Literature DB >> 33740929

Predictors associated with neurological recovery after anterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Hiroyuki Inose1,2, Takashi Hirai3, Toshitaka Yoshii3, Atsushi Kimura4, Katsushi Takeshita4, Hirokazu Inoue4, Asato Maekawa5, Kenji Endo5, Takeo Furuya6, Akira Nakamura7, Kanji Mori7, Shunsuke Kanbara8, Shiro Imagama8, Shoji Seki9, Shunji Matsunaga10, Kunihiko Takahashi11, Atsushi Okawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) has often been performed for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in patients with poor cervical spine alignment and/or anterior cord compression. We aimed to identify clinical and radiological predictors associated with neurological recovery after ADF.
METHODS: This post-hoc analysis from a prospective multicenter study included patients who were scheduled for ADF for DCM. The patients who received other surgeries (laminoplasty, posterior decompression and fusion) were excluded. The associations between baseline clinical and radiographic variables (age, sex, body mass index, etiology, cervical lordosis, range of motion, C7 slope, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], thoracic kyphosis [TK], lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, SVA, pelvic tilt, T1 pelvic angle [TPA], the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy [C-JOA], European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Scale [EQ-5D], Neck Disability Index [NDI], Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 [PCS], and Mental Component Summary of the SF-36) and the recovery rates as the outcome variables were investigated in the univariate regression analysis. Then, the independent predictors for increased recovery rates were evaluated using a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: In total, 37 patients completed the 1 year follow-up. The recovery rate was significantly correlated with SVA (p = 0.001) and TPA (p = 0.03). Univariate regression analyses showed that age (Regression coefficient = - 0.92, p = 0.049), SVA (Regression coefficient  = - 0.57, p = 0.004) and PCS (Regression coefficient = 0.80, p = 0.03) score were significantly associated with recovery rate. Then, a stepwise multiple regression analysis identified the independent predictors of recovery rate after ADF as TK (p = 0.01), PCS (p = 0.03), and SVA (p = 0.03). According to this prediction model, the following equation was obtained: recovery rate = - 8.26 + 1.17 × (TK) - 0.45 × (SVA) + 0.85 × (PCS) (p = 0.002, R2 = 0.44).
CONCLUSION: Patients with lower TK, lower PCS score, and higher SVA were more likely to have poor neurological recovery after ADF. Therefore, patients with DCM and these predictors who undergo ADF should be warned about poor recovery and be required to provide adequate informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neck Pain; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; Spinal Fusion; Spinal Stenosis; Spondylosis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740929      PMCID: PMC7980318          DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01147-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


  33 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An MRI-Based Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis Using Data from the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine CSM North America and International Studies.

Authors:  So Kato; Aria Nouri; Dongjin Wu; Satoshi Nori; Lindsay Tetreault; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Is Modified K-line a Powerful Tool of Surgical Decision Making for Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Authors:  Takashi Hirai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Hiroyuki Inose; Masato Yuasa; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Shuta Ushio; Hiroaki Onuma; Keigo Hirai; Yutaka Kobayashi; Kurando Utagawa; Jun Hashimoto; Atsuyuki Kawabata; Kenichiro Sakai; Tsuyoshi Kato; Shigenori Kawabata; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Laminoplasty, Anterior Decompression With Fusion, and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Inose; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Kimura; Katsushi Takeshita; Hirokazu Inoue; Asato Maekawa; Kenji Endo; Takuya Miyamoto; Takeo Furuya; Akira Nakamura; Kanji Mori; Shunsuke Kanbara; Shiro Imagama; Shoji Seki; Shunji Matsunaga; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; João Luiz Pinheiro-Franco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally.

Authors:  Devon J Ryan; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Christopher P Ames; Richard Hostin; Eric Klineberg; Gregory M Mundis; Ibrahim Obeid; Khaled Kebaish; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Munish Gupta; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher S Ahuja; Muhammad A Akbar; Christopher D Witiw; Farshad Nassiri; Julio C Furlan; Armin Curt; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Multivariate analysis of poor outcome after anterior surgery in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with heterotopic ossification and preoperative kyphotic alignment.

Authors:  ShaoQing Li; BaoYang Zhang; Yong Shen; ZhanYong Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.