Literature DB >> 25506259

Using instrumental variables to estimate a Cox's proportional hazards regression subject to additive confounding.

Todd A MacKenzie1, Tor D Tosteson1, Nancy E Morden1, Therese A Stukel2, A James O'Malley1.   

Abstract

The estimation of treatment effects is one of the primary goals of statistics in medicine. Estimation based on observational studies is subject to confounding. Statistical methods for controlling bias due to confounding include regression adjustment, propensity scores and inverse probability weighted estimators. These methods require that all confounders are recorded in the data. The method of instrumental variables (IVs) can eliminate bias in observational studies even in the absence of information on confounders. We propose a method for integrating IVs within the framework of Cox's proportional hazards model and demonstrate the conditions under which it recovers the causal effect of treatment. The methodology is based on the approximate orthogonality of an instrument with unobserved confounders among those at risk. We derive an estimator as the solution to an estimating equation that resembles the score equation of the partial likelihood in much the same way as the traditional IV estimator resembles the normal equations. To justify this IV estimator for a Cox model we perform simulations to evaluate its operating characteristics. Finally, we apply the estimator to an observational study of the effect of coronary catheterization on survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness; Cox survival model; Hazard ratio; IV; Method-of-moments; Omitted confounder

Year:  2014        PMID: 25506259      PMCID: PMC4261749          DOI: 10.1007/s10742-014-0117-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol        ISSN: 1387-3741


  13 in total

1.  An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology.

Authors:  Samy Suissa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases.

Authors:  Lesley H Curtis; Bradley G Hammill; Eric L Eisenstein; Judith M Kramer; Kevin J Anstrom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Murray A Mittleman; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research.

Authors:  K M Johnston; P Gustafson; A R Levy; P Grootendorst
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; M McClellan
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Mendelian randomization: nature's randomized trial in the post-genome era.

Authors:  George Thanassoulis; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables.

Authors:  M McClellan; B J McNeil; J P Newhouse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for elderly patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Dan Gottlieb; Yin Su; Alistair J O'Malley; Nicos Labropoulos; Phillip Goodney; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  A causal proportional hazards estimator under homogeneous or heterogeneous selection in an IV setting.

Authors:  Ditte Nørbo Sørensen; Torben Martinussen; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  The impact of frequent cystoscopy on surgical care and cancer outcomes among patients with low-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Kristine E Lynch; Zhongze Li; Todd A MacKenzie; David S Han; John D Seigne; Douglas J Robertson; Brenda Sirovich; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Instrumental variable estimation in a survival context.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Stefan Walter; Stijn Vansteelandt; Torben Martinussen; Maria Glymour
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Comparison of clipping and coiling in elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Daniel J Gottlieb; Yin Su; A James O'Malley; Nicos Labropoulos; Philip Goodney; Michael T Lawton; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Patient Centered Hazard Ratio Estimation Using Principal Stratification Weights: Application to the NORCCAP Randomized Trial of Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Todd A MacKenzie; Magnus Løberg; A James O'Malley
Journal:  Obs Stud       Date:  2016-04-24

7.  Some statistical consideration in transcriptome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Haoran Xue; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Deterring Rearrests for Drinking and Driving.

Authors:  Frank Sloan; Lindsey Eldred; Sabrina McCutchan; Alyssa Platt
Journal:  South Econ J       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Yu; Hongkai Li; Xiaoru Sun; Ping Su; Tingting Wang; Yi Liu; Zhongshang Yuan; Yanxun Liu; Fuzhong Xue
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Comparing Long-term Mortality After Carotid Endarterectomy vs Carotid Stenting Using a Novel Instrumental Variable Method for Risk Adjustment in Observational Time-to-Event Data.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Todd A MacKenzie; Douglas O Staiger; Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; A James O'Malley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.