Literature DB >> 23192803

The variance of quantitative estimates in shear wave imaging: theory and experiments.

Thomas Deffieux1, Jean-Luc Gennisson, Benoit Larrat, Mathias Fink, Mickael Tanter.   

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the estimated shear modulus produced in shear wave imaging and the acquisition parameters. Using the framework of estimation theory and the Cramer-Rao lower bound applied both to the estimation of the velocity field variance and to the estimation of the shear wave travel time, we can derive the analytical formulation of the shear modulus variance σ(2)(μ) using relevant physical parameters such as the shear wave frequency, bandwidth, and ultrasonic parameters. This variance corresponds to the reproducibility of shear modulus reconstruction for a deterministic, quasi-homogeneous, and purely elastic medium. We thus consider the shear wave propagation as a deterministic process which is then corrupted during its observation by electronic noise and speckle decorrelation caused by shearing. A good correlation was found between analytical, numerical, and experimental results, which indicates that this formulation is well suited to understand the parameters' influence in those cases. The analytical formula stresses the importance of high-frequency and wideband shear waves for good estimation. Stiffer media are more difficult to assess reliably with identical acquisition signal-to-noise ratios, and a tradeoff between the reconstruction resolution of the shear modulus maps and the shear modulus variance is demonstrated. We then propose to use this formulation as a physical ground for a pixel-based quality measure that could be helpful for improving the reconstruction of real-time shear modulus maps for clinical applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192803     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  32 in total

1.  Ultrasonic tracking of shear waves using a particle filter.

Authors:  Atul N Ingle; Chi Ma; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Two Point Method For Robust Shear Wave Phase Velocity Dispersion Estimation of Viscoelastic Materials.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Lukasz Ambrozinski; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Shear wave elastography using amplitude-modulated acoustic radiation force and phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Thu-Mai Nguyen; Bastien Arnal; Shaozhen Song; Zhihong Huang; Ruikang K Wang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Fast shear compounding using robust 2-D shear wave speed calculation and multi-directional filtering.

Authors:  Pengfei Song; Armando Manduca; Heng Zhao; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  An analysis of intrinsic variations of low-frequency shear wave speed in a stochastic tissue model: the first application for staging liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Min Wang; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Parallel Receive Beamforming Improves the Performance of Focused Transmit-Based Single-Track Location Shear Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Rifat Ahmed; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Fast Local Phase Velocity-Based Imaging: Shear Wave Particle Velocity and Displacement Motion Study.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Fourier-Domain Shift Matching: A Robust Time-of-Flight Approach for Shear Wave Speed Estimation.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Three-dimensional sheaf of ultrasound planes reconstruction (SOUPR) of ablated volumes.

Authors:  Atul Ingle; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Preclinical Imaging Using Single Track Location Shear Wave Elastography: Monitoring the Progression of Murine Pancreatic Tumor Liver Metastasis In Vivo.

Authors:  Rifat Ahmed; Jian Ye; Scott A Gerber; David C Linehan; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.