Daniella Karassawa Zanoni1,2, Hilda E Stambuk2, Brian Madajewski2, Pablo H Montero1, Danielli Matsuura1,2, Klaus J Busam3, Kai Ma4, Melik Z Turker4, Sonia Sequeira5, Mithat Gonen6, Pat Zanzonico7, Ulrich Wiesner4,8, Michelle S Bradbury2,8,9, Snehal G Patel1. 1. Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 5. Regulatory Oversight and Product Development, Research Technology and Management, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 8. Memorial Sloan Kettering-Cornell Center for Translation of Cancer Nanomedicines, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 9. Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping agents approved for current surgical practice lack sufficient brightness and target specificity for high-contrast, sensitive nodal visualization. Objective: To evaluate whether an ultrasmall, molecularly targeted core-shell silica nanoparticle (Cornell prime dots) can safely and reliably identify optically avid SLNs in head and neck melanoma during fluorescence-guided biopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed melanoma in whom SLN mapping was indicated. Exclusion criteria included known pregnancy, breast-feeding, or medical illness unrelated to the tumor. The trial was conducted between February 2015 and March 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with postoperative follow-up of 2 years. Data analysis was conducted from February 2015 to March 2018. Interventions: Patients received standard-of-care technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid followed by a microdose administration of integrin-targeting, dye-encapsulated nanoparticles, surface modified with polyethylene glycol chains and cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-tyrosine peptides (cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles) intradermally. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were safety, procedural feasibility, lowest particle dose and volume for maximizing nodal fluorescence signal, and proportion of nodes identified by technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid that were optically visualized by cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles. Secondary end points included proportion of patients in whom the surgical approach or extent of dissection was altered because of nodal visualization. Results: Of 24 consecutive patients enrolled (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [51-71] years), 18 (75%) were men. In 24 surgical procedures, 40 SLNs were excised. Preoperative localization of SLNs with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid was followed by particle dose-escalation studies, yielding optimized doses and volumes of 2 nmol and 0.4 mL, respectively, and maximum SLN signal-to-background ratios of 40. No adverse events were observed. The concordance rate of evaluable SLNs by technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid and cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles was 90% (95% CI, 74%-98%), 5 of which were metastatic. Ultrabright nanoparticle fluorescence enabled high-sensitivity SLN visualization (including difficult-to-access anatomic sites), deep tissue imaging, and, in some instances, detection through intact skin, thereby facilitating intraoperative identification without extensive dissection of adjacent normal tissue or nerves. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that nanoparticle-based fluorescence-guided SLN biopsy in head and neck melanoma was feasible and safe. This technology holds promise for improving lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy procedures, while potentially mitigating procedural risks. This study serves as a first step toward developing new multimodal approaches for perioperative care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02106598.
Importance: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping agents approved for current surgical practice lack sufficient brightness and target specificity for high-contrast, sensitive nodal visualization. Objective: To evaluate whether an ultrasmall, molecularly targeted core-shell silica nanoparticle (Cornell prime dots) can safely and reliably identify optically avid SLNs in head and neck melanoma during fluorescence-guided biopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed melanoma in whom SLN mapping was indicated. Exclusion criteria included known pregnancy, breast-feeding, or medical illness unrelated to the tumor. The trial was conducted between February 2015 and March 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with postoperative follow-up of 2 years. Data analysis was conducted from February 2015 to March 2018. Interventions: Patients received standard-of-care technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid followed by a microdose administration of integrin-targeting, dye-encapsulated nanoparticles, surface modified with polyethylene glycol chains and cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-tyrosine peptides (cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles) intradermally. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were safety, procedural feasibility, lowest particle dose and volume for maximizing nodal fluorescence signal, and proportion of nodes identified by technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid that were optically visualized by cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles. Secondary end points included proportion of patients in whom the surgical approach or extent of dissection was altered because of nodal visualization. Results: Of 24 consecutive patients enrolled (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [51-71] years), 18 (75%) were men. In 24 surgical procedures, 40 SLNs were excised. Preoperative localization of SLNs with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid was followed by particle dose-escalation studies, yielding optimized doses and volumes of 2 nmol and 0.4 mL, respectively, and maximum SLN signal-to-background ratios of 40. No adverse events were observed. The concordance rate of evaluable SLNs by technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid and cRGDY-PEG-Cy5.5-nanoparticles was 90% (95% CI, 74%-98%), 5 of which were metastatic. Ultrabright nanoparticle fluorescence enabled high-sensitivity SLN visualization (including difficult-to-access anatomic sites), deep tissue imaging, and, in some instances, detection through intact skin, thereby facilitating intraoperative identification without extensive dissection of adjacent normal tissue or nerves. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that nanoparticle-based fluorescence-guided SLN biopsy in head and neck melanoma was feasible and safe. This technology holds promise for improving lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy procedures, while potentially mitigating procedural risks. This study serves as a first step toward developing new multimodal approaches for perioperative care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02106598.
Authors: Matias E Valsecchi; Damian Silbermins; Nicole de Rosa; Sandra L Wong; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark B Faries; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Robert H Andtbacka; Nicola Mozzillo; Jonathan S Zager; Tiina Jahkola; Tawnya L Bowles; Alessandro Testori; Peter D Beitsch; Harald J Hoekstra; Marc Moncrieff; Christian Ingvar; Michel W J M Wouters; Michael S Sabel; Edward A Levine; Doreen Agnese; Michael Henderson; Reinhard Dummer; Carlo R Rossi; Rogerio I Neves; Steven D Trocha; Frances Wright; David R Byrd; Maurice Matter; Eddy Hsueh; Alastair MacKenzie-Ross; Douglas B Johnson; Patrick Terheyden; Adam C Berger; Tara L Huston; Jeffrey D Wayne; B Mark Smithers; Heather B Neuman; Schlomo Schneebaum; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Charlotte E Ariyan; Darius C Desai; Lisa Jacobs; Kelly M McMasters; Anja Gesierich; Peter Hersey; Steven D Bines; John M Kane; Richard J Barth; Gregory McKinnon; Jeffrey M Farma; Erwin Schultz; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Richard A Hoefer; James M Lewis; Randall Scheri; Mark C Kelley; Omgo E Nieweg; R Dirk Noyes; Dave S B Hoon; He-Jing Wang; David A Elashoff; Robert M Elashoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L M A Crane; G Themelis; H J G Arts; K T Buddingh; A H Brouwers; V Ntziachristos; G M van Dam; A G J van der Zee Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Evan Phillips; Oula Penate-Medina; Pat B Zanzonico; Richard D Carvajal; Pauliah Mohan; Yunpeng Ye; John Humm; Mithat Gönen; Hovanes Kalaigian; Heiko Schöder; H William Strauss; Steven M Larson; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Miriam Benezra; Evan Phillips; Michael Overholtzer; Pat B Zanzonico; Esa Tuominen; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury Journal: Small Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Ulrike Leiter; Thomas K Eigentler; Hans-Martin Häfner; Michael Krimmel; Ugur Uslu; Ulrike Keim; Benjamin Weide; Helmut Breuninger; Peter Martus; Claus Garbe Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Eva M Sevick-Muraca; Ruchi Sharma; John C Rasmussen; Milton V Marshall; Juliet A Wendt; Hoang Q Pham; Elizabeth Bonefas; Jessica P Houston; Lakshmi Sampath; Kristen E Adams; Darlene Kay Blanchard; Ronald E Fisher; Stephen B Chiang; Richard Elledge; Michel E Mawad Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Virginia Aragon-Sanabria; Anusha Aditya; Li Zhang; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury; Feng Chen; Barney Yoo; Tianye Cao; Brian Madajewski; Rachel Lee; Melik Z Turker; Kai Ma; Sebastien Monette; Peiming Chen; Jing Wu; Shutian Ruan; Michael Overholtzer; Pat Zanzonico; Charles M Rudin; Cameron Brennan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Tessa Buckle; Albertus W Hensbergen; Danny M van Willigen; Frank Bosse; Kevin Bauwens; Rob C M Pelger; Fijs W B van Leeuwen Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Hielke M de Vries; Elise Bekers; Matthias N van Oosterom; M Baris Karakullukcu; Henk G van; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Tessa Buckle; Oscar R Brouwer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Paolo Dell'Oglio; Danny M van Willigen; Matthias N van Oosterom; Kevin Bauwens; Fabian Hensbergen; Mick M Welling; Huijbert van der Stadt; Elise Bekers; Martin Pool; Pim van Leeuwen; Tobias Maurer; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Tessa Buckle Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: P S Russell; R Velivolu; V E Maldonado Zimbrón; J Hong; I Kavianinia; A J R Hickey; J A Windsor; A R J Phillips Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 5.988
Authors: Tessa Buckle; Maarten van Alphen; Matthias N van Oosterom; Florian van Beurden; Nina Heimburger; Jaqueline E van der Wal; Michiel van den Brekel; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Baris Karakullukcu Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 6.639