Marlies P Rossmann1,2, Leonard I Zon1,2. 1. Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge. 2. Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transcription of erythroid-specific genes is regulated by the three-dimensional (3D) structure and composition of chromatin, which dynamically changes during erythroid differentiation. Chromatin organization and dynamics are regulated by several epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA (de-)methylation, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of histones, chromatin-associated structural proteins, and higher-order structural changes and interactions. This review addresses examples of recent developments in several areas delineating the interface of chromatin regulation and erythroid-specific lineage transcription. RECENT FINDINGS: We survey and discuss recent studies that focus on the erythroid chromatin landscape, erythroid enhancer-promotor interactions, super-enhancer functionality, the role of chromatin modifiers and epigenetic crosstalk, as well as the progress in mapping red blood cell (RBC) trait-associated genetic variants within cis-regulatory elements (CREs) identified in genome-wide association study (GWAS) efforts as a step toward determining their impact on erythroid-specific gene expression. SUMMARY: As one of the best characterized and accessible cell differentiation systems, erythropoiesis has been at the forefront of studies aiming to conceptualize how chromatin dynamics regulate transcription. New emerging technologies that bring a significantly enhanced spatial and temporal resolution of chromatin structure, and allow investigation of small cell numbers, have advanced our understanding of chromatin dynamics during erythroid differentiation in vivo.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transcription of erythroid-specific genes is regulated by the three-dimensional (3D) structure and composition of chromatin, which dynamically changes during erythroid differentiation. Chromatin organization and dynamics are regulated by several epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA (de-)methylation, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of histones, chromatin-associated structural proteins, and higher-order structural changes and interactions. This review addresses examples of recent developments in several areas delineating the interface of chromatin regulation and erythroid-specific lineage transcription. RECENT FINDINGS: We survey and discuss recent studies that focus on the erythroid chromatin landscape, erythroid enhancer-promotor interactions, super-enhancer functionality, the role of chromatin modifiers and epigenetic crosstalk, as well as the progress in mapping red blood cell (RBC) trait-associated genetic variants within cis-regulatory elements (CREs) identified in genome-wide association study (GWAS) efforts as a step toward determining their impact on erythroid-specific gene expression. SUMMARY: As one of the best characterized and accessible cell differentiation systems, erythropoiesis has been at the forefront of studies aiming to conceptualize how chromatin dynamics regulate transcription. New emerging technologies that bring a significantly enhanced spatial and temporal resolution of chromatin structure, and allow investigation of small cell numbers, have advanced our understanding of chromatin dynamics during erythroid differentiation in vivo.
Authors: Richard L Bennett; Alok Swaroop; Catalina Troche; Jonathan D Licht Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Lars L P Hanssen; Mira T Kassouf; A Marieke Oudelaar; Daniel Biggs; Chris Preece; Damien J Downes; Matthew Gosden; Jacqueline A Sharpe; Jacqueline A Sloane-Stanley; Jim R Hughes; Benjamin Davies; Douglas R Higgs Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Jacob C Ulirsch; Satish K Nandakumar; Li Wang; Felix C Giani; Xiaolan Zhang; Peter Rogov; Alexandre Melnikov; Patrick McDonel; Ron Do; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Vijay G Sankaran Journal: Cell Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Christian Babbs; James O J Davies; Bryony J Graham; Lars Hanssen; Mira T Kassouf; A Marieke Marieke Oudelaar; Jacqueline A Sharpe; Maria C Suciu; Jelena Telenius; Ruth Williams; Deborah Hay; Jim R Hughes; Christina Rode; Pik-Shan Li; Len A Pennacchio; Jacqueline A Sloane-Stanley; Helena Ayyub; Sue Butler; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler; Richard J Gibbons; Andrew J H Smith; William G Wood; Douglas R Higgs Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: A Marieke Oudelaar; Robert A Beagrie; Matthew Gosden; Sara de Ornellas; Emily Georgiades; Jon Kerry; Daniel Hidalgo; Joana Carrelha; Arun Shivalingam; Afaf H El-Sagheer; Jelena M Telenius; Tom Brown; Veronica J Buckle; Merav Socolovsky; Douglas R Higgs; Jim R Hughes Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: A Marieke Oudelaar; James O J Davies; Lars L P Hanssen; Jelena M Telenius; Ron Schwessinger; Yu Liu; Jill M Brown; Damien J Downes; Andrea M Chiariello; Simona Bianco; Mario Nicodemi; Veronica J Buckle; Job Dekker; Douglas R Higgs; Jim R Hughes Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 38.330