PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To explore similarities and differences between lesbian and heterosexual survivors of breast cancer regarding cancer experiences, medical interactions related to cancer treatment, and quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Urban, community-based health center. SAMPLE: A convenience sample of lesbians (n = 13) and heterosexual women (n = 28) with a diagnosis of breast cancer within the past five years. Participants were recruited via posted advertisements. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted as part of a larger study exploring coping and adjustment in lesbian survivors of breast cancer. Transcribed focus group data were analyzed through thematic and representative case study methods. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Broad aspects of medical interactions and the patient-provider relationship that may be associated with improved QOL of lesbian and heterosexual patients with cancer. FINDINGS: Data suggested similarities between lesbians and heterosexual women in their overall QOL. However, differences did emerge between the groups. Lesbians reported higher stress associated with diagnosis, lower satisfaction with care received from physicians, and a trend toward lower satisfaction with the availability of emotional support. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings have important implications for future research on adjustment and coping among lesbian patients with breast cancer and for the improvement of their mental and physical healthcare services. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Study findings may help improve healthcare services for lesbians with cancer.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To explore similarities and differences between lesbian and heterosexual survivors of breast cancer regarding cancer experiences, medical interactions related to cancer treatment, and quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Urban, community-based health center. SAMPLE: A convenience sample of lesbians (n = 13) and heterosexual women (n = 28) with a diagnosis of breast cancer within the past five years. Participants were recruited via posted advertisements. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted as part of a larger study exploring coping and adjustment in lesbian survivors of breast cancer. Transcribed focus group data were analyzed through thematic and representative case study methods. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Broad aspects of medical interactions and the patient-provider relationship that may be associated with improved QOL of lesbian and heterosexual patients with cancer. FINDINGS: Data suggested similarities between lesbians and heterosexual women in their overall QOL. However, differences did emerge between the groups. Lesbians reported higher stress associated with diagnosis, lower satisfaction with care received from physicians, and a trend toward lower satisfaction with the availability of emotional support. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings have important implications for future research on adjustment and coping among lesbian patients with breast cancer and for the improvement of their mental and physical healthcare services. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Study findings may help improve healthcare services for lesbians with cancer.
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; Susan T Vadaparampil; Giang T Nguyen; B Lee Green; Peter A Kanetsky; Matthew B Schabath Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ash Alpert; Charles Kamen; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren Hamel; Julia Seay; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Mary L Greaney; Kim Sprunck-Harrild; Meghan E Meyer; Karen M Emmons; Ann H Partridge Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; Julia McGee; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Chelsea Herbert; Rosevine Azap; Alizeh Abbas; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603