| Literature DB >> 33738895 |
Chloe C Casagrande1, Brandon J Lew1,2, Brittany K Taylor1, Mikki Schantell1,2, Jennifer O'Neill3, Pamela E May4, Susan Swindells3, Tony W Wilson1,2.
Abstract
HIV-infection has been associated with widespread alterations in brain structure and function, although few studies have examined whether such aberrations are co-localized and the degree to which clinical and cognitive metrics are related. We examine this question in the somatosensory system using high-resolution structural MRI (sMRI) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) imaging of neural oscillatory activity. Forty-four participants with HIV (PWH) and 55 demographically-matched uninfected controls completed a paired-pulse somatosensory stimulation paradigm during MEG and underwent 3T sMRI. MEG data were transformed into the time-frequency domain; significant sensor level responses were imaged using a beamformer. Virtual sensor time series were derived from the peak responses. These data were used to compute response amplitude, sensory gating metrics, and spontaneous cortical activity power. The T1-weighted sMRI data were processed using morphological methods to derive cortical thickness values across the brain. From these, the cortical thickness of the tissue coinciding with the peak response was estimated. Our findings indicated both PWH and control exhibit somatosensory gating, and that spontaneous cortical activity was significantly stronger in PWH within the left postcentral gyrus. Interestingly, within the same tissue, PWH also had significantly reduced cortical thickness relative to controls. Follow-up analyses indicated that the reduction in cortical thickness was significantly correlated with CD4 nadir and mediated the relationship between HIV and spontaneous cortical activity within the left postcentral gyrus. These data indicate that PWH have abnormally strong spontaneous cortical activity in the left postcentral gyrus and such elevated activity is driven by locally reduced cortical gray matter thickness.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; gamma oscillations; magnetoencephalography; somatosensory gating; voxel-based morphometry
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33738895 PMCID: PMC8127147 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
Participant demographics
| Control ( | PWH ( | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 42.5 ± 10.6 | 45.9 ± 10.0 |
|
| Sex | 32 M, 23 F | 26 M, 18 F |
|
| Handedness | 51 R, 4 L | 41 R, 3 L |
|
| Weight (kg) | 91.9 ± 23.8 | 85.1 ± 23.5 |
|
| Education (years) | 16.8 ± 2.34 | 14.5 ± 2.22 |
|
| Time on cART (years) | – | 9.12 ± 6.01 | |
| Time since HIV diagnosis (years) | – | 10.8 ± 6.48 | |
| CD4 nadir (cells/μl) | – | 209 ± 159 | |
| Current CD4 (cells/μl) | – | 792 ± 460 |
Note: Values displayed are mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: cART, combination antiretroviral therapy; F, female; L, left; M, male; R, right.
FIGURE 1Neural responses to paired‐pulse somatosensory stimulations to the right median nerve. (a) Time frequency spectrogram depicting broadband somatosensory responses from a representative MEG sensor near the left somatosensory cortex. The x‐axis denotes time (ms) while the y‐axis denotes the frequency (Hz). The stimulation onsets occurred at 0 ms for stimulation 1 and 500 ms for stimulation 2. The color bar to the right of the spectrogram indicates the color scale in percent change from baseline (−700 to −300 ms) units. (b) Grand‐averaged beamformer images collapsed across both groups for the first and second stimulation. (c) Group‐averaged beamformer images for stimulation 1 responses (top row) and stimulation 2 (bottom row). Both groups exhibited a strong increase in the 20–75 Hz spectral window during the 50 ms following each stimulation. Note that the color scale bar to the right of each group of images reflects the threshold in positive (warmer colors) and negative (cooler colors) pseudo‐t values. Across groups, the brain area exhibiting the largest response was virtually identical and was centered on the contralateral hand region of the somatosensory cortex. Note that the peak voxel in the grand‐averaged image was used for virtual sensor extraction and the additional analysis described in the methods
FIGURE 2MEG time series of somatosensory processing and spontaneous activity. (a) Grand‐averaged beamformer image for peak voxel virtual sensor extraction. (b) Relative time series in PWH and controls showing the significant sensory gating effect (i.e., stronger response to stimulation 1 compared with stimulation 2) across both groups. The dashed lines indicate the onset of each stimulation, with controls shown in blue and PWH in yellow. The shaded area around each time series reflects the SEM. (c) Absolute voxel time series showing the elevated spontaneous activity during the baseline period in PWH compared with controls. The gray shaded area reflects the baseline period (−700 to −300 ms) used to estimate the average. (d) Box plots showing the spontaneous power data in each group. The x indicates the mean, with the horizontal lines marking the median and first and third quartiles, and the dots indicate individual data points
FIGURE 3Cortical thickness in left postcentral gyrus and correlations. (a) Box plots showing the cortical thickness results in each group. The x indicates the mean, with the horizontal lines marking the median, and first and third quartiles, and the dots indicate the individual data points. (b) Correlation between cortical thickness and CD4 nadir in PWH group (ρ = 0.326, p = .043) indicating that those with lower CD4 nadir also had the thinnest cortex in the left postcentral gyrus
FIGURE 4Mediation analysis. The mediation model whereby cortical thickness in the left postcentral gyrus serves as a mediator of the relationships between diagnostic group (PWH or control) and spontaneous power during the baseline period within the same cortical tissue. All reported parameters are standardized coefficients. The value in parentheses is the total effect of the group on spontaneous baseline power. Each effect was statistically significant at the p < .05 level, as assessed by bias‐corrected bootstrapped confidence intervals. *p < .05