Huan Wee Chan1,2, Christopher Uff3, Aabir Chakraborty2, Neil Dorward4, Jeffrey Colin Bamber1. 1. Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom. 2. Neurosurgery Department, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom. 3. Neurosurgery Department, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 4. Neurosurgery Department, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes for brain tumor resection have been shown to be significantly improved with increased extent of resection. To achieve this, neurosurgeons employ different intra-operative tools to improve the extent of resection of brain tumors, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Young's modulus (YM) of brain tumors have been shown to be different from normal brain but the accuracy of SWE in assisting brain tumor resection has not been reported. AIMS: To determine the accuracy of SWE in detecting brain tumor residual using post-operative MRI scan as "gold standard". METHODS: Thirty-four patients (aged 1-62 years, M:F = 15:20) with brain tumors were recruited into the study. The intraoperative SWE scans were performed using Aixplorer® (SuperSonic Imagine, France) using a sector transducer (SE12-3) and a linear transducer (SL15-4) with a bandwidth of 3 to 12 MHz and 4 to 15 MHz, respectively, using the SWE mode. The scans were performed prior, during and after brain tumor resection. The presence of residual tumor was determined by the surgeon, ultrasound (US) B-mode and SWE. This was compared with the presence of residual tumor on post-operative MRI scan. RESULTS: The YM of the brain tumors correlated significantly with surgeons' findings (ρ = 0.845, p < 0.001). The sensitivities of residual tumor detection by the surgeon, US B-mode and SWE were 36%, 73%, and 94%, respectively, while their specificities were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between detection of residual tumor by SWE, US B-mode, and MRI. SWE and MRI were significantly better than the surgeon's detection of residual tumor (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SWE had a higher sensitivity in detecting residual tumor than the surgeons (94% vs. 36%). However, the surgeons had a higher specificity than SWE (100% vs. 77%). Therefore, using SWE in combination with surgeon's opinion may optimize the detection of residual tumor, and hence improve the extent of brain tumor resection.
BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes for brain tumor resection have been shown to be significantly improved with increased extent of resection. To achieve this, neurosurgeons employ different intra-operative tools to improve the extent of resection of brain tumors, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Young's modulus (YM) of brain tumors have been shown to be different from normal brain but the accuracy of SWE in assisting brain tumor resection has not been reported. AIMS: To determine the accuracy of SWE in detecting brain tumor residual using post-operative MRI scan as "gold standard". METHODS: Thirty-four patients (aged 1-62 years, M:F = 15:20) with brain tumors were recruited into the study. The intraoperative SWE scans were performed using Aixplorer® (SuperSonic Imagine, France) using a sector transducer (SE12-3) and a linear transducer (SL15-4) with a bandwidth of 3 to 12 MHz and 4 to 15 MHz, respectively, using the SWE mode. The scans were performed prior, during and after brain tumor resection. The presence of residual tumor was determined by the surgeon, ultrasound (US) B-mode and SWE. This was compared with the presence of residual tumor on post-operative MRI scan. RESULTS: The YM of the brain tumors correlated significantly with surgeons' findings (ρ = 0.845, p < 0.001). The sensitivities of residual tumor detection by the surgeon, US B-mode and SWE were 36%, 73%, and 94%, respectively, while their specificities were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between detection of residual tumor by SWE, US B-mode, and MRI. SWE and MRI were significantly better than the surgeon's detection of residual tumor (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SWE had a higher sensitivity in detecting residual tumor than the surgeons (94% vs. 36%). However, the surgeons had a higher specificity than SWE (100% vs. 77%). Therefore, using SWE in combination with surgeon's opinion may optimize the detection of residual tumor, and hence improve the extent of brain tumor resection.
Authors: M Nakamura; N Konishi; S Tsunoda; H Nakase; T Tsuzuki; H Aoki; H Sakitani; T Inui; T Sakaki Journal: Oncology Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: W Stummer; S Stocker; S Wagner; H Stepp; C Fritsch; C Goetz; A E Goetz; R Kiefmann; H J Reulen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Huan Wee Chan; Ronit Pressler; Christopher Uff; Roxanna Gunny; Kelly St Piers; Helen Cross; Jeffrey Bamber; Neil Dorward; William Harkness; Aabir Chakraborty Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Fredric B Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Jonathan M Morris; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 5.115