Literature DB >> 15984026

Electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in children: Evidence for giant inhibitory potentials.

Stephan Bender1, Kristine Basseler, Imke Sebastian, Franz Resch, Thomas Kammer, Rieke Oelkers-Ax, Matthias Weisbrod.   

Abstract

The electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) recently has been established as a direct parameter of motor cortex excitability. Its N100 component was suggested to reflect an inhibitory response. We investigated influences of cerebral maturation on TMS-evoked N100 in 6- to 10-year-old healthy children. We used a forewarned reaction time (contingent negative variation) task to test the effects of response preparation and sensory attention on N100 amplitude. Single-pulse TMS of motor cortex at 105% motor threshold intensity evoked N100 amplitudes of more than 100 microV in resting children (visible in single trials), which correlated negatively with age and positively with absolute stimulation intensity. During late contingent negative variation, which involves preactivation of the cortical structures necessary for a fast response, N100 amplitude was significantly reduced. We conclude that (1) N100 amplitude reduction during late contingent negative variation provides further evidence that TMS-evoked N100 reflects inhibitory processes, (2) response preparation and attention modulate N100, and (3) TMS-evoked N100 undergoes maturational changes and could serve to test cortical integrity and inhibitory function in children. Parallels between the inhibitory N100 after TMS (provoking massive synchronous excitation) and the inhibitory wave component of epileptic spike wave complexes are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15984026     DOI: 10.1002/ana.20521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  36 in total

1.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of short-latency afferent inhibition: a combined EEG and TMS study.

Authors:  Rozaliya Bikmullina; Dubravko Kicić; Synnöve Carlson; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reproducibility of TMS-Evoked EEG responses.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Dubravko Kicić; Petri Savolainen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The EEG correlates of the TMS-induced EMG silent period in humans.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Mera S Barr; Sylco S Hoppenbrouwers; Paul B Fitzgerald; Robert Chen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Corey H Allen; Benzi M Kluger; Isabelle Buard
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Motor cortical inhibition in ADHD: modulation of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked N100 in a response control task.

Authors:  Elisa D'Agati; Thomas Hoegl; Gabriel Dippel; Paolo Curatolo; Stephan Bender; Oliver Kratz; Gunther H Moll; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  TMS evoked N100 reflects local GABA and glutamate balance.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  N100 as a generic cortical electrophysiological marker based on decomposition of TMS-evoked potentials across five anatomic locations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Laura M Rowland; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  EEG responses to TMS are sensitive to changes in the perturbation parameters and repeatable over time.

Authors:  Silvia Casarotto; Leonor J Romero Lauro; Valentina Bellina; Adenauer G Casali; Mario Rosanova; Andrea Pigorini; Stefano Defendi; Maurizio Mariotti; Marcello Massimini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.

Authors:  Risto J Ilmoniemi; Dubravko Kicić
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.