Literature DB >> 33733156

A New Acoustic-Based Pronunciation Distance Measure.

Martijn Bartelds1, Caitlin Richter2, Mark Liberman2, Martijn Wieling1.   

Abstract

We present an acoustic distance measure for comparing pronunciations, and apply the measure to assess foreign accent strength in American-English by comparing speech of non-native American-English speakers to a collection of native American-English speakers. An acoustic-only measure is valuable as it does not require the time-consuming and error-prone process of phonetically transcribing speech samples which is necessary for current edit distance-based approaches. We minimize speaker variability in the data set by employing speaker-based cepstral mean and variance normalization, and compute word-based acoustic distances using the dynamic time warping algorithm. Our results indicate a strong correlation of r = -0.71 (p < 0.0001) between the acoustic distances and human judgments of native-likeness provided by more than 1,100 native American-English raters. Therefore, the convenient acoustic measure performs only slightly lower than the state-of-the-art transcription-based performance of r = -0.77. We also report the results of several small experiments which show that the acoustic measure is not only sensitive to segmental differences, but also to intonational differences and durational differences. However, it is not immune to unwanted differences caused by using a different recording device.
Copyright © 2020 Bartelds, Richter, Liberman and Wieling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic features; acoustic measure; foreign accent; mel-frequency cepstral coefficients; pronunciation; spoken language processing; validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33733156      PMCID: PMC7861290          DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Artif Intell        ISSN: 2624-8212


  6 in total

1.  The writer independent online handwriting recognition system frog on hand and cluster generative statistical dynamic time warping.

Authors:  Claus Bahlmann; Hans Burkhardt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing.

Authors:  Jeremy Goslin; Hester Duffy; Caroline Floccia
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Roel Smits; Roeland van Hout
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress.

Authors:  A M Sluijter; V J van Heuven
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences.

Authors:  J E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Quantitative social dialectology: explaining linguistic variation geographically and socially.

Authors:  Martijn Wieling; John Nerbonne; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.