Jessica A Palakshappa1, Kathryn E Callahan2, Nicholas M Pajewski3, Daniel Clark Files1, James J Willard3, Jeff D Williamson2. 1. Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Immunologic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine. 2. Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
Rationale: Cognitive impairment after critical illness is common in observational studies of older intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. The rate of screening for and diagnosis of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors in nonresearch settings is unknown. Objectives: To determine how often cognitive impairment was detected in older adults in the year after critical illness at an academic medical center as part of 1) the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) and 2) routine clinical care. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an urban academic medical center. The study included 696 patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the medical ICU between October 1, 2016, and October 1, 2018, and discharged alive. Patients were also required to have a health system-affiliated primary care provider. Patients were followed for 1 year. We defined cognitive impairment detected in the AWV as either an indicated diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia or patient, family, or provider indication of memory concerns during the AWV. We modeled the incidence of AWV completion and the detection of cognitive impairment using semiparametric additive models accounting for the competing risk of death. Results: Over 1 year of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of mortality was 23.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9-26.1%), with 24.7% (95% CI, 21.5-27.9%) completing the AWV. The cumulative incidence of cognitive impairment first detected through the AWV was 3.4% (95% CI, 1.8-5.0%) at 1 year, with a higher cumulative incidence for diagnoses of cognitive impairment or dementia first indicated via encounter diagnosis codes or the electronic health record problem list (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.9-7.9%). Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the currently implemented AWV is unlikely to be an adequate mechanism for detecting cognitive impairment in a high-risk population such as those recovering from critical illness.
Rationale: Cognitive impairment after critical illness is common in observational studies of older intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. The rate of screening for and diagnosis of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors in nonresearch settings is unknown. Objectives: To determine how often cognitive impairment was detected in older adults in the year after critical illness at an academic medical center as part of 1) the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) and 2) routine clinical care. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an urban academic medical center. The study included 696 patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the medical ICU between October 1, 2016, and October 1, 2018, and discharged alive. Patients were also required to have a health system-affiliated primary care provider. Patients were followed for 1 year. We defined cognitive impairment detected in the AWV as either an indicated diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia or patient, family, or provider indication of memory concerns during the AWV. We modeled the incidence of AWV completion and the detection of cognitive impairment using semiparametric additive models accounting for the competing risk of death. Results: Over 1 year of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of mortality was 23.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9-26.1%), with 24.7% (95% CI, 21.5-27.9%) completing the AWV. The cumulative incidence of cognitive impairment first detected through the AWV was 3.4% (95% CI, 1.8-5.0%) at 1 year, with a higher cumulative incidence for diagnoses of cognitive impairment or dementia first indicated via encounter diagnosis codes or the electronic health record problem list (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.9-7.9%). Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the currently implemented AWV is unlikely to be an adequate mechanism for detecting cognitive impairment in a high-risk population such as those recovering from critical illness.
Authors: Kathryn E Callahan; James F Lovato; Michael E Miller; Doug Easterling; Beth Snitz; Jeff D Williamson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Timothy D Girard; James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Brenda T Pun; Jennifer L Thompson; Ayumi K Shintani; Sharon M Gordon; Angelo E Canonico; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Dae Hyun Kim; Jung Lee; Caroline A Kim; Krista F Huybrechts; Brian T Bateman; Elisabetta Patorno; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: K M Langa; M E Chernew; M U Kabeto; A R Herzog; M B Ofstedal; R J Willis; R B Wallace; L M Mucha; W L Straus; A M Fendrick Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Soo Borson; Lori Frank; Peter J Bayley; Malaz Boustani; Marge Dean; Pei-Jung Lin; J Riley McCarten; John C Morris; David P Salmon; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard G Stefanacci; Marta S Mendiondo; Susan Peschin; Eric J Hall; Howard Fillit; J Wesson Ashford Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: William J Ehlenbach; Catherine L Hough; Paul K Crane; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Shannon S Carson; J Randall Curtis; Eric B Larson Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sumera R Ahmad; Alex D Tarabochia; Luann Budahn; Allison M Lemahieu; Brenda Anderson; Kirtivardhan Vashistha; Lioudmila Karnatovskaia; Ognjen Gajic Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-06