Literature DB >> 24417325

Cross-situational word learning in the right situations.

Isabelle Dautriche1, Emmanuel Chemla1.   

Abstract

Upon hearing a novel word, language learners must identify its correct meaning from a diverse set of situationally relevant options. Such referential ambiguity could be reduced through repetitive exposure to the novel word across diverging learning situations, a learning mechanism referred to as cross-situational learning. Previous research has focused on the amount of information learners carry over from 1 learning instance to the next. In the present article, we investigate how context can modulate the learning strategy and its efficiency. Results from 4 cross-situational learning experiments with adults suggest the following: (a) Learners encode more than the specific hypotheses they form about the meaning of a word, providing evidence against the recent view referred to as single hypothesis testing. (b) Learning is faster when learning situations consistently contain members from a given group, regardless of whether this group is a semantically coherent group (e.g., animals) or induced through repetition (objects being presented together repetitively, just like a fork and a door may occur together repetitively in a kitchen). (c) Learners are subject to memory illusions, in a way that suggests that the learning situation itself appears to be encoded in memory during learning. Overall, our findings demonstrate that realistic contexts (such as the situation in which a given word has occurred; e.g., in the zoo or in the kitchen) help learners retrieve or discard potential referents for a word, because such contexts can be memorized and associated with a to-be-learned word. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24417325     DOI: 10.1037/a0035657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  The Pursuit of Word Meanings.

Authors:  Jon Scott Stevens; Lila R Gleitman; John C Trueswell; Charles Yang
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

2.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

3.  The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Martin Zettersten; Erica Wojcik; Viridiana L Benitez; Jenny Saffran
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Observational Word Learning: Beyond Propose-But-Verify and Associative Bean Counting.

Authors:  Tanja Roembke; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Symbolic flexibility during unsupervised word learning in children and adults.

Authors:  Tanja C Roembke; Kelsey K Wiggs; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-07-03

6.  Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Daniel I Brooks; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  The Effects of Learning and Retrieval Contexts on Cross-situational Word Learning.

Authors:  Chi-Hsin Chen; Chen Yu
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Dev Learn Epigenetic Robot       Date:  2015-12-07

8.  Grounding statistical learning in context: The effects of learning and retrieval contexts on cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Chi-Hsin Chen; Chen Yu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

9.  Two- and three-year-olds track a single meaning during word learning: Evidence for Propose-but-verify.

Authors:  Kristina Woodard; Lila R Gleitman; John C Trueswell
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2016-03-08

10.  An integrative account of constraints on cross-situational learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Michael C Frank
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.