Literature DB >> 33737982

Measuring Surrogacy in Clinical Research: With an application to studying surrogate markers for HIV Treatment-as-Prevention.

Rui Zhuang1, Ying Qing Chen2.   

Abstract

In clinical research, validated surrogate markers are highly desirable in study design, monitoring, and analysis, as they do not only reduce the required sample size and follow-up duration, but also facilitate scientific discoveries. However, challenges exist to identify a reliable marker. One particular statistical challenge arises on how to measure and rank the surrogacy of potential markers quantitatively. We review the main statistical methods for evaluating surrogate markers. In addition, we suggest a new measure, the so-called "population surrogacy fraction of treatment effect," or simply the p-measure, in the setting of clinical trials. The p-measure carries an appealing population impact interpretation and supplements the existing statistical measures of surrogacy by providing "absolute" information. We apply the new measure along with other prominent measures to the HIV Prevention Trial Network 052 Study, a landmark trial for HIV/AIDS treatment-as-prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Population attributable fraction; Proportion of treatment effect explained; Randomized trial; Surrogate marker

Year:  2019        PMID: 33737982      PMCID: PMC7962622          DOI: 10.1007/s12561-019-09244-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biosci        ISSN: 1867-1764


  62 in total

Review 1.  Statistical challenges in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in randomized trials.

Authors:  Geert Molenberghs; Marc Buyse; Helena Geys; Didier Renard; Tomasz Burzykowski; Ariel Alonso
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-12

2.  Prentice's approach and the meta-analytic paradigm: a reflection on the role of statistics in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs; Tomasz Burzykowski; Didier Renard; Helena Geys; Ziv Shkedy; Fabián Tibaldi; José Cortiñas Abrahantes; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Surrogate end points in secondary analyses of cardiovascular trials.

Authors:  Kevin A Buhr
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 4.  Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Quantifying the indirect treatment effect via surrogate markers.

Authors:  Yongming Qu; Michael Case
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases.

Authors:  L S Freedman; B I Graubard; A Schatzkin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A new proportion measure of the treatment effect captured by candidate surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Fumiaki Kobayashi; Manabu Kuroki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Jenerius A Aminawung; Nilay D Shah; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Surrogate end points in clinical research: hazardous to your health.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

Authors:  D S Echt; P R Liebson; L B Mitchell; R W Peters; D Obias-Manno; A H Barker; D Arensberg; A Baker; L Friedman; H L Greene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Introduction to Special Issue on 'Statistical Methods for HIV/AIDS Research'.

Authors:  Ying Qing Chen
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2020-10-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.