Literature DB >> 33743583

Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.

Todd A MacKenzie1,2, Pablo Martinez-Camblor3,4, A James O'Malley3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimation that employs instrumental variables (IV) can reduce or eliminate bias due to confounding. In observational studies, instruments result from natural experiments such as the effect of clinician preference or geographic distance on treatment selection. In randomized studies the randomization indicator is typically a valid instrument, especially if the study is blinded, e.g. no placebo effect. Estimation via instruments is a highly developed field for linear models but the use of instruments in time-to-event analysis is far from established. Various IV-based estimators of the hazard ratio (HR) from Cox's regression models have been proposed.
METHODS: We extend IV based estimation of Cox's model beyond proportionality of hazards, and address estimation of a log-linear time dependent hazard ratio and a piecewise constant HR. We estimate the marginal time-dependent hazard ratio unlike other approaches that estimate the hazard ratio conditional on the omitted covariates. We use estimating equations motivated by Martingale representations that resemble the partial likelihood score statistic. We conducted simulations that include the use of copulas to generate potential times-to-event that have a given marginal structural time dependent hazard ratio but are dependent on omitted covariates. We compare our approach to the partial likelihood estimator, and two other IV based approaches. We apply it to estimation of the time dependent hazard ratio for two vascular interventions.
RESULTS: The method performs well in simulations of a stepwise time-dependent hazard ratio, but illustrates some bias that increases as the hazard ratio moves away from unity (the value that typically underlies the null hypothesis). It compares well to other approaches when the hazard ratio is stepwise constant. It also performs well for estimation of a log-linear hazard ratio where no other instrumental variable approaches exist.
CONCLUSION: The estimating equations we propose for estimating a time-dependent hazard ratio using an IV perform well in simulations. We encourage the use of our procedure for time-dependent hazard ratio estimation when unmeasured confounding is a concern and a suitable instrumental variable exists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causal inference; Censoring; Marginal model; Semi-parametric model

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33743583      PMCID: PMC7981853          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01245-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  On the Breslow estimator.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Instrumental variable based estimation under the semiparametric accelerated failure time model.

Authors:  Jared D Huling; Menggang Yu; A James O'Malley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  On collapsibility and confounding bias in Cox and Aalen regression models.

Authors:  Torben Martinussen; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Instrumental variable additive hazards models.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Jason Fine; Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Instrumental variables estimation of exposure effects on a time-to-event endpoint using structural cumulative survival models.

Authors:  Torben Martinussen; Stijn Vansteelandt; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; David M Zucker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Instrumental variable estimation in a survival context.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Stefan Walter; Stijn Vansteelandt; Torben Martinussen; Maria Glymour
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Using instrumental variables to estimate a Cox's proportional hazards regression subject to additive confounding.

Authors:  Todd A MacKenzie; Tor D Tosteson; Nancy E Morden; Therese A Stukel; A James O'Malley
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2014-06

9.  The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Vipul Jairath; Caroline J Doré; Tim P Morris
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Comparing Long-term Mortality After Carotid Endarterectomy vs Carotid Stenting Using a Novel Instrumental Variable Method for Risk Adjustment in Observational Time-to-Event Data.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Todd A MacKenzie; Douglas O Staiger; Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; A James O'Malley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-09-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Learning the Treatment Impact on Time-to-Event Outcomes: The Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Simulated Cohort.

Authors:  Pablo Martínez-Camblor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.