Literature DB >> 29038609

Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias.

Philip S Brenner1, John DeLamater2.   

Abstract

Explanations of error in survey self-reports have focused on social desirability: that respondents answer questions about normative behavior to appear prosocial to interviewers. However, this paradigm fails to explain why bias occurs even in self-administered modes like mail and web surveys. We offer an alternative explanation rooted in identity theory that focuses on measurement directiveness as a cause of bias. After completing questions about physical exercise on a web survey, respondents completed a text message-based reporting procedure, sending updates on their major activities for five days. Random assignment was then made to one of two conditions: instructions mentioned the focus of the study, physical exercise, or not. Survey responses, text updates, and records from recreation facilities were compared. Direct measures generated bias-overreporting in survey measures and reactivity in the directive text condition-but the nondirective text condition generated unbiased measures. Findings are discussed in terms of identity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  identity; measurement; physical exercise; survey research; time diaries

Year:  2016        PMID: 29038609      PMCID: PMC5639921          DOI: 10.1177/0190272516628298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychol Q        ISSN: 0190-2725


  19 in total

1.  The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms.

Authors:  D J Terry; M A Hogg; K M White
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-09

2.  Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters.

Authors:  R Bernstein; A Chadha; R Montjoy
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2001

3.  Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample.

Authors:  Randy Rzewnicki; Yves Vanden Auweele; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage.

Authors:  Lawrence E Barker; Elizabeth T Luman; Mary M McCauley; Susan Y Chu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Reliability, Validity, and Methodological Response to the Assessment of Physical Activity via Self-Report.

Authors:  P Patterson
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect.

Authors:  E T Higgins
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived.

Authors:  Niall Bolger; Angelina Davis; Eshkol Rafaeli
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Validity and reliability of self-reported physical activity status: the Lipid Research Clinics questionnaire.

Authors:  B E Ainsworth; D R Jacobs; A S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  The Causal Ordering of Prominence and Salience in Identity Theory: An Empirical Examination.

Authors:  Philip S Brenner; Richard T Serpe; Sheldon Stryker
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2014-07-01
View more
  27 in total

1.  Is the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in an Australian university population 6.5%?

Authors:  Rebecca Reynolds
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Generalized and Specific Problematic Internet Use in Central Siberia Adolescents: A School-Based Study of Prevalence, Age-Sex Depending Content Structure, and Comorbidity with Psychosocial Problems.

Authors:  Sergey Tereshchenko; Edward Kasparov; Nadezhda Semenova; Margarita Shubina; Nina Gorbacheva; Ivan Novitckii; Olga Moskalenko; Ludmila Lapteva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Identifying Dysphagia and Demographic Associations in Older Adults Using Electronic Health Records: A National Longitudinal Observational Study in Wales (United Kingdom) 2008-2018.

Authors:  Joe Hollinghurst; David G Smithard
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 4.  Humans as a model species for sexual selection research.

Authors:  Michael Lawrence Wilson; Carrie M Miller; Kristin N Crouse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The time it takes to reveal embarrassing information in a mobile phone survey.

Authors:  Stefanie Fail; Michael F Schober; Frederick G Conrad
Journal:  Int J Soc Res Methodol       Date:  2020-09-29

6.  Quality improvement in general practice: what do GPs and practice managers think? Results from a nationally representative survey of UK GPs and practice managers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gosling; Nicholas Mays; Bob Erens; David Reid; Josephine Exley
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-05

7.  A Scalable System for Passively Monitoring Oral Health Behaviors Using Electronic Toothbrushes in the Home Setting: Development and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Vivek Shetty; Douglas Morrison; Thomas Belin; Timothy Hnat; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Domain-specific physical activity patterns and cardiorespiratory fitness among the working population: Findings from the cross-sectional German Health Interview and Examination Survey.

Authors:  Johannes Zeiher; Maurice Duch; Lars E Kroll; Gert B M Mensink; Jonas D Finger; Thomas Keil
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  To Correct or Not Correct? Actual Evidence, Controversy and the Questions That Remain Open.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Katharina Breher; Arne Ohlendorf; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  A Comparison of the Level of Acceptance and Hesitancy towards the Influenza Vaccine and the Forthcoming COVID-19 Vaccine in the Medical Community.

Authors:  Magdalena Grochowska; Aleksandra Ratajczak; Gabriela Zdunek; Aleksander Adamiec; Paweł Waszkiewicz; Wojciech Feleszko
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.