Literature DB >> 33740936

The relative importance of work-related and non-work-related stressors and perceived social support on global perceived stress in a cross-sectional population-based sample.

Jes Bak Sørensen1, Mathias Lasgaard2, Morten Vejs Willert3, Finn Breinholt Larsen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High levels of perceived stress have a negative bearing on health and well-being, and stress is a major public health issue. According to the Stress Process Model, stressors are socially patterned and combine to produce strain. Despite this, most studies on stress have focused on work-related stressors leaving non-work determinants under-investigated. The aim of the present study was to determine the relative importance of work-related and non-work-related stressors and perceived social support for the overall perceived stress level.
METHODS: Self-reported data were drawn from the 2017 population-based health survey "How are you?" conducted in the Central Denmark Region (N = 32,417). Data were linked with data drawn from national administrative registers. Work- and non-work-related stressors assessed included major life events, chronic stressors and daily hassles. Perceived social support was assessed using a single question. Overall perceived stress was assessed by the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. We conducted dominance analyses based on a multiple linear regression model to determine the most important explanatory variables of overall perceived stress. Analyses were weighted and adjusted.
RESULTS: Work- and non-work-related stressors along with perceived social support explained 42.5% of the total variance (R2) in overall perceived stress. The most important explanatory variables were disease, perceived social support and work situation. The stratified analyses produced slightly varying results ("dominance profiles") of perceived stress between subgroups. Work situation was the most important explanatory variable in the employed group. However, adding non-work-related explanatory variables to the analysis tripled the explained variance.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall level of perceived stress can be statistically explained by a combination of work- and non-work-related stressors and perceived social support both at population level and in subgroups. The most important explanatory variables of overall perceived stress are disease, perceived social support and work situation. Results indicate that public health strategies aiming to reduce stress should take a comprehensive approach and address a variety of stressor domains rather than focus on a single domain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (r. no. 2012-58-0006) and registered in the Central Denmark Region (r. no. 1-16-02-593-16).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dominance analysis; Non-work; Perceived stress scale; Population-based; Social support; Stress; Stressors; Survey; Work

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740936      PMCID: PMC7980655          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10594-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  57 in total

1.  Sociological inquiry into mental health: the legacy of Leonard I. Pearlin.

Authors:  Carol S Aneshensel
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2015-05-06

2.  The Association Between Perceived Stress and Mortality Among People With Multimorbidity: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Anders Prior; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Karen Kjær Larsen; Finn Breinholt Larsen; Kirstine Magtengaard Robinson; Marie Germund Nielsen; Kaj Sparle Christensen; Stewart W Mercer; Mogens Vestergaard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The multilevel determinants of workers' mental health: results from the SALVEO study.

Authors:  Alain Marchand; Pierre Durand; Victor Haines; Steve Harvey
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 4.  Stress and type 2 diabetes: a review of how stress contributes to the development of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Shona J Kelly; Mubarak Ismail
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  The sociological study of stress.

Authors:  L I Pearlin
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1989-09

6.  Perceived stress and risk of any osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  A B Pedersen; L M Baggesen; V Ehrenstein; L Pedersen; M Lasgaard; E M Mikkelsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Stressful life events and major depression: risk period, long-term contextual threat, and diagnostic specificity.

Authors:  K S Kendler; L M Karkowski; C A Prescott
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Work-related stress in midlife and all-cause mortality: can sense of coherence modify this association?

Authors:  Charlotta Nilsen; Ross Andel; Johan Fritzell; Ingemar Kåreholt
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 9.  What do we know about the non-work determinants of workers' mental health? A systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Nancy Beauregard; Alain Marchand; Marie-Eve Blanc
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Alcohol, aging, and the stress response.

Authors:  R L Spencer; K E Hutchison
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  1999
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of a Mindfulness Program on Mental Health in Students at an Undergraduate Program for Teacher Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Real-Life.

Authors:  Lise Juul; Eva Brorsen; Katinka Gøtzsche; Birgitte Lund Nielsen; Lone Overby Fjorback
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-06

Review 2.  Eight Ways Nurses Can Manage a Burnt-Out Leader.

Authors:  Robin Squellati; George A Zangaro
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.