly developed COVID-19 Student Stress Scale, based on transactional models of stress, and the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-New Italian Version (COPE-NIV) to assess coping orientation. RESULTS: The tendency to start cancelation from a left-sided item, to explore first a left-sided arm of the maze, and to choose erroneous response items on the left side of the page on Raven's matrices increased from T1 to T2. The degree of pseudoneglect increment positively correlated with perceived stress and negatively correlated with Positive Attitude and Problem-Solving COPE-NIV subscales. CONCLUSION: Lockdown-related stress may have contributed to increase leftward bias during quarantine through a greater activation of the right hemisphere. On the other hand, pseudoneglect was decreased for better coping participants, perhaps as a consequence of a more balanced hemispheric activity in these individuals.
Authors: Lars Schwabe; Melly S Oitzl; Christine Philippsen; Steffen Richter; Andreas Bohringer; Werner Wippich; Hartmut Schachinger Journal: Learn Mem Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Christian Brem; Jürgen Lutz; Christian Vollmar; Matthias Feuerecker; Claudia Strewe; Igor Nichiporuk; Galina Vassilieva; Gustav Schelling; Alexander Choukér Journal: Life Sci Space Res (Amst) Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Pierpaolo Sorrentino; Anna Lardone; Matteo Pesoli; Marianna Liparoti; Simone Montuori; Giuseppe Curcio; Giuseppe Sorrentino; Laura Mandolesi; Francesca Foti Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-03-29
Authors: José Miguel Soares; Adriana Sampaio; Luís Miguel Ferreira; Nadine Correia Santos; Paulo Marques; Fernanda Marques; Joana Almeida Palha; João José Cerqueira; Nuno Sousa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna Lardone; Patrizia Turriziani; Pierpaolo Sorrentino; Onofrio Gigliotta; Andrea Chirico; Fabio Lucidi; Laura Mandolesi Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Maria Clelia Zurlo; Federica Vallone; Maria Francesca Cattaneo Della Volta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 4.614