Literature DB >> 27335331

Work-related stress in midlife and all-cause mortality: can sense of coherence modify this association?

Charlotta Nilsen1, Ross Andel2,3, Johan Fritzell4, Ingemar Kåreholt4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival reflects the accumulation of multiple influences experienced over the life course. Given the amount of time usually spent at work, the influence of work may be particularly important. We examined the association between work-related stress in midlife and subsequent mortality, investigating whether sense of coherence modified the association.
METHODS: Self-reported work-related stress was assessed in 1393 Swedish workers aged 42-65 who participated in the nationally representative Level of Living Survey in 1991. An established psychosocial job exposure matrix was applied to measure occupation-based stress. Sense of coherence was measured as meaningfulness, manageability and comprehensibility. Mortality data were collected from the Swedish National Cause of Death Register. Data were analyzed with hazard regression with Gompertz distributed baseline intensity.
RESULTS: After adjustment for socioeconomic position, occupation-based high job strain was associated with higher mortality in the presence of a weak sense of coherence (HR, 3.15; 1.62-6.13), a result that was stronger in women (HR, 4.48; 1.64-12.26) than in men (HR, 2.90; 1.12-7.49). Self-reported passive jobs were associated with higher mortality in the presence of a weak sense of coherence in men (HR, 2.76; 1.16-6.59). The link between work stress and mortality was not significant in the presence of a strong sense of coherence, indicating that a strong sense of coherence buffered the negative effects of work-related stress on mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to work environments that reduce work-related stress may contribute to better health and longer lives, especially in combination with promoting a sense of coherence among workers.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27335331     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  6 in total

1.  The Value of Worker Well-Being.

Authors:  Jerome M Adams
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Job strain and cognitive change: the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area follow-up study.

Authors:  Liming Dong; William W Eaton; Adam P Spira; Jacqueline Agnew; Pamela J Surkan; Ramin Mojtabai
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Computer-based versus in-person interventions for preventing and reducing stress in workers.

Authors:  Anootnara Talkul Kuster; Therese K Dalsbø; Bao Yen Luong Thanh; Arnav Agarwal; Quentin V Durand-Moreau; Ingvild Kirkehei
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-30

4.  The association between caregiver well-being and care provided to persons with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

Authors:  Afeez Abiola Hazzan; Harry Shannon; Jenny Ploeg; Parminder Raina; Laura N Gitlin; Mark Oremus
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-07-18

5.  The relative importance of work-related and non-work-related stressors and perceived social support on global perceived stress in a cross-sectional population-based sample.

Authors:  Jes Bak Sørensen; Mathias Lasgaard; Morten Vejs Willert; Finn Breinholt Larsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Sleep disturbance and work-related mental strain: A national prospective cohort study of the prediction of subsequent long-term sickness absence, disability pension and mortality.

Authors:  Torbjörn Åkerstedt; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Syed Rahman
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.