Athanassios Argiris1, Jieling Miao2, Mihaela C Cristea3, Allen M Chen4, Jacob M Sands5, Roy H Decker6, Scott N Gettinger6, Megan E Daly7, Bryan A Faller8, Kathy S Albain9, Ronald H Yanagihara10, Linda L Garland11, Lauren A Byers12, Ding Wang13, Marianna Koczywas3, Mary W Redman2, Karen Kelly7, David R Gandara7. 1. Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX. Electronic address: athanassios.argiris@gmail.com. 2. SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 3. City of Hope, Duarte, CA. 4. University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS [previous]/University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA. 5. Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA [previous]/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 6. Yale University, New Haven, CT. 7. University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA. 8. Heartland NCORP/Missouri Baptist Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO. 9. Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL. 10. Hawaii MU-NCORP/Straub Clinic & Hospital, Honolulu, HI. 11. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 12. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 13. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a 2-part study to evaluate the incorporation of veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, into chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase I part, patients were treated successively at 3 dose levels of veliparib (40, 80, and 120 mg) twice daily during CRT. In the phase II part, patients were randomized to receive veliparib or placebo during thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib or placebo. The study was prematurely discontinued owing to the emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as standard of care. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled in phase I, 2 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dysphagia (at 40 mg) and 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dehydration (at 80 mg). No DLTs were seen at veliparib dose of 120 mg twice daily, which was selected for the phase II part that enrolled 31 eligible patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the 2 arms (P = .20). For the veliparib and placebo arms, response rates were 56% and 69%, PFS at 1 year 47% and 46%, and overall survival at 1 year 89% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Veliparib with CRT was feasible and well tolerated. Efficacy could not accurately be determined because of early study closure. Nonetheless, there is enthusiasm for the evaluation of PARP inhibitors in lung cancer as predictive biomarkers are being developed and combinations with immunotherapy are attractive.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a 2-part study to evaluate the incorporation of veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, into chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase I part, patients were treated successively at 3 dose levels of veliparib (40, 80, and 120 mg) twice daily during CRT. In the phase II part, patients were randomized to receive veliparib or placebo during thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib or placebo. The study was prematurely discontinued owing to the emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as standard of care. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled in phase I, 2 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dysphagia (at 40 mg) and 1 grade 3 esophagitis with dehydration (at 80 mg). No DLTs were seen at veliparib dose of 120 mg twice daily, which was selected for the phase II part that enrolled 31 eligible patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the 2 arms (P = .20). For the veliparib and placebo arms, response rates were 56% and 69%, PFS at 1 year 47% and 46%, and overall survival at 1 year 89% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Veliparib with CRT was feasible and well tolerated. Efficacy could not accurately be determined because of early study closure. Nonetheless, there is enthusiasm for the evaluation of PARP inhibitors in lung cancer as predictive biomarkers are being developed and combinations with immunotherapy are attractive.
Authors: Rafael Santana-Davila; Kiran Devisetty; Aniko Szabo; Rodney Sparapani; Carlos Arce-Lara; Elizabeth M Gore; Amy Moran; Christina D Williams; Michael J Kelley; Jeffrey Whittle Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leonard J Appleman; Jan H Beumer; Yixing Jiang; Yan Lin; Fei Ding; Shannon Puhalla; Leigh Swartz; Taofeek K Owonikoko; R Donald Harvey; Ronald Stoller; Daniel P Petro; Hussein A Tawbi; Athanassios Argiris; Sandra Strychor; Marie Pouquet; Brian Kiesel; Alice P Chen; David Gandara; Chandra P Belani; Edward Chu; Suresh S Ramalingam Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Guojing Zhang; Xingming Deng; Michael R Rossi; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Gregory H Doho; Zhengjia Chen; Sungjin Kim; Sandy Strychor; Susan M Christner; Jan Beumer; Chunyang Li; Ping Yue; Alice Chen; Gabriel L Sica; Suresh S Ramalingam; Jeanne Kowalski; Fadlo R Khuri; Shi-Yong Sun Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: R de Haan; E van Werkhoven; M M van den Heuvel; H M U Peulen; G S Sonke; P Elkhuizen; M W M van den Brekel; M E T Tesselaar; C Vens; J H M Schellens; B van Triest; M Verheij Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.430