| Literature DB >> 33737828 |
Dina Keumala Sari1, Liza Meutia Sari2, Lidya Imelda Laksmi3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The routine examination of vitamin D levels is carried out by checking serum 25(OH)D levels, while serum 1.25(OH)D levels are less frequently utilized. The proposition that testing for salivary vitamin D can show a correlation with serum levels in healthy people is questionable, especially with low vitamin D intake. This study aimed to find the correlation between vitamin D levels, which were assessed as 25(OH)D and 1.25(OH)D in saliva, and serum 25(OH)D and 1.25(OH)D levels in people with low vitamin D intake. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study involving healthy men and women, aged 18-60 years, carried out from August to November, 2020, in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. The parameters studied were the 25(OH)D and 1.25(OH)D levels in saliva and serum, and vitamin D intake. The statistical analysis used was the Spearman correlation test, performed to determine the correlation between each parameter.Entities:
Keywords: cross-sectional study; deficiency; food sources; non-invasive; rural; vitamin D
Year: 2021 PMID: 33737828 PMCID: PMC7961134 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S302912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Demographic Characteristics of the Subjects
| Variables | Mean | n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 41.32 ± 10.68 | |
| Minimum: 18 | ||
| Maximum: 58 | ||
| Median: 42 | ||
| Age classification | ||
| 18–25 years | 7 (12.5) | |
| 26–35 years | 6 (10.7) | |
| 36–45 years | 19 (33.9) | |
| 46–60 years | 24 (42.9) | |
| Genders | ||
| Male | 23 (41.1) | |
| Female | 33 (58.9) | |
| Ethnic | ||
| Bataknese | 26 (46.4) | |
| Malay | 30 (53.6) | |
| Occupation | ||
| Housewife | 21 (37.5) | |
| Entrepreneur | 14 (25) | |
| State civil apparatus | 9 (16) | |
| Farmer | 8 (14.3) | |
| Student | 4 (7.2) | |
| Education | ||
| Strata 1 | 9 (16.1) | |
| Diploma | 2 (3.6) | |
| Senior High School | 33 (58.9) | |
| Junior High School | 8 (14.3) | |
| Primary School | 4 (7.1) |
Notes: Data of age: not normal distribution. Numeric data were presented in mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were presented in number of the subject and percentage.
Anthropometry Parameters of the Subjects
| Variable | Mean±SD | n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2) | 26.71±11.76 | |
| Minimum: 16.69 | ||
| Maximum: 88.95 | ||
| Median: 24.62 | ||
| BMI classification: | ||
| <18 kg/m2 | 3 (5.4) | |
| 18–22.9 kg/m2 | 17 (30.4) | |
| 23–24.9 kg/m2 | 11 (19.6) | |
| >25 kg/m2 | 25 (44.6) | |
| Waist circumference measurement and classification: | ||
| Men (cm): | 83.57±11.07 | |
| <90 cm | 16 (69.6) | |
| >90 cm | 7 (30.4) | |
| Women (cm): | 82.36±12.14 | |
| <80 cm | 13 (39.4) | |
| >80 cm | 20 (60.6) |
Notes: Data of BMI: not normal distribution. Numeric data were presented in mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were presented in number of the subject and percentage.
Characteristic Data of the Subjects Based on Food Intake
| Characteristics of Food Intake | Mean±SD | n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy intake (calorie/day) | 1105.32±577.77 | |
| Categorized, n (%): | ||
| Less than 2500 calorie/day | 56(100) | |
| More than 2500 calorie/day | – | |
| Fat intake (gram/day) | 39.21±25.56 | |
| Categorized, n (%): | ||
| Less than 65 gram/day | 39(69.5) | |
| More than 65 gram/day | 17(30.5) | |
| Protein intake (gram/day) | 44.91±18.48 | |
| Categorized, n (%): | ||
| Less than 60 gram/day | 45(80.3) | |
| More than 60 gram/day | 11(19.7) | |
| Carbohydrate intake (gram/day) | 39.21±25.56 | |
| Categorized, n (%): | ||
| Less than 400 gram/day | 56(100) | |
| More than 400 gram/day | – | |
| Vitamin D intake (microgram/day) | 3.59±1.79 | |
| Categorized, n (%): | ||
| Less than 15 microgram/day | 56(100) | |
| More than 15 microgram/day | – |
Notes: Numeric data were presented in mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were presented in number of the subject and percentage.
Vitamin D Saliva and Serum Level
| Variable | Saliva | Serum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25(OH)D level (ng/mL) | 16.54±5.01 | 15.07±15.34 | 0.02* |
| Minimum: 2.05 | Minimum: 2.32 | ||
| Maximum: 25.1 | Maximum: 80.1 | ||
| Median: 17.45 | Median: 8.7 | ||
| 25(OH)D categorized [n (%)]: | |||
| ≤10 ng/mL (Deficiency) | 6 (10.7) | 30 (53.6) | 0.001* |
| 11–20 ng/mL (Insuficiency) | 38 (67.9) | 13 (23.2) | |
| ≥20 ng/mL (Optimal) | 12 (21.4) | 13 (23.2) | |
| 1.25(OH)D level (pmol/L) | 201.15±50.58 | 268.31±219.26 | 0.98 |
| Minimum: 52.7 | Minimum: 51.7 | ||
| Maximum: 285 | Maximum: 884.2 | ||
| Median: 221.5 | Median: 182 | ||
| 1.25(OH)D categorized [n (%)]: | |||
| ≤48 pmol/L (Deficiency) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – |
| >48 pmol/L (Normal) | 56 (100) | 56 (100) |
Notes: Analysis comparing 25(OH)D and 1.25(OH)D serum-saliva level: Mann-Whitney Test. Analysis comparing 25(OH)D and 1.25(OH)D serum-saliva categorized: Chi-Square. *Significant: p<0.005. Numeric data were presented in mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were presented in number of the subject and percentage.
Correlation Between Vitamin D Saliva and Serum Level
| Variable | 25(OH)D Level (ng/mL) in Serum | 1.25(OH)D Level (pmol/L) in Serum |
|---|---|---|
| 25(OH)D level (ng/mL) in saliva | r = 0.424 | |
| n = 56 | ||
| 1.25(OH)D (pmol/L) in saliva | r=0.339 | |
| n = 56 |
Notes: Analysis for correlation was using Spearman test (not normal distribution). *Significant: p<0.005.
Figure 1Scatter-plot showed correlation between 25(OH)D saliva and serum.
Figure 2Scatter-plot showed correlation between 1.25(OH)D saliva and serum.