Literature DB >> 28339804

Intra-cardiac and peripheral levels of biochemical markers of fibrosis in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Gordon A Begg1,2, Rashed Karim3, Tobias Oesterlein4, Lee N Graham1, Andrew J Hogarth1, Stephen P Page1, Christopher B Pepper1, Kawal Rhode3, Gregory Y H Lip5,6, Arun V Holden7, Sven Plein2, Muzahir H Tayebjee1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Measurement of circulating biomarkers of fibrosis may have a role in selecting patients and treatment strategy for catheter ablation. Pro-collagen type III N-terminal pro-peptide (PIIINP), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and galectin 3 (gal-3) have all been suggested as possible biomarkers for this indication, but studies assessing whether peripheral levels reflect intra-cardiac levels are scarce. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 93 patients undergoing ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 63) or non-paroxysmal AF (n = 30). Femoral venous, left and right atrial, and coronary sinus blood were analysed using ELISA to determine biomarker levels. Levels were compared with control patients (n = 36) and baseline characteristics, including left atrial voltage mapping data. C-telopeptide of type I collagen levels were higher in AF than in non-AF patients (P = 0.007). Peripheral ICTP levels were higher than all intra-cardiac levels (P < 0.001). Peripheral gal-3 levels were higher than left atrial levels (P = 0.001). Peripheral levels of FGF-23 and PIIINP were not significantly different from intra-cardiac levels. CS levels of ICTP were higher than right and left atrial levels (P < 0.001). gal-3 was higher in women vs. men (P ≤ 0.001) and with higher body mass index (P ≤ 0.001). ICTP levels increased with reducing ejection fraction (P ≤ 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation patients have higher levels of circulating ICTP than matched non-AF controls. In AF ablation patients, intra-cardiac sampling of FGF-23 or PIIINP gives no further information over peripheral sampling. For gal-3 and ICTP, intra-cardiac sampling may be necessary to assess their association with intra-cardiac processes. None of the biomarkers is related to fibrosis assessed by left atrial voltage. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Biomarker; Fibrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28339804     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  11 in total

1.  Left atrial voltage, circulating biomarkers of fibrosis, and atrial fibrillation ablation. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gordon A Begg; Rashed Karim; Tobias Oesterlein; Lee N Graham; Andrew J Hogarth; Stephen P Page; Christopher B Pepper; Kawal Rhode; Gregory Y H Lip; Arun V Holden; Sven Plein; Muzahir H Tayebjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Increased serum lysyl oxidase-like 2 levels correlate with the degree of left atrial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yingming Zhao; Kangting Tang; Xu Tianbao; Junhong Wang; Jin Yang; Dianfu Li
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Galectin-3 and risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengqi Gong; Angel Cheung; Qun-Shan Wang; Guangping Li; Christos A Goudis; George Bazoukis; Gregory Y H Lip; Adrian Baranchuk; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Konstantinos P Letsas; Gary Tse; Tong Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Imaging, biomarker and invasive assessment of diffuse left ventricular myocardial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gordon A Begg; Peter P Swoboda; Rashed Karim; Tobias Oesterlein; Kawal Rhode; Arun V Holden; John P Greenwood; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Y H Lip; Sven Plein; Muzahir H Tayebjee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-determined left ventricular myocardium impairment is associated with C-reactive protein and ST2 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Songnan Li; Chen Zhang; Jie Tian; Aijia Lu; Rong Bai; Jing An; Andreas Greiser; Jie Huang; Xiaohai Ma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Therapeutic implications of galectin-3 in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kwang-No Lee; Do Young Kim; Ki Yung Boo; Yun Gi Kim; Seung-Young Roh; Yong-Soo Baek; Dong-Hyeok Kim; Dae In Lee; Jaemin Shim; Jong-Il Choi; Gyo-Seung Hwang; Young-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predictors of left atrial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for catheter ablation.

Authors:  Valentina A Rossi; Iva Krizanovic-Grgic; Jan Steffel; Daniel Hofer; Thomas Wolber; Corinna B Brunckhorst; Frank Ruschitzka; Firat Duru; Alexander Breitenstein; Ardan M Saguner
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Elevated β1-Adrenergic Receptor Autoantibody Levels Increase Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility by Promoting Atrial Fibrosis.

Authors:  Luxiang Shang; Ling Zhang; Mengjiao Shao; Min Feng; Jia Shi; Zhenyu Dong; Qilong Guo; Jiasuoer Xiaokereti; Ran Xiang; Huaxin Sun; Xianhui Zhou; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Atrial Fibrosis, Ischaemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Christian Mahnkopf; Younghoon Kwon; Nazem Akoum
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2021-12

10.  Hydrogen Sulfide Ameliorates Angiotensin II-Induced Atrial Fibrosis Progression to Atrial Fibrillation Through Inhibition of the Warburg Effect and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.

Authors:  Heng-Jing Hu; Xiu-Heng Wang; Yao Liu; Tian-Qing Zhang; Zheng-Rong Chen; Chi Zhang; Zhi-Han Tang; Shun-Lin Qu; Hui-Fang Tang; Zhi-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.