OBJECTIVES: A major COVID-19 vaccine strategy is to induce antibodies that prevent interaction between the Spike protein's receptor-binding domain (RBD) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). These vaccines will also induce T-cell responses. However, concerns were raised that aberrant vaccine-induced immune responses may exacerbate disease. We aimed to identify minimal epitopes on the RBD that would induce antibody responses that block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2 as a strategy leading to an effective vaccine with reduced risk of inducing immunopathology. METHODS: We procured a series of overlapping 20-amino acid peptides spanning the RBD and asked which were recognised by plasma from COVID-19 convalescent patients. Identified epitopes were conjugated to diphtheria-toxoid and used to vaccinate mice. Immune sera were tested for binding to the RBD and for their ability to block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2. RESULTS: Seven putative vaccine epitopes were identified. Memory B-cells (MBCs) specific for one of the epitopes were identified in the blood of convalescent patients. When used to vaccinate mice, six induced antibodies that bound recRBD and three induced antibodies that could partially block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2. However, when the sera were combined in pairs, we observed significantly enhanced inhibition of binding of RBD to ACE2. Two of the peptides were located in the main regions of the RBD known to contact ACE2. Of significant importance to vaccine development, two of the peptides were in regions that are invariant in the UK and South African strains. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 convalescent patients have SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and MBCs, the specificities of which can be defined with short peptides. Epitope-specific antibodies synergistically block RBD-ACE2 interaction.
OBJECTIVES: A major COVID-19 vaccine strategy is to induce antibodies that prevent interaction between the Spike protein's receptor-binding domain (RBD) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). These vaccines will also induce T-cell responses. However, concerns were raised that aberrant vaccine-induced immune responses may exacerbate disease. We aimed to identify minimal epitopes on the RBD that would induce antibody responses that block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2 as a strategy leading to an effective vaccine with reduced risk of inducing immunopathology. METHODS: We procured a series of overlapping 20-amino acid peptides spanning the RBD and asked which were recognised by plasma from COVID-19 convalescent patients. Identified epitopes were conjugated to diphtheria-toxoid and used to vaccinate mice. Immune sera were tested for binding to the RBD and for their ability to block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2. RESULTS: Seven putative vaccine epitopes were identified. Memory B-cells (MBCs) specific for one of the epitopes were identified in the blood of convalescent patients. When used to vaccinate mice, six induced antibodies that bound recRBD and three induced antibodies that could partially block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2. However, when the sera were combined in pairs, we observed significantly enhanced inhibition of binding of RBD to ACE2. Two of the peptides were located in the main regions of the RBD known to contact ACE2. Of significant importance to vaccine development, two of the peptides were in regions that are invariant in the UK and South African strains. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 convalescent patients have SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and MBCs, the specificities of which can be defined with short peptides. Epitope-specific antibodies synergistically block RBD-ACE2 interaction.
Authors: H Vennema; R J de Groot; D A Harbour; M Dalderup; T Gruffydd-Jones; M C Horzinek; W J Spaan Journal: J Virol Date: 1990-03 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Chien-Te Tseng; Elena Sbrana; Naoko Iwata-Yoshikawa; Patrick C Newman; Tania Garron; Robert L Atmar; Clarence J Peters; Robert B Couch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Patience K Kiyuka; Charles N Agoti; Patrick K Munywoki; Regina Njeru; Anne Bett; James R Otieno; Grieven P Otieno; Everlyn Kamau; Taane G Clark; Lia van der Hoek; Paul Kellam; D James Nokes; Matthew Cotten Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Supriya Ravichandran; Elizabeth M Coyle; Laura Klenow; Juanjie Tang; Gabrielle Grubbs; Shufeng Liu; Tony Wang; Hana Golding; Surender Khurana Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Neeltje van Doremalen; Teresa Lambe; Alexandra Spencer; Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer; Jyothi N Purushotham; Julia R Port; Victoria A Avanzato; Trenton Bushmaker; Amy Flaxman; Marta Ulaszewska; Friederike Feldmann; Elizabeth R Allen; Hannah Sharpe; Jonathan Schulz; Myndi Holbrook; Atsushi Okumura; Kimberly Meade-White; Lizzette Pérez-Pérez; Nick J Edwards; Daniel Wright; Cameron Bissett; Ciaran Gilbride; Brandi N Williamson; Rebecca Rosenke; Dan Long; Alka Ishwarbhai; Reshma Kailath; Louisa Rose; Susan Morris; Claire Powers; Jamie Lovaglio; Patrick W Hanley; Dana Scott; Greg Saturday; Emmie de Wit; Sarah C Gilbert; Vincent J Munster Journal: Nature Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: John Lok Man Law; Michael Logan; Michael A Joyce; Abdolamir Landi; Darren Hockman; Kevin Crawford; Janelle Johnson; Gerald LaChance; Holly A Saffran; Justin Shields; Eve Hobart; Raelynn Brassard; Elena Arutyunova; Kanti Pabbaraju; Matthew Croxen; Graham Tipples; M Joanne Lemieux; D Lorne Tyrrell; Michael Houghton Journal: Vaccine Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Harikrishnan Balachandran; Chansavath Phetsouphanh; David Agapiou; Anurag Adhikari; Chaturaka Rodrigo; Mohamed Hammoud; Lok Bahadur Shrestha; Elizabeth Keoshkerian; Money Gupta; Stuart Turville; Daniel Christ; Cecile King; Sarah C Sasson; Adam Bartlett; Branka Grubor-Bauk; William Rawlinson; Anupriya Aggarwal; Alberto Ospina Stella; Vera Klemm; Michael M Mina; Jeffrey J Post; Bernard Hudson; Nicky Gilroy; Pam Konecny; Golo Ahlenstiel; Dominic E Dwyer; Tania C Sorrell; Anthony Kelleher; Nicodemus Tedla; Andrew R Lloyd; Marianne Martinello; Rowena A Bull Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Ahmed O Shalash; Armira Azuar; Harrison Y R Madge; Naphak Modhiran; Alberto A Amarilla; Benjamin Liang; Alexander A Khromykh; Daniel Watterson; Paul R Young; Istvan Toth; Mariusz Skwarczynski Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2021-12-16
Authors: Ahmed O Shalash; Armira Azuar; Harrison Y R Madge; Naphak Modhiran; Alberto A Amarilla; Benjamin Liang; Alexander A Khromykh; Waleed M Hussein; Keith J Chappell; Daniel Watterson; Paul R Young; Mariusz Skwarczynski; Istvan Toth Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 6.525