Literature DB >> 33732661

Development of Prediction Models for New Integrated Models and a Bioscore System to Identify Bacterial Infections in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Xvwen Zhai1, Min Feng2, Hui Guo3,4, Zhaojun Liang2, Yanlin Wang2, Yan Qin2, Yanyao Wu2, Xiangcong Zhao2, Chong Gao5, Jing Luo2.   

Abstract

Objectives: Distinguishing flares from bacterial infections in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients remains a challenge. This study aimed to build a model, using multiple blood cells and plasma indicators, to improve the identification of bacterial infections in SLE. Design: Building PLS-DA/OPLS-DA models and a bioscore system to distinguish bacterial infections from lupus flares in SLE. Setting: Department of Rheumatology of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Participants: SLE patients with flares (n = 142) or bacterial infections (n = 106) were recruited in this retrospective study. Outcome: The peripheral blood of these patients was collected by the experimenter to measure the levels of routine examination indicators, immune cells, and cytokines. PLS-DA/OPLS-DA models and a bioscore system were established.
Results: Both PLS-DA (R2Y = 0.953, Q2 = 0.931) and OPLS-DA (R2Y = 0.953, Q2 = 0.942) models could clearly identify bacterial infections in SLE. The white blood cell (WBC), neutrophile granulocyte (NEUT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) levels were significantly higher in bacteria-infected patients, while regulatory T (Treg) cells obviously decreased. A multivariate analysis using the above 10 dichotomized indicators, based on the cut-off value of their respective ROC curve, was established to screen out the independent predictors and calculate their weights to build a bioscore system, which exhibited a strong diagnosis ability (AUC = 0.842, 95% CI 0.794-0.891). The bioscore system showed that 0 and 100% of SLE patients with scores of 0 and 8-10, respectively, were infected with bacteria. The higher the score, the greater the likelihood of bacterial infections in SLE. Conclusions: The PLS-DA/OPLS-DA models, including the above biomarkers, showed a strong predictive ability for bacterial infections in SLE. Combining WBC, NEUT, CRP, PCT, IL-6, and IFN-γ in a bioscore system may result in faster prediction of bacterial infections in SLE and may guide toward a more appropriate, timely treatment for SLE.
Copyright © 2021 Zhai, Feng, Guo, Liang, Wang, Qin, Wu, Zhao, Gao and Luo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial infection; bioscore; lupus flare; receiver operating characteristic; systemic lupus erythematosus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732661      PMCID: PMC7957015          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.620372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


  36 in total

Review 1.  Can procalcitonin be used to distinguish between disease flare and infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ilaria Serio; Laurent Arnaud; Alexis Mathian; Pierre Hausfater; Zahir Amoura
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Peripheral neutrophil CD64 index combined with complement, CRP, WBC count and B cells improves the ability of diagnosing bacterial infection in SLE.

Authors:  M Feng; S L Zhang; Z J Liang; Y L Wang; X C Zhao; C Gao; H Guo; J Luo
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.911

3.  Increased interleukin-10 levels correlate with bacteremia and sepsis in febrile neutropenia pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Vincas Urbonas; Audronė Eidukaitė; Indrė Tamulienė
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.861

4.  Utility of neutrophil CD64 and serum TREM-1 in distinguishing bacterial infection from disease flare in SLE and ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Authors:  Sajal Ajmani; Harshit Singh; Saurabh Chaturvedi; Ravi Mishra; Mohit Kumar Rai; Avinash Jain; Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Evaluation of Th1/Th2 cytokines as a rapid diagnostic tool for severe infection in paediatric haematology/oncology patients by the use of cytometric bead array technology.

Authors:  Y Tang; C Liao; X Xu; H Song; S Shi; S Yang; F Zhao; W Xu; X Chen; J Mao; L Zhang; B Pan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Serum procalcitonin has negative predictive value for bacterial infection in active systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  K M Bador; S Intan; S Hussin; A H A Gafor
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 7.  Established and novel biomarkers of sepsis.

Authors:  James D Faix
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  Predictors of severe sepsis not clinically apparent during the first twenty-four hours of hospitalization in children with cancer, neutropenia, and fever: a prospective, multicenter trial.

Authors:  Maria E Santolaya; Ana M Alvarez; Carmen L Aviles; Ana Becker; Alejandra King; Claudio Mosso; Miguel O'Ryan; Ernesto Paya; Carmen Salgado; Pamela Silva; Santiago Topelberg; Juan Tordecilla; Monica Varas; Milena Villarroel; Tamara Viviani; Marcela Zubieta
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Infectious processes and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Rebeca Illescas-Montes; Claudia Cristina Corona-Castro; Lucia Melguizo-Rodríguez; Concepción Ruiz; Víctor J Costela-Ruiz
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  The diagnostic values of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in identifying systemic lupus erythematosus infection and disease activity.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Rong Niu; Lijuan Jiang; Yuetao Wang; Xiaonan Shao; Min Wu; Yingchun Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.