Literature DB >> 33744990

An A.I. classifier derived from 4D radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI data: potential to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies.

Nina Pötsch1, Matthias Dietzel2, Panagiotis Kapetas1, Paola Clauser1, Katja Pinker3, Stephan Ellmann2, Michael Uder2, Thomas Helbich1, Pascal A T Baltzer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Due to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (bMRI) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The high number of detected lesions poses a significant logistic challenge in clinical practice. The aim was to evaluate a temporally and spatially resolved (4D) radiomics approach to distinguish benign from malignant enhancing breast lesions and thereby avoid unnecessary biopsies.
METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with MRI-suspicious findings (BI-RADS 4/5). Two blinded readers analyzed DCE images using a commercially available software, automatically extracting BI-RADS curve types and pharmacokinetic enhancement features. After principal component analysis (PCA), a neural network-derived A.I. classifier to discriminate benign from malignant lesions was constructed and tested using a random split simple approach. The rate of avoidable biopsies was evaluated at exploratory cutoffs (C1, 100%, and C2, ≥ 95% sensitivity).
RESULTS: Four hundred seventy (295 malignant) lesions in 329 female patients (mean age 55.1 years, range 18-85 years) were examined. Eighty-six DCE features were extracted based on automated volumetric lesion analysis. Five independent component features were extracted using PCA. The A.I. classifier achieved a significant (p < .001) accuracy to distinguish benign from malignant lesion within the test sample (AUC: 83.5%; 95% CI: 76.8-89.0%). Applying identified cutoffs on testing data not included in training dataset showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions by 14.5% (C1) and 36.2% (C2).
CONCLUSION: The investigated automated 4D radiomics approach resulted in an accurate A.I. classifier able to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Its application could have avoided unnecessary biopsies. KEY POINTS: • Principal component analysis of the extracted volumetric and temporally resolved (4D) DCE markers favored pharmacokinetic modeling derived features. • An A.I. classifier based on 86 extracted DCE features achieved a good to excellent diagnostic performance as measured by the area under the ROC curve with 80.6% (training dataset) and 83.5% (testing dataset). • Testing the resulting A.I. classifier showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign breast lesions by up to 36.2%, p < .001 at the cost of up to 4.5% (n = 4) false negative low-risk cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; Breast biopsies; Breast cancer; Neural network; Principal component analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33744990     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07787-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.

Authors:  K Pinker; H Bickel; T H Helbich; S Gruber; P Dubsky; U Pluschnig; M Rudas; Z Bago-Horvath; M Weber; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Marije F Bakker; Stéphanie V de Lange; Ruud M Pijnappel; Ritse M Mann; Petra H M Peeters; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Marleen J Emaus; Claudette E Loo; Robertus H C Bisschops; Marc B I Lobbes; Matthijn D F de Jong; Katya M Duvivier; Jeroen Veltman; Nico Karssemeijer; Harry J de Koning; Paul J van Diest; Willem P T M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Wouter B Veldhuis; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score.

Authors:  Anja Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Clemens G Kaiser; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Carla Boetes; Bettina Borisch; Thomas Decker; Massimo Federico; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Werner A Kaiser; Michael J Kerin; Robert E Mansel; Lorenza Marotti; Laura Martincich; Louis Mauriac; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Roberto Orecchia; Pietro Panizza; Antonio Ponti; Arnie D Purushotham; Peter Regitnig; Marco Rosselli Del Turco; Fabienne Thibault; Robin Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.

Authors:  Erik Verburg; Carla H van Gils; Marije F Bakker; Max A Viergever; Ruud M Pijnappel; Wouter B Veldhuis; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Melanie Schernthaner; Katja Pinker; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Stephan H Polanec; Hubert Bickel; Georg J Wengert; Margaretha Rudas; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Claudio Spick; Melanie Schernthaner; Margaretha Rudas; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Julia Furtner; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Ritse Mann; Alexandra Athanasiou; Helmut Prosch; Katja Pinker; Matthias Dietzel; Thomas H Helbich; Michael Fuchsjäger; Julia Camps-Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli; Gabor Forrai; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

Authors:  Christopher E Comstock; Constantine Gatsonis; Gillian M Newstead; Bradley S Snyder; Ilana F Gareen; Jennifer T Bergin; Habib Rahbar; Janice S Sung; Christina Jacobs; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary H Nicholson; Robert C Ward; Jacqueline Holt; Andrew Prather; Kathy D Miller; Mitchell D Schnall; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 157.335

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Rintaro Ito; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Authors:  Almir Bitencourt; Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.531

3.  Breast Tumor Identification in Ultrafast MRI Using Temporal and Spatial Information.

Authors:  Xueping Jing; Monique D Dorrius; Mirjam Wielema; Paul E Sijens; Matthijs Oudkerk; Peter van Ooijen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Breast Cancer Classification on Multiparametric MRI - Increased Performance of Boosting Ensemble Methods.

Authors:  Alexandros Vamvakas; Dimitra Tsivaka; Andreas Logothetis; Katerina Vassiou; Ioannis Tsougos
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

5.  Radiogenomics analysis reveals the associations of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI features with gene expression characteristics, PAM50 subtypes, and prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wenlong Ming; Yanhui Zhu; Yunfei Bai; Wanjun Gu; Fuyu Li; Zixi Hu; Tiansong Xia; Zuolei Dai; Xiafei Yu; Huamei Li; Yu Gu; Shaoxun Yuan; Rongxin Zhang; Haitao Li; Wenyong Zhu; Jianing Ding; Xiao Sun; Yun Liu; Hongde Liu; Xiaoan Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.