| Literature DB >> 33733083 |
H Li1, A Kang1, B An1, L-Y Chou1, F-K Shieh2, C-K Tsung3, C Zhong1.
Abstract
Exploiting metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as selectively permeable shelters for encapsulating engineered cells to form hybrid living materials has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Optimizing the synthesis process to improve encapsulation efficiency (EE) is critical for further technological development and applications. Here, using ZIF-90 and genetically engineered Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a demo, we fabricated E. coli@ZIF-90 living composites in which E. coli cells were encapsulated in ZIF-90 crystals. We illustrated that ZIF-90 could serve as a protective porous cage for cells to shield against toxic bactericides including benzaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde, and kanamycin. Notably, the E. coli cells remained alive and could self-reproduce after removing the ZIF-90 crystal cages in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, suggesting a feasible route for protecting and prolonging the lifespan of bacterial cells. Moreover, an aqueous multiple-step deposition approach was developed to improve EE of the E. coli@ZIF-90 composites: the EE increased to 61.9 ± 5.2%, in contrast with the efficiency of the traditional method (21.3 ± 4.4%) prepared with PBS buffer. In short, we develop a simple yet viable strategy to manufacture MOF-based living hybrid materials that promise new applications across diverse fields.Entities:
Keywords: Cytoprotective cage; E. coli; Encapsulation efficiency; Living materials; Metal-organic framework
Year: 2021 PMID: 33733083 PMCID: PMC7937694 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Fig. 1(a) Synthetic scheme of the engineered Escherichia coli (E. coli) encapsulated in ZIF-90 to produce E. coli@ZIF-90 living composites. (b) Comparison of the wild-type E. coli (left) and engineered E. coli (right) that can express red fluorescent protein under excitation at 580 nm; (c) Fluorescent microscope image of the E. coli@ZIF-90; (d) SEM image of the E. coli@ZIF-90 (one-pot); (e) SEM image of the interfacial cross-section between engineered E. coli and ZIF-90 in the E. coli@ZIF-90 (via the one-pot approach), the scale bar of zoom in cross-section image is 500 nm; (f) TEM image of the E. coli@ZIF-90 (via the one-pot approach); (g) TEM diffraction of the E. coli@ZIF-90 (via the one-pot approach).
Fig. 2ATR-FTIR spectrum of (a) intact E. coli cells (20-mL OD600 = 0.8 E. coli washed by deionized water 3 times, then dried up); (b) E. coli@ZIF-90 composites after drying; (c) pure ZIF-90 crystals after drying. All samples were dried in 65 °C ovens for 8 h. ATR, attenuated total reflection.
Fig. 3(a) Schematic of ZIF-90 protecting bacteria from bactericides; (b) Mixture of E. coli@ZIF-90 and free E. coli cells without chemical treatments; (c) Mixture of E. coli@ZIF-90 and free E. coli cells after treatment with benzaldehyde; (d) Mixture of E. coli@ZIF-90 and free E. coli cells after treatment with cinnamicaldehyde; (e) 5 μL E. coli as seeds were cultivated in 200 μL LB solution for 5 h, then 20 μL of the precursor of ZIF-90 crystals and kanamycin were added. The control group was only added with 20 μL deionized water after culture for 5 h. Experiments were performed in triplicates; (f)10 μL ZIF-90 crystals (2 mg/mL) and EDTA (100 mM) were simultaneously added with 5 μL E. coli cells into 200 μL LB solution and then cultivated at 37 °C for 20 h. Experiments were performed in triplicates; (g) E. coli growth measurement (OD600) for native (red circles) and the E coli after the removal of MOFs cage by EDTA (black circles). Blank LB broth as a control group and the growth curve of E. coli@ZIF-90 supernatant was treated with kanamycin for 5 h to remove the free E. coli cells outside of ZIF-90. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Fig. 4(a) Synthetic scheme showing a multiple-step deposition (MSD) approach was applied to improve encapsulation efficiencies (EE %) of E. coli@ZIF-90; (b) Fluorescent microscope images of E. coli@ZIF-90 (one-pot, without PBS); (c) SEM image of E. coli@ZIF-90 (one-pot, without PBS); (d) Fluorescent microscope image of E. coli@ZIF-90 (MSD); (e) SEM image of E. coli@ZIF-90 (MSD); (f) SEM image of the cross-section of E. coli@ZIF-90 (MSD); (g) TEM image of E. coli@ZIF-90 (MSD) with LB etching for 4 h; (h) Encapsulation efficiency (EE %) of E. coli@ZIF-90 by different preparation approaches.