Literature DB >> 33732090

The time it takes to reveal embarrassing information in a mobile phone survey.

Stefanie Fail1,2, Michael F Schober1, Frederick G Conrad3.   

Abstract

To explore socially desirable responding in telephone surveys, this study examines response latencies in answers to 27 questions in 319 audio-recorded iPhone interviews from Schober et al. (2015). Response latencies were compared when respondents (a) answered questions on sensitive vs. nonsensitive topics (as classified by online raters); (b) produced more vs. less socially desirable answers; and (c) were interviewed by a professional interviewer or an automated system. Respondents answered questions on sensitive topics more quickly than on nonsensitive topics, though patterns varied by question format (categorical, numerical, ordinal). Independent of question sensitivity, respondents gave less socially desirable answers more quickly when answering categorical and ordinal questions but more slowly when answering numeric questions. Respondents were particularly quicker to answer sensitive questions when asked by interviewers than by the automated system. Findings demonstrate that response times can be (differently) revealing about question and response sensitivity in a telephone survey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVR; interviews; response time; self-administered; sensitive questions; sensitive responses; social desirability; telephone survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 33732090      PMCID: PMC7959408          DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1824629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Soc Res Methodol        ISSN: 1364-5579


  10 in total

1.  Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  H Fu; J E Darroch; S K Henshaw; E Kolb
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 May-Jun

2.  Strategies for estimating behavioural frequency in survey interviews.

Authors:  F G Conrad; N R Brown; E R Cashman
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1998-07

3.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Complete automation of the MMPI and a study of its response latencies.

Authors:  T G Dunn; R E Lushene; H F O'Neil
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1972-12

5.  Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question is Asked Associated with Health Status?

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias.

Authors:  Philip S Brenner; John DeLamater
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2016-11-18

7.  Interviewing Practices, Conversational Practices, and Rapport: Responsiveness and Engagement in the Standardized Survey Interview.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

8.  A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: getting answers to sensitive questions.

Authors:  Ross Corkrey; Lynne Parkinson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-08

9.  Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding.

Authors:  Thomas Holtgraves
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-02

10.  Precision and Disclosure in Text and Voice Interviews on Smartphones.

Authors:  Michael F Schober; Frederick G Conrad; Christopher Antoun; Patrick Ehlen; Stefanie Fail; Andrew L Hupp; Michael Johnston; Lucas Vickers; H Yanna Yan; Chan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.