Literature DB >> 33731793

Discontinuous phase transitions in the multi-state noisy q-voter model: quenched vs. annealed disorder.

Bartłomiej Nowak1, Bartosz Stoń1, Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron2.   

Abstract

We introduce a generalized version of the noisy q-voter model, one of the most popular opinion dynamics models, in which voters can be in one of [Formula: see text] states. As in the original binary q-voter model, which corresponds to [Formula: see text], at each update randomly selected voter can conform to its q randomly chosen neighbors only if they are all in the same state. Additionally, a voter can act independently, taking a randomly chosen state, which introduces disorder to the system. We consider two types of disorder: (1) annealed, which means that each voter can act independently with probability p and with complementary probability [Formula: see text] conform to others, and (2) quenched, which means that there is a fraction p of all voters, which are permanently independent and the rest of them are conformists. We analyze the model on the complete graph analytically and via Monte Carlo simulations. We show that for the number of states [Formula: see text] the model displays discontinuous phase transitions for any [Formula: see text], on contrary to the model with binary opinions, in which discontinuous phase transitions are observed only for [Formula: see text]. Moreover, unlike the case of [Formula: see text], for [Formula: see text] discontinuous phase transitions survive under the quenched disorder, although they are less sharp than under the annealed one.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731793      PMCID: PMC7971088          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85361-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Nonlinear q-voter model.

Authors:  Claudio Castellano; Miguel A Muñoz; Romualdo Pastor-Satorras
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-10-26

2.  First-order phase transition in a majority-vote model with inertia.

Authors:  Hanshuang Chen; Chuansheng Shen; Haifeng Zhang; Guofeng Li; Zhonghuai Hou; Jürgen Kurths
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.529

3.  Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention.

Authors:  Damon Centola; Joshua Becker; Devon Brackbill; Andrea Baronchelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Phase transitions in a multistate majority-vote model on complex networks.

Authors:  Hanshuang Chen; Guofeng Li
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.529

5.  Quenched disorder forbids discontinuous transitions in nonequilibrium low-dimensional systems.

Authors:  Paula Villa Martín; Juan A Bonachela; Miguel A Muñoz
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  Pair approximation for the q-voter model with independence on multiplex networks.

Authors:  T Gradowski; A Krawiecki
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.529

7.  Nonlinear q-voter model from the quenched perspective.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Jędrzejewski; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.642

8.  Multistate voter model with imperfect copying.

Authors:  Federico Vazquez; Ernesto S Loscar; Gabriel Baglietto
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.529

9.  Three-state opinion dynamics in modular networks.

Authors:  André L Oestereich; Marcelo A Pires; Nuno Crokidakis
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.529

Review 10.  Social tipping points in animal societies.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Andrew Berdahl; Christina Riehl; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Holly V Moeller; Elizabeth G Pringle; Lucy M Aplin; Elva J H Robinson; Jacopo Grilli; Pamela Yeh; Van M Savage; Michael H Price; Joshua Garland; Ian C Gilby; Margaret C Crofoot; Grant N Doering; Elizabeth A Hobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consensus, Polarization and Hysteresis in the Three-State Noisy q-Voter Model with Bounded Confidence.

Authors:  Maciej Doniec; Arkadiusz Lipiecki; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  Contrarian Voter Model under the Influence of an Oscillating Propaganda: Consensus, Bimodal Behavior and Stochastic Resonance.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Gimenez; Luis Reinaudi; Federico Vazquez
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.