Literature DB >> 33733433

Multiple components of statistical word learning are resource dependent: Evidence from a dual-task learning paradigm.

Tanja C Roembke1, Bob McMurray2.   

Abstract

It is increasingly understood that people may learn new word/object mappings in part via a form of statistical learning in which they track co-occurrences between words and objects across situations (cross-situational learning). Multiple learning processes contribute to this, thought to reflect the simultaneous influence of real-time hypothesis testing and graduate learning. It is unclear how these processes interact, and if any require explicit cognitive resources. To manipulate the availability of working memory resources for explicit processing, participants completed a dual-task paradigm in which a cross-situational word-learning task was interleaved with a short-term memory task. We then used trial-by-trial analyses to estimate how different learning processes that play out simultaneously are impacted by resource availability. Critically, we found that the effect of hypothesis testing and gradual learning effects showed a small reduction under limited resources, and that the effect of memory load was not fully mediated by these processes. This suggests that neither is purely explicit, and there may be additional resource-dependent processes at play. Consistent with a hybrid account, these findings suggest that these two aspects of learning may reflect different aspects of a single system gated by attention, rather than competing learning systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-situational word learning; Dual systems accounts of learning; Dual-task paradigm; Implicit learning; Propose-but-verify

Year:  2021        PMID: 33733433     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01141-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

Review 1.  Words, rules, and mechanisms of language acquisition.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress; Luca L Bonatti
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-18

2.  Individual differences in category learning: sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more.

Authors:  Marci S Decaro; Robin D Thomas; Sian L Beilock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-17

3.  The many faces of working memory and short-term storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Cross-situational word learning in the right situations.

Authors:  Isabelle Dautriche; Emmanuel Chemla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Due Process in Dual Process: Model-Recovery Simulations of Decision-Bound Strategy Analysis in Category Learning.

Authors:  Charlotte E R Edmunds; Fraser Milton; Andy J Wills
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-23

6.  Cross-Situational Learning Is Supported by Propose-but-Verify Hypothesis Testing.

Authors:  Sam C Berens; Jessica S Horst; Chris M Bird
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; Sharon Goldwater; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.