Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer1, Andrew L Hedges2. 1. School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA. Tiffany.Champagne@uth.tmc.edu. 2. School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The demographic profile of practicing physicians is changing as more female medical students are graduating and practicing in the field. While the education received may not differ by gender, studies have shown that physician practice outcomes vary by provider gender. Various factors could contribute to these differences, including culture and explicit biases which may lead to implicit bias. This study aims to identify the available evidence of gender-based implicit bias throughout the delivery process of medicine. METHODS: This scoping review evaluated published literature within the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and BioMed Central databases pertaining to physician's gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine. Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage methodology was used as a framework and reported using the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches occurred between May 2020 and June 2020, and the timeframe was not limited. Included articles had gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine and implicit bias. Articles were excluded if they did not include the gender of the physician. After screening by reviewers and a medical librarian, study characteristics were charted and analyzed. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 2420 records. After screening, 162 of the records were selected based on title and keyword relevance. After additional screening, 15 records were ultimately included in the review based on full-text evaluation. Records were organized into sub-topics post hoc focused on clinical qualities, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes. CONCLUSION: This scoping review found that gender-based implicit bias may be inadvertently acquired from culture and education. Although implicit bias is highly researched, much of the current literature focuses on the gender of the patient. This study found important gaps in the available literature regarding race and gender of the physician. Further studies could explore outcome differences between recent graduates and career physicians, for both female and male physicians.
BACKGROUND: The demographic profile of practicing physicians is changing as more female medical students are graduating and practicing in the field. While the education received may not differ by gender, studies have shown that physician practice outcomes vary by provider gender. Various factors could contribute to these differences, including culture and explicit biases which may lead to implicit bias. This study aims to identify the available evidence of gender-based implicit bias throughout the delivery process of medicine. METHODS: This scoping review evaluated published literature within the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and BioMed Central databases pertaining to physician's gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine. Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage methodology was used as a framework and reported using the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches occurred between May 2020 and June 2020, and the timeframe was not limited. Included articles had gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine and implicit bias. Articles were excluded if they did not include the gender of the physician. After screening by reviewers and a medical librarian, study characteristics were charted and analyzed. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 2420 records. After screening, 162 of the records were selected based on title and keyword relevance. After additional screening, 15 records were ultimately included in the review based on full-text evaluation. Records were organized into sub-topics post hoc focused on clinical qualities, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes. CONCLUSION: This scoping review found that gender-based implicit bias may be inadvertently acquired from culture and education. Although implicit bias is highly researched, much of the current literature focuses on the gender of the patient. This study found important gaps in the available literature regarding race and gender of the physician. Further studies could explore outcome differences between recent graduates and career physicians, for both female and male physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gender medicine; Implicit bias; Medical education; Provider characteristics
Authors: Heather J Furnas; Rebecca M Garza; Alexander Y Li; Debra J Johnson; Anureet K Bajaj; Loree K Kalliainen; Jane S Weston; David H Song; Kevin C Chung; Rod J Rohrich Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Frederick M Chen; George E Fryer; Robert L Phillips; Elisabeth Wilson; Donald E Pathman Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Marielle A Amoli; John M Flynn; Eric W Edmonds; Michael P Glotzbecker; Derek M Kelly; Jeffrey R Sawyer Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Naif Fnais; Charlene Soobiah; Maggie Hong Chen; Erin Lillie; Laure Perrier; Mariam Tashkhandi; Sharon E Straus; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran; Andrea C Tricco Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Victoria Hardy; Adelaide Yue; Stephanie Archer; Samuel William David Merriel; Matthew Thompson; Jon Emery; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692